Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, and I posted this upthread, but the other obvious temporary solution is for Janney to have trailers. I would be happy to sacrifice garden space for one trailer so my child was not in a 32 person class.
Does anyone know if this was proposed?
I think there is some sort of agreement with the city or ordinance that won't allow trailers.
I thought that was only on the part that has the underground garage on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, and I posted this upthread, but the other obvious temporary solution is for Janney to have trailers. I would be happy to sacrifice garden space for one trailer so my child was not in a 32 person class.
Does anyone know if this was proposed?
I think there is some sort of agreement with the city or ordinance that won't allow trailers.
Anonymous wrote:Frankly, and I posted this upthread, but the other obvious temporary solution is for Janney to have trailers. I would be happy to sacrifice garden space for one trailer so my child was not in a 32 person class.
Does anyone know if this was proposed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re-district part of Janney now. Simple, obvious, reasonable, and right.
Well, not so obvious. First, there's no point in rezoning to other schools that are also overcrowded, like Lafayette or Murch. So that leaves rezoning to Hearst or Mann. What is the current capacity of those buildings and IB %?
Anonymous wrote:Re-district part of Janney now. Simple, obvious, reasonable, and right.
Anonymous wrote:I heard that the new Wilson Principal dismissed some OOB students who were not maintaining a certain grade average. Deal should follow suit and maybe gpa has to be 3.0 to stay
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, not including SWW, Ellington and Banneker, or the EC's:
Anacostia: 661
Ballou: 755
Coolidge: 395
Dunbar: 653
Eastern: 1025
Woodson: 639
McKinley Tech: 645
Roosevelt: 476
Deal: 1312
Wilson: 1788
How many more kids can fit into Deal and Wilson???
Wow, does Mary Chech know about this? She should be outraged that her constitutes kids are being packed into a school building.
Anonymous wrote:So, not including SWW, Ellington and Banneker, or the EC's:
Anacostia: 661
Ballou: 755
Coolidge: 395
Dunbar: 653
Eastern: 1025
Woodson: 639
McKinley Tech: 645
Roosevelt: 476
Deal: 1312
Wilson: 1788
How many more kids can fit into Deal and Wilson???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, the real solution is to build another ES in upper NW DC, which is not going to happen but is the natural solution when all neighboring schools are also overcrowded. Then some ES will need to be rezoned to Hardy.
Is Wilsok over crowded?
The last thing we need to do is build another ES in upper NW. If Eaton (45% IB) and Hearst (27% IB) had realistic boundaries and average W3 IB participation rates (85%), there would space for 359 kids.
If Janney parents to prefer to have kids sitting on each other laps, so be it.
Hearst is only desirable to Janney parents if they can fully take it over and reconfigure it to their specific needs (a la an early childhood campus for Janney). Of course, the needs and desires of current Hearst families weren't even considered because apparently Janney has a birth right over all things Ward 3.
No, but as long as DC is to have a neighborhood school system in theory, the needs and desires of those in Ward 3 have to take longterm priority over those in other parts of the city who understandably want to Continue to enjoy wide access to schools like Hearst.
Anonymous wrote:So, not including SWW, Ellington and Banneker, or the EC's:
Anacostia: 661
Ballou: 755
Coolidge: 395
Dunbar: 653
Eastern: 1025
Woodson: 639
McKinley Tech: 645
Roosevelt: 476
Deal: 1312
Wilson: 1788
How many more kids can fit into Deal and Wilson???
Anonymous wrote:So, not including SWW, Ellington and Banneker, or the EC's:
Anacostia: 661
Ballou: 755
Coolidge: 395
Dunbar: 653
Eastern: 1025
Woodson: 639
McKinley Tech: 645
Roosevelt: 476
Deal: 1312
Wilson: 1788
How many more kids can fit into Deal and Wilson???