Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting autopsy report. Not what I expected.
why not, the county coroner did it. How the heck is someone in jail for 3 days going to get that much weed in their system ?
The cops must have been back there puffing with her.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Very interesting autopsy report. Not what I expected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's move on to the jail intake process, shall we?
The Washington Post reports that Sandra Bland attempted suicide earlier this year after the loss of a baby [reported elsewhere as a miscarriage] and was feeling "very depressed" on the day she was arrested and locked up, according to a handwritten intake screening form.
The document also mentioned the recent death of her godmother.
The jail staff had not received the required two hours of annual training for the detention of suicidal inmates. The jail also failed to comply with rules requiring guards to observe inmates face to face every hour.
My personal comment: even without the training, how could any employee possibly not see the danger signs? The revelation about the suicide attempt was supposed to have prompted guards to notify the magistrate and local crisis center.
can they prove that those handwritten intake docs have not been doctored?
Anonymous wrote:Let's move on to the jail intake process, shall we?
The Washington Post reports that Sandra Bland attempted suicide earlier this year after the loss of a baby [reported elsewhere as a miscarriage] and was feeling "very depressed" on the day she was arrested and locked up, according to a handwritten intake screening form.
The document also mentioned the recent death of her godmother.
The jail staff had not received the required two hours of annual training for the detention of suicidal inmates. The jail also failed to comply with rules requiring guards to observe inmates face to face every hour.
My personal comment: even without the training, how could any employee possibly not see the danger signs? The revelation about the suicide attempt was supposed to have prompted guards to notify the magistrate and local crisis center.
Anonymous wrote:She had a lot of marijuana in her system. Not making the case for legalization. I support legalization, but this does show that it's not unproblematic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had a lot of marijuana in her system. Not making the case for legalization. I support legalization, but this does show that it's not unproblematic.
Where did you see this?
Anonymous wrote:She had a lot of marijuana in her system. Not making the case for legalization. I support legalization, but this does show that it's not unproblematic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look, under the law, technicalities are important.
1) he did not cite the stop sign when he pulled her over
2) he did not order her to put out the cigarette.
These are important distinctions.
And the first one is irrelevant because THERE WAS NO STOP SIGN.
Actually I am one of Bland's defenders but I do believe there was a stop sign when she first pulled out onto the road where the cop already was. It looks like she blew through it. When he makes his U turn to follow here you can see the stop sign.
Did you watch all of the video including the part with his u turn?
I watched it five times and there is no stop sign. And he didn't mention a stop sign her cited her for pulling over to avoid him. Watch it again. And again if you have to. There is no stop sign.
Anonymous wrote:According to this site, the two things he told her to do, re: the cigarette and even getting out of the car were NOT lawful orders.
http://www.texasstandard.org/shows/current/10-things-about-the-sandra-bland-traffic-stop-every-texan-should-know/