Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
If you want Woodward, you all better email the BOE. Julie Yang from the BOE is actively working on a new plan with the Farmland people to even out the FARMS numbers.
Eh, don't believe this. Too risky...
She's checked out. Running for County Council. Better to just rubber stamp than rock the boat at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only are these Farmland families trying to speak for VM and WW, they're speaking for Ashburton and Wynngate families. How do those families feel about Taylor’s recommendation for WJ? They are the families that should be asking questions about building utilization and demographics of their building, not Farmland/Luxmanor families.
I personally don't think boundary should be decided based on voting by all communities. BOE job is to make decision what's best over all by keeping negative and positive in mind. I can clearyl see positive in balancing FARMS and I see no negative in doing it when schools are less than than miles away. Now I may be missing something so stakeholders should present negative and positive both. Goal should be to get the best possible boundary keeping FAA policies in mind.
- RM Parent.
Fantastic post here. Bold part should be the goal for BOE, everything else is noise.
+1000
All the parents want stability and proximity. Of course that is what is easier for our families. Taylor just threw up his hands and said oh well I guess nobody wants to balance demographics. But our school system is not and should not be a direct democracy. These are complex issues and final.decisions should be made by people who are looking at the big picture, not based on squeaky wheels and provincialism. Our elected officials who are supposed to represent the people agreed on a policy that demands the consideration of demographics. There are good reasons for this that are based in real research involving real kids in Montgomery County.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
If you want Woodward, you all better email the BOE. Julie Yang from the BOE is actively working on a new plan with the Farmland people to even out the FARMS numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
If you want Woodward, you all better email the BOE. Julie Yang from the BOE is actively working on a new plan with the Farmland people to even out the FARMS numbers.
Eh, don't believe this. Too risky...
She's checked out. Running for County Council. Better to just rubber stamp than rock the boat at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
If you want Woodward, you all better email the BOE. Julie Yang from the BOE is actively working on a new plan with the Farmland people to even out the FARMS numbers.
Eh, don't believe this. Too risky...
She's checked out. Running for County Council. Better to just rubber stamp than rock the boat at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
If you want Woodward, you all better email the BOE. Julie Yang from the BOE is actively working on a new plan with the Farmland people to even out the FARMS numbers.
Anonymous wrote:New VM Parent here...on a school parent What's Ap chat we all have now heard what is going on this thread since it was sent around. We strongly support our kids going to Woodward and support the Superintendent's recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Woodward is a completely NEW school. It belongs to VM just as much as WW, Luxmanor, Farmland, etc. What a great start to community building… I hope the parents of Woodward can move past this. Either way, the kids will be fine and find community for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yea, Farmland's position on this invalid. BOE will see through it.
Farmland and LCA being Farmland and LCA - wasn't it just a few years ago they were fighting against having the Rock Terrace school co-located with Tilden MS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only are these Farmland families trying to speak for VM and WW, they're speaking for Ashburton and Wynngate families. How do those families feel about Taylor’s recommendation for WJ? They are the families that should be asking questions about building utilization and demographics of their building, not Farmland/Luxmanor families.
I personally don't think boundary should be decided based on voting by all communities. BOE job is to make decision what's best over all by keeping negative and positive in mind. I can clearyl see positive in balancing FARMS and I see no negative in doing it when schools are less than than miles away. Now I may be missing something so stakeholders should present negative and positive both. Goal should be to get the best possible boundary keeping FAA policies in mind.
- RM Parent.
Fantastic post here. Bold part should be the goal for BOE, everything else is noise.