Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Be ready to get ignored by that poster, who doesn't come back to address when they are wrong. It's just potshots in the dark. Sound and fury, signifying nothing, and certainly not based on reality.

Someone else answered the question adequately. As for me, during this time of the year I spend more time outside in the sun than I do inside arguing on the internet. For those of you that take your medical advice from Morlocks its probably the opposite and you will be online even more as you hide from that dangerous light in the sky.

However, if you did spend some time outside, you would get enough vitamin D, your immune system would actually function enough to put away your masks and your mood would improve greatly. So much so that you would stop posting multi-page freak outs every time some expert wants you to be afraid of Measles, Ebola, Hanta Virus or whatever else they currently are angling to get funding for.

Epic post. PP, you are SO right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Be ready to get ignored by that poster, who doesn't come back to address when they are wrong. It's just potshots in the dark. Sound and fury, signifying nothing, and certainly not based on reality.

Someone else answered the question adequately. As for me, during this time of the year I spend more time outside in the sun than I do inside arguing on the internet. For those of you that take your medical advice from Morlocks its probably the opposite and you will be online even more as you hide from that dangerous light in the sky.

However, if you did spend some time outside, you would get enough vitamin D, your immune system would actually function enough to put away your masks and your mood would improve greatly. So much so that you would stop posting multi-page freak outs every time some expert wants you to be afraid of Measles, Ebola, Hanta Virus or whatever else they currently are angling to get funding for.

Blah blah blah

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Be ready to get ignored by that poster, who doesn't come back to address when they are wrong. It's just potshots in the dark. Sound and fury, signifying nothing, and certainly not based on reality.

Someone else answered the question adequately. As for me, during this time of the year I spend more time outside in the sun than I do inside arguing on the internet. For those of you that take your medical advice from Morlocks its probably the opposite and you will be online even more as you hide from that dangerous light in the sky.

However, if you did spend some time outside, you would get enough vitamin D, your immune system would actually function enough to put away your masks and your mood would improve greatly. So much so that you would stop posting multi-page freak outs every time some expert wants you to be afraid of Measles, Ebola, Hanta Virus or whatever else they currently are angling to get funding for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Because it has to be a really really sustained low level to create rickets. And most people now in northern climes supplement. When we talk low levels here, we are talking 25, 29 rather than 10 or 5. Those levels are enough to prevent rickets but still low enough to affect the immune system. Vitamin D helps cells talk to each other. Covid patients with low levels got much sicker because those cells were not communicating properly so one cell couldn’t tell the other “don’t inflame, there are enough inflamed cells”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Ohhhhhh, but wasn't an organic "clean food" lifestyle supposed to protect our healthy Aryan children from the very same diseases that ran rampant back when ALL food was organic, etc?

FFS. If you want to stress test that theory, ask an anti-vaxxer about STDs. Suppose the healthy state of your body is what you rely on to protect you from catching infectious disease. Would you have unprotected sex with someone with syphilis? Gonorrhea, HIV, active herpes? Why not?

Dumb as bricks, and with an ego the size of a whole row of port-a-potties.

I wouldn’t self-apply the label “anti-vaxxer,” but I’m almost certainly not of your tribe on public health and am open minded. What’s the point you’d like to make about STDs? I don’t understand and am curious

NP. I’m same as you. The articles here about resurgence of disease - I see no details as to which populations, etc. So many people came here completely unvaccinated from other countries in the Biden years, I would expect this. Being skeptical about what’s in a vaccine is definitely NOT the same as anti-vaxxer, though it’s being labeled as such to try and create shame. Drug companies are not above not disclosing ingredients and paying off others to keep things under their hats. Politicians are not above taking that money and lobbyists are not above any of this. Blindly trusting is just stupid!

The power of proper levels of vitamin D is not a new mystery. It’s a well-known fact, which is why the Scandinavian countries monitor levels of vitamin D and encourage supplementation in their populations.

Nothing like dodging responsibility so you can play with snakes and talk to your brain worm.

What a f'ng clown show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Be ready to get ignored by that poster, who doesn't come back to address when they are wrong. It's just potshots in the dark. Sound and fury, signifying nothing, and certainly not based on reality.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Be ready to get ignored by that poster, who doesn't come back to address when they are wrong. It's just potshots in the dark. Sound and fury, signifying nothing, and certainly not based on reality.

Ah yes, the last person you would want to listen to is the person who knows the most about it.

The current state of this country is testament to that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember telling my friend in January 2025 that Kennedy would eventually do more harm than Musk. She didn't agree but I think i'm right.

For those arguing for tanning beds as if they're some health product, do you actually use them? How many people use these? I can see advocating use of saunas perhaps.

HE uses them so he advocates for them. He believes he is infallible and knows better.

No, but it’s obvious that the criticism is exaggerated. I would go so far as to say driving to them is more dangerous than their actual use.

It’s about resetting our standards on what we shrug off and what we fret about needlessly. In part because we do worse than any other peer country on pretty much every health metric, so it’s worth questioning the reigning pedagogy.

Do other countries' public health ministers advocate the use of tanning beds?

What you gotta understand is that you can't deal with Vitamin D problems any other way than by toasting yourself like a piece of sausage in a gas station hot fryer. You can't get it by taking a pill, because that doesn't work even though does, and PILLS BAD. ARTIFICIAL UVA AND UVB LAMPS GOOD. That's not skin cancer, that's FREEDOM LESION.

And especially worthwhile to start the process as a minor! Yay, more time to create freedom lesions!

We have massive vitamin D deficiency and the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But keep defending the status quo.

Why don't we all have rickets then?

Growing up I had a friend whose parents grew up in Northern Canada where it is not sunny. Her father had rickets as a child and was bow-legged as a result.

Where are all the cases today if this is such a massive problem?

Anonymous wrote:

Of course he's disengaged! He's like your weird uncle who just wants to prattle on about his one weird theory. He hits the same notes over and over: vaccines bad, there is a dietary or exercise cure for everything, especially mental health or neurological syndromes, raw is best, traditional medicine is suspect. Along with this is the idea that your sickness is your own fault. He is not planning for emergencies because he thinks you shouldn't get sick in the first place! He doesn't believe in chance happenings or accidents. He is determined to create a world of his ideas and is doing it.

Anonymous wrote:
"Massive" is one of those red flag words that tell you someone is likely going off the rails about facts.

“Experts warn this is just the beginning,” reads the post that ultimately never merits a follow-up piece.

"Massive" is one of those red flag words that tell you someone is likely going off the rails about facts.