Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m more curious about how much time people have vs the cost. Between parents’ work and kids’ activities and school; how is everyone traveling every freaking break? My high schoolers don’t want to jet set somewhere for a 4 day weekend, they want to catch their breath with school work. 6 weeks off in the summer and you work in the U.S? How? No, like really. Tell me your secrets.
I'm one of the points travelers from upthread. The answer is a combination of having liberal leave policies at work, and having children who are preferably in elementary school and maybe middle. Once your kids are in high school, you are limited to winter and summer break for longer trips, and MAYBE thanksgiving for a short break.
My kids are 7, 10 and 14. I've been traveling mostly with the older two for a few years, but now that the oldest entered high school, I know the config will change. He will have commitments during spring break and will want to use T'giving break to recharge. So, I won't be planning for his travel outside of winter and summer breaks. I will switch to traveling with the younger set of kids at other times.
I’m confused… you left the youngest home while traveling with the older kids? Isn’t that super unfair? And now the oldest gets left home? You do you but it sounds like you never adjusted to having kids and full-time parenting if you’re forcing your kids to adjust to your travel schedule and leaving specific kids out if it doesn’t work for you.
The youngest is not old enough for intense international travel so he stays home with my husband. I don't have enough points to support tickets for five people, and the youngest is not fit for that type of travel yet. We usually have car trips to the beach or shortish domestic trips for all five of us at some point during the year.
I don't look at fairness as giving everyone the same thing at the same time - it wouldn't be fair to keep the older two homebound just because the youngest isn't fit for travel yet, and it is boring to make everyone function at the speed of the youngest one. The oldest will be heavily into his high school stuff in a year or two and unavailable for traveling much, and then I will begin traveling with the youngest and the middle one instead. Everyone gets their turn...
I don't quite understand the point about forcing kids to adjust to my travel schedule - if anything, they are forcing me to adjust to theirs since I have to schedule travel during their school breaks.
Anonymous wrote:I’m more curious about how much time people have vs the cost. Between parents’ work and kids’ activities and school; how is everyone traveling every freaking break? My high schoolers don’t want to jet set somewhere for a 4 day weekend, they want to catch their breath with school work. 6 weeks off in the summer and you work in the U.S? How? No, like really. Tell me your secrets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m more curious about how much time people have vs the cost. Between parents’ work and kids’ activities and school; how is everyone traveling every freaking break? My high schoolers don’t want to jet set somewhere for a 4 day weekend, they want to catch their breath with school work. 6 weeks off in the summer and you work in the U.S? How? No, like really. Tell me your secrets.
I'm one of the points travelers from upthread. The answer is a combination of having liberal leave policies at work, and having children who are preferably in elementary school and maybe middle. Once your kids are in high school, you are limited to winter and summer break for longer trips, and MAYBE thanksgiving for a short break.
My kids are 7, 10 and 14. I've been traveling mostly with the older two for a few years, but now that the oldest entered high school, I know the config will change. He will have commitments during spring break and will want to use T'giving break to recharge. So, I won't be planning for his travel outside of winter and summer breaks. I will switch to traveling with the younger set of kids at other times.
I’m confused… you left the youngest home while traveling with the older kids? Isn’t that super unfair? And now the oldest gets left home? You do you but it sounds like you never adjusted to having kids and full-time parenting if you’re forcing your kids to adjust to your travel schedule and leaving specific kids out if it doesn’t work for you.
Anonymous wrote:I mean if you have older kids not old but just old enough, you just can't sit home all year long you know? We stick around for holidays but if we never went out of town for fun I'd go out of my mind! So would my kids.
You have to figure out a way to do some travel!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m more curious about how much time people have vs the cost. Between parents’ work and kids’ activities and school; how is everyone traveling every freaking break? My high schoolers don’t want to jet set somewhere for a 4 day weekend, they want to catch their breath with school work. 6 weeks off in the summer and you work in the U.S? How? No, like really. Tell me your secrets.
I'm one of the points travelers from upthread. The answer is a combination of having liberal leave policies at work, and having children who are preferably in elementary school and maybe middle. Once your kids are in high school, you are limited to winter and summer break for longer trips, and MAYBE thanksgiving for a short break.
My kids are 7, 10 and 14. I've been traveling mostly with the older two for a few years, but now that the oldest entered high school, I know the config will change. He will have commitments during spring break and will want to use T'giving break to recharge. So, I won't be planning for his travel outside of winter and summer breaks. I will switch to traveling with the younger set of kids at other times.
Anonymous wrote:Gift Link on making money with CC.
I have personally made about 10 k in cash over the past 6 years and about 60k in travel. That's without spending a dollar more than what I would have,
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/business/credit-cards-churners.html?unlocked_article_code=1.tU8.VTv0.SeZmwCD6_Ppj&smid=url-share
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money OP. Lots and lots of money.
I am completely serious. The amount of money in this area is hard to comprehend, especially if you didn’t grow up here or somewhere like here. (I didn’t, and I’m still coming to new understanding of it even 20 years later.)
+1. Even the people who are playing the credit card game are likely spending a lot of money for the "free" travel because of the large spend requirements.
For most people, saving for a big trip takes time, it's not something they can do multiple times per year simply by forgoing other luxury items. I think this board in particular is distorted.
To the extent that they are speninding for the sake of travel points, yes. But one of the rules to the game is that you never spend differently than how you would have. Why does it matter if I use my Amex Gold card at Giant to buy 200 dollars in groceries (4x points) or pay cash?
Churning means you don't need to spend a lot on your CCs. I get a few CC's per year and the spend requirement for the bonus will be like $3000-6000 in 3-4 months. That's not a huge spend.
Sure maybe there are people who put $300,000 on their Amex each year and get a ton of points that way, but it's very possible to spend $1000-2000 per month and racks up hundreds of thousands of points each year be churning and getting bonuses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money OP. Lots and lots of money.
I am completely serious. The amount of money in this area is hard to comprehend, especially if you didn’t grow up here or somewhere like here. (I didn’t, and I’m still coming to new understanding of it even 20 years later.)
+1. Even the people who are playing the credit card game are likely spending a lot of money for the "free" travel because of the large spend requirements.
For most people, saving for a big trip takes time, it's not something they can do multiple times per year simply by forgoing other luxury items. I think this board in particular is distorted.
To the extent that they are speninding for the sake of travel points, yes. But one of the rules to the game is that you never spend differently than how you would have. Why does it matter if I use my Amex Gold card at Giant to buy 200 dollars in groceries (4x points) or pay cash?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money OP. Lots and lots of money.
I am completely serious. The amount of money in this area is hard to comprehend, especially if you didn’t grow up here or somewhere like here. (I didn’t, and I’m still coming to new understanding of it even 20 years later.)
+1. Even the people who are playing the credit card game are likely spending a lot of money for the "free" travel because of the large spend requirements.
For most people, saving for a big trip takes time, it's not something they can do multiple times per year simply by forgoing other luxury items. I think this board in particular is distorted.
To the extent that they are speninding for the sake of travel points, yes. But one of the rules to the game is that you never spend differently than how you would have. Why does it matter if I use my Amex Gold card at Giant to buy 200 dollars in groceries (4x points) or pay cash?
Anonymous wrote:I’m more curious about how much time people have vs the cost. Between parents’ work and kids’ activities and school; how is everyone traveling every freaking break? My high schoolers don’t want to jet set somewhere for a 4 day weekend, they want to catch their breath with school work. 6 weeks off in the summer and you work in the U.S? How? No, like really. Tell me your secrets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Money OP. Lots and lots of money.
I am completely serious. The amount of money in this area is hard to comprehend, especially if you didn’t grow up here or somewhere like here. (I didn’t, and I’m still coming to new understanding of it even 20 years later.)
+1. Even the people who are playing the credit card game are likely spending a lot of money for the "free" travel because of the large spend requirements.
For most people, saving for a big trip takes time, it's not something they can do multiple times per year simply by forgoing other luxury items. I think this board in particular is distorted.
Anonymous wrote:Money OP. Lots and lots of money.
I am completely serious. The amount of money in this area is hard to comprehend, especially if you didn’t grow up here or somewhere like here. (I didn’t, and I’m still coming to new understanding of it even 20 years later.)