Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

So much jelly. How fat are you?

I love how people call Sydney Sweeney critics ugly and fat, as if the inverse, liking a rat-faced blonde somehow makes you...attractive?

The people who jack off to a MAGA actress and white-knight for Sid from Ice Age on a message board are the ones who sound fat and unappealing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never seen her face. I’ve seen her boobs, and Kylie Jenner’s boobs are much better.

Kylie Jenner's nipples are disgusting. They look like brown dinner plates.

Kylie’s boobs are fake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never seen her face. I’ve seen her boobs, and Kylie Jenner’s boobs are much better.

LOL
+1

Kylie Jenner has brown blood in her so when they come for them they will come for her.

They will not come for MAGA whitey Airan Nation loving Sweeney.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

So much jelly. How fat are you?

Anonymous wrote:Jennifer Lawrence's interview with Fallon: 500,000 views

Sydney's interview with Colbert, posted only a day earlier: 63,000 views (and nearly as many downvotes as upvotes)

🤭

Even with her MAGA fanbase, Sydney's appeal just doesn't attract viewers the way someone with true charisma, star power and talent does, like Jlaw

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:17+ pages to debate the appeal of a young blonde actress with big boobs and a thin waist.

Why such low beauty standards? Her is face not attractive and that is what mainly determines whether someone is actually good looking.

Having sex appeal is not just about being good looking. The women in here desperately trying to figure out what men find appealing, or what they thing they should find appealing, is pretty funny. Guaranteed most of these women have zero sex appeal themselves.

Who cares what men find appealing? They have terrible taste.

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney is not naturally attractive. I get people have different standards/tastes but please look at her before photos. Even her after is meh. There are many many many young, blonde, blue-eyed, big-boobed, small-waisted women. Many of them conservative. Many with an actual pretty face. The point people are making is that SHE specifically is not attractive. She is overexposed and overrated. My hunch is that her team slowly started playing into the Maga darling narrative to gain a fervent fan base. All the nonsense that libs are outraged at this and that thing she did or said is manufactured. No one cares that much about her. She is a passing thought of butterface with big boobs.

Agree her team are trying to find her a Maga fan base niche. Good luck with that. Most of the country--and that includes independents, conservatives, liberals, and those with no political leanings--doesn't really seem to care one way or the other.

Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal who think SS is a solid actress. Other than “anyone but you”, she’s legit. If she’s truly maga that’s unfortunate, but none of this impacts me watching her.

Stop putting all of us liberals in one basket. We know how to think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:17+ pages to debate the appeal of a young blonde actress with big boobs and a thin waist.

Why such low beauty standards? Her is face not attractive and that is what mainly determines whether someone is actually good looking.

Having sex appeal is not just about being good looking. The women in here desperately trying to figure out what men find appealing, or what they thing they should find appealing, is pretty funny. Guaranteed most of these women have zero sex appeal themselves.

Who cares what men find appealing? They have terrible taste.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:17+ pages to debate the appeal of a young blonde actress with big boobs and a thin waist.

Why such low beauty standards? Her is face not attractive and that is what mainly determines whether someone is actually good looking.

Having sex appeal is not just about being good looking. The women in here desperately trying to figure out what men find appealing, or what they thing they should find appealing, is pretty funny. Guaranteed most of these women have zero sex appeal themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Lol. I think you protest too much.