Anonymous wrote:Not having AP class designations did not affect DD or any of her classmates. Colleges know the school. AP classes are all about breadth and no depth anyway. DD still took AP exams and reviewed a few things on her own and earned 5s on several exams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.
Exactly. Research and writing are the backbone of college-level history. The AP classes will give students a good factual base and minimal analytical skills, but nothing like a good college course with a strong lecturer. The only whole book AP kids will read is the AP textbook.
College history is, of course, absolutely nothing like that.
Our kid's AP history courses required a lot of research and writing, so I guess it depends on how the teacher approaches the subject. I actually felt they under-emphasized maximizing the test results and would have appreciated a bit more focus on that.
Also, of course AP isn't the same a college history class. It isn't meant to be. It's meant to get you out of the intro survey courses with 500 freshman.
Did they research beyond a few primary documents and the AP textbook? Did they read any full histories from well-known historians and write about the differences in historical interpretation between them? Did they study validity of historical evidence? Did they write beyond short answers and DBQs? Great for them if the course offered any of that.
I'm glad they enjoyed the AP history classes, but what they are now (most of the time in most schools) is nothing like the intro history courses I took at an Ivy long ago.
Anonymous wrote:Sucks.
We are getting killed by publics on college admissions. Might as well give up on T20.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP classes are the equivalent of an online course from University of Phoenix.
The anti-AP crowd is the weirdest group of people I’ve seen on DCUM since the virulent anti-redshirters.
Not at all. People are just pointing out that AP is a high school level class, focused on test prep, that is sold by a for profit company that controls the public high school curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP classes are the equivalent of an online course from University of Phoenix.
The anti-AP crowd is the weirdest group of people I’ve seen on DCUM since the virulent anti-redshirters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.
Exactly. Research and writing are the backbone of college-level history. The AP classes will give students a good factual base and minimal analytical skills, but nothing like a good college course with a strong lecturer. The only whole book AP kids will read is the AP textbook.
College history is, of course, absolutely nothing like that.
Our kid's AP history courses required a lot of research and writing, so I guess it depends on how the teacher approaches the subject. I actually felt they under-emphasized maximizing the test results and would have appreciated a bit more focus on that.
Also, of course AP isn't the same a college history class. It isn't meant to be. It's meant to get you out of the intro survey courses with 500 freshman.
Did they research beyond a few primary documents and the AP textbook? Did they read any full histories from well-known historians and write about the differences in historical interpretation between them? Did they study validity of historical evidence? Did they write beyond short answers and DBQs? Great for them if the course offered any of that.
I'm glad they enjoyed the AP history classes, but what they are now (most of the time in most schools) is nothing like the intro history courses I took at an Ivy long ago.
The intro history courses at Ivies are nothing like the intro history courses you took long ago either.
Anonymous wrote:AP classes are the equivalent of an online course from University of Phoenix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.
Exactly. Research and writing are the backbone of college-level history. The AP classes will give students a good factual base and minimal analytical skills, but nothing like a good college course with a strong lecturer. The only whole book AP kids will read is the AP textbook.
College history is, of course, absolutely nothing like that.
Our kid's AP history courses required a lot of research and writing, so I guess it depends on how the teacher approaches the subject. I actually felt they under-emphasized maximizing the test results and would have appreciated a bit more focus on that.
Also, of course AP isn't the same a college history class. It isn't meant to be. It's meant to get you out of the intro survey courses with 500 freshman.
Did they research beyond a few primary documents and the AP textbook? Did they read any full histories from well-known historians and write about the differences in historical interpretation between them? Did they study validity of historical evidence? Did they write beyond short answers and DBQs? Great for them if the course offered any of that.
I'm glad they enjoyed the AP history classes, but what they are now (most of the time in most schools) is nothing like the intro history courses I took at an Ivy long ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.
Exactly. Research and writing are the backbone of college-level history. The AP classes will give students a good factual base and minimal analytical skills, but nothing like a good college course with a strong lecturer. The only whole book AP kids will read is the AP textbook.
College history is, of course, absolutely nothing like that.
Our kid's AP history courses required a lot of research and writing, so I guess it depends on how the teacher approaches the subject. I actually felt they under-emphasized maximizing the test results and would have appreciated a bit more focus on that.
Also, of course AP isn't the same a college history class. It isn't meant to be. It's meant to get you out of the intro survey courses with 500 freshman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.
Exactly. Research and writing are the backbone of college-level history. The AP classes will give students a good factual base and minimal analytical skills, but nothing like a good college course with a strong lecturer. The only whole book AP kids will read is the AP textbook.
College history is, of course, absolutely nothing like that.
Anonymous wrote:Our private offers AP and I am of mixed opinion about them. Prior to taking an AP history course she took a regular course at the same school and honestly found the non AP course more challenging and intellectually stimulating than the AP course which really focused on maximizing the AP score. A lot more factual content was covered in AP, but the essays were more challenging in the regular class because writing style and good research was emphasized more in the non-AP class.
But on the other hand I”m still glad our school offers them because they are rigorous enough as college preparatory classes and we don’t have to worry that college admissions will wonder at the lack of APs. DC may be applying to UK schools and 5s on certain AP scores are required. So it”s nice to have the curriculum covered in class so that DC doesn’t have to spend time outside of class self studying for them and can have more time for extracurriculars/free time.