Anonymous
06/03/2025 22:28
Subject: Re:What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
NP. As far as I can tell, nothing that gets them close to the presidency, unfortunately. Though they are definitely worked up about protecting boys in girls sports.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:54
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]Harris was pretty close to being President.
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]Harris was pretty close to being President.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:48
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Believe I found it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLzYPbtklGs
If so, this is really cringe
Yep, thats it. Awful.
Hilarious that some brilliant Democrat thought it would be an effective ad.
It’s hilarious that they think that men just aren’t voting for Harris because she’s a woman. I guess all those people who voted for Hillary, Obama, Klobuchar, and Warren in the DNC primaries over the years - the same primaries that Harris bowed out of before they even began in 2020 - were sexist and racist for not voting for Harris.
Maybe no one really likes her that much and she’s a terrible politician. Seems like a reasonable answer.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:19
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Believe I found it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLzYPbtklGs
If so, this is really cringe
Yep, thats it. Awful.
Hilarious that some brilliant Democrat thought it would be an effective ad.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:13
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Believe I found it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLzYPbtklGs
If so, this is really cringe
Yep, thats it. Awful.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:09
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:The daily had a story on this today showing a massive shift among all ethnicities towards the GOP, with the Dems only picking up on the college educated.
This is true even in dnc strongholds like the Bronx. Was an interesting 30 minutes.
The woke scolds have ruined the left's brand.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 21:05
Subject: Re:What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Now is the time democrats. We have to pass amnesty for 17,000,000 immigrants. We owe them this. It will never happen again!!!
Screw the deficit or budgets. Screw the US middle class. Focus on helping immigrants !!!!!
The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission.”
—Ted Kennedy, 1965 Immigration Bill (Hart-Celler)
“This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”
— Ted Kennedy on the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli Bill
Screw the deficit or budgets. Screw the US middle class. Focus on helping immigrants !!!!!
The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission.”
—Ted Kennedy, 1965 Immigration Bill (Hart-Celler)
“This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”
— Ted Kennedy on the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli Bill
Anonymous
06/03/2025 20:53
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Believe I found it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLzYPbtklGs
If so, this is really cringe
Anonymous
06/03/2025 20:52
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 20:46
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions.
What are you referring to here?
I'm referring to a campaign ad that Kamala released with a bunch of gay actors repeatedly saying "I'm a man" and "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris." It was an uncomfortable watch. I imagine it must have felt like how we as women would feel if they had Ellen DeGeneres dress up in a floral dress with high heels, talk about how she liked to feel pretty and that voting for Trump made her feel feminine.
Ah- off to google that. Thx.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 18:48
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The daily had a story on this today showing a massive shift among all ethnicities towards the GOP, with the Dems only picking up on the college educated.
This is true even in dnc strongholds like the Bronx. Was an interesting 30 minutes.
Did they say why they wanted to be fired, not promoted, and/or deported?
They basically took the working class vote for granted and think that economic populism may be the answer
Anonymous
06/03/2025 18:26
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]
So California for doing whatever it wants and it's "their business", but Obergefell for pushing gay marriage nationally?
Do I have that correct, lefties?[/quote]
Many social issues being determined on a state level makes sense in our very diverse and politically divided country. That's my personal opinion. If you think most or all issues should be settled in a uniform manner across all 50 states at the direction of our Federal Government, that's ok too. I respect your right to have your own opinion. Americans used to respect each other's opinions and political discourse among folks with differing opinions was possible before the current breed of hyper-partisan freaks came along.
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]
So California for doing whatever it wants and it's "their business", but Obergefell for pushing gay marriage nationally?
Do I have that correct, lefties?[/quote]
Many social issues being determined on a state level makes sense in our very diverse and politically divided country. That's my personal opinion. If you think most or all issues should be settled in a uniform manner across all 50 states at the direction of our Federal Government, that's ok too. I respect your right to have your own opinion. Americans used to respect each other's opinions and political discourse among folks with differing opinions was possible before the current breed of hyper-partisan freaks came along.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 18:20
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
Anonymous wrote:The daily had a story on this today showing a massive shift among all ethnicities towards the GOP, with the Dems only picking up on the college educated.
This is true even in dnc strongholds like the Bronx. Was an interesting 30 minutes.
Did they say why they wanted to be fired, not promoted, and/or deported?
Anonymous
06/03/2025 18:17
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
The daily had a story on this today showing a massive shift among all ethnicities towards the GOP, with the Dems only picking up on the college educated.
This is true even in dnc strongholds like the Bronx. Was an interesting 30 minutes.
This is true even in dnc strongholds like the Bronx. Was an interesting 30 minutes.
Anonymous
06/03/2025 18:08
Subject: What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]
So California for doing whatever it wants and it's "their business", but Obergefell for pushing gay marriage nationally?
Do I have that correct, lefties?
Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom. Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]
All of those issues dominate the democratic agenda. In California, a boy was allowed to compete in and win the women's division of a track tournament. This is what blue state people want. [/quote]
If a majority Californians choose to permit biological males playing in female sports, that's their business. No Californian politician will be POTUS anytime soon due to how California is perceived to be too liberal for the taste of too many swing voters in swing states.
Based on Trump's history in politics, he will struggle to maintain job approval support from the swing voters who determine national elections and when that support is lacking for the sitting POTUS, the incumbent party has no chance of winning the POTUS election. Odds of Trump maintaining enough swing voter support through 2028 to give the GOP a chance in the next POTUS election is in the 10% to 20% range so while nothing is guaranteed, odds are the strongly in the favor of a Dem being our next POTUS; it just won't be a Californian politician. [/quote]
So California for doing whatever it wants and it's "their business", but Obergefell for pushing gay marriage nationally?
Do I have that correct, lefties?