Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Vanderbilt
Any of the SEC schools for OOS kids
NYU
USC (when I took the SATs they were doing the stuff Chicago does now- sending the biggest and most mailings of anyone and generally acting desperate)
Nope. Vanderbilt has been competitive and difficult to get into for a long time.
Anonymous wrote:basically you needed a pulse and a functioning brainstem to get into Maryland late 80s/early 90s That changed pretty rapidly over the next decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BU and BC transitioned in the mid to late 80’s by John Silber and Doug Flutie. Silber was a dynamic President of BU and Flutie won the Heisman Trophy at BC in mid 80’s. Don’t know what accounts for NEU popularity?
This is how NEU grew in popularity: https://www.bostonmagazine.com/2014/08/26/how...he-college-rankings/
Kudos to NEU. It basically says NEU played by the rules fair and square (and made vast improvements) while others were cheating.
"Meanwhile, other schools that couldn’t successfully game the system were trying to cheat their way to the top.
In 2008, Baylor University told newly admitted students that they’d receive a $300 campus-bookstore credit if they retook their SATs, and $1,000 a year in student aid if the scores improved by more than 50 points. In 2009, an administrator at Clemson University, whose president shared Freeland’s rankings fixation, admitted the school misrepresented financial information and purposefully rated institutions low on the peer assessments.
In 2011, Iona College officials admitted to misreporting acceptance rates, SAT scores, graduation rates, and alumni donation amounts over the course of a decade. In 2012, Claremont McKenna College copped to misreporting SAT scores for several years. Also in 2012, George Washington University admitted to inflating the percentage of students who graduated at the top of their high school classes, and Emory University said it had misreported high school GPAs for four years and SAT scores for nearly a dozen years."
UCBerkeley and Columbia are some of the recent high profile examples.
I almost think it's might be Emory haters who keep posting the article.
Probably a Northeastern or BC grad. They have a fixation against Emory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BU and BC transitioned in the mid to late 80’s by John Silber and Doug Flutie. Silber was a dynamic President of BU and Flutie won the Heisman Trophy at BC in mid 80’s. Don’t know what accounts for NEU popularity?
This is how NEU grew in popularity: https://www.bostonmagazine.com/2014/08/26/how...he-college-rankings/
Kudos to NEU. It basically says NEU played by the rules fair and square (and made vast improvements) while others were cheating.
"Meanwhile, other schools that couldn’t successfully game the system were trying to cheat their way to the top.
In 2008, Baylor University told newly admitted students that they’d receive a $300 campus-bookstore credit if they retook their SATs, and $1,000 a year in student aid if the scores improved by more than 50 points. In 2009, an administrator at Clemson University, whose president shared Freeland’s rankings fixation, admitted the school misrepresented financial information and purposefully rated institutions low on the peer assessments.
In 2011, Iona College officials admitted to misreporting acceptance rates, SAT scores, graduation rates, and alumni donation amounts over the course of a decade. In 2012, Claremont McKenna College copped to misreporting SAT scores for several years. Also in 2012, George Washington University admitted to inflating the percentage of students who graduated at the top of their high school classes, and Emory University said it had misreported high school GPAs for four years and SAT scores for nearly a dozen years."
UCBerkeley and Columbia are some of the recent high profile examples.
I almost think it's might be Emory haters who keep posting the article.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GWU- all they did was raise tuition and it became more popular.
GWU has always been relatively expensive. But no matter what they charge, they remain "couldn't get into Georgetown".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michigan.
I graduated college in early 2000s
I had a 3.8, 2 AP classes, 32 ACT, was on one varsity sport (not captain). That’s it. I was in-state, but still. No way would I get in today.
Similar story, but UVA. Had a 3.75, 1390 SAT, had a number of ECs. But 100% not get into UVA with that profile now.
But a student with the same capabilities as you had back then would probably have a 4.6 and a 1500+. Grades and test scores are incredibly inflated now.
Where do your kids go to school that grades are inflated????? Not our experience at all.
It is everywhere
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michigan.
I graduated college in early 2000s
I had a 3.8, 2 AP classes, 32 ACT, was on one varsity sport (not captain). That’s it. I was in-state, but still. No way would I get in today.
Similar story, but UVA. Had a 3.75, 1390 SAT, had a number of ECs. But 100% not get into UVA with that profile now.
But a student with the same capabilities as you had back then would probably have a 4.6 and a 1500+. Grades and test scores are incredibly inflated now.
Where do your kids go to school that grades are inflated????? Not our experience at all.
Anonymous wrote:Northwestern and BU were my safeties. Northwestern offered to hold a full-ride aid package for a year, which was nice.