Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the first time since DA folded, it appears that GA might be starting to push back a little. It is no secret that many DOCs in ECNL dont like the administration structure of ECNL but did not believe they had much of a choice because of the ECNL dominance.
While the MLSN partnership is not earth shattering, it does have some bearing. USSF would much rather support MLSN and GA than ECNL
If GA gives ECNL DOCs almost anything (MLSN for boys as an example, more national development oppotunities) some of them will jump. ECNL still has the clear edge but maybe there is a slight shift coming.
My money is that more ECNL clubs move to GA than vice versa. Like/kind/quality who knows but certainly better than last few years.
Spot on. I do think however that blue looking to jump will have to decide what's best for their program. Lots of clubs with ECNLB & GA.
Hopefully this new landscape pushes ECNL to do right by club entry based on merit and not by what the local clubs dictate. Looking at you SLSG and FC Stars.. Some of the founding ECNL clubs try to limit competition as they are aware that if it wasn’t for the badge, kids would run
While I am not prognosticating they will jump, I know that SLSG has quite a bit of friction with ECNL due to their MLSN affiliation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the first time since DA folded, it appears that GA might be starting to push back a little. It is no secret that many DOCs in ECNL dont like the administration structure of ECNL but did not believe they had much of a choice because of the ECNL dominance.
While the MLSN partnership is not earth shattering, it does have some bearing. USSF would much rather support MLSN and GA than ECNL
If GA gives ECNL DOCs almost anything (MLSN for boys as an example, more national development oppotunities) some of them will jump. ECNL still has the clear edge but maybe there is a slight shift coming.
My money is that more ECNL clubs move to GA than vice versa. Like/kind/quality who knows but certainly better than last few years.
Spot on. I do think however that blue looking to jump will have to decide what's best for their program. Lots of clubs with ECNLB & GA.
Hopefully this new landscape pushes ECNL to do right by club entry based on merit and not by what the local clubs dictate. Looking at you SLSG and FC Stars.. Some of the founding ECNL clubs try to limit competition as they are aware that if it wasn’t for the badge, kids would run
Anonymous wrote:For the first time since DA folded, it appears that GA might be starting to push back a little. It is no secret that many DOCs in ECNL dont like the administration structure of ECNL but did not believe they had much of a choice because of the ECNL dominance.
While the MLSN partnership is not earth shattering, it does have some bearing. USSF would much rather support MLSN and GA than ECNL
If GA gives ECNL DOCs almost anything (MLSN for boys as an example, more national development oppotunities) some of them will jump. ECNL still has the clear edge but maybe there is a slight shift coming.
My money is that more ECNL clubs move to GA than vice versa. Like/kind/quality who knows but certainly better than last few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may not be realistic, but I don't know any who'd say they'd turn down a professional opportunity.
I know of at least one NWYNT player (actually played for the team) that turned down a pro opportunity because college was important. It happens.
Haven't heard from this guy in a while.
Yea right, players that can play pro would ever choose to play in college.
😆 😂 😆 😂 😆 😂 😆 😂 😆
Anonymous wrote:Girls should only be focued on a career earning money, NOT playing pro. Some of the best to ever play are 30 and broke. Full stop.
Get a free education and become a Dr..... pay your bills and chill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may not be realistic, but I don't know any who'd say they'd turn down a professional opportunity.
I know of at least one NWYNT player (actually played for the team) that turned down a pro opportunity because college was important. It happens.
Haven't heard from this guy in a while.
Yea right, players that can play pro would ever choose to play in college.
😆 😂 😆 😂 😆 😂 😆 😂 😆
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are cases of people chasing a dream when they are young and able. There's always time to figure out the career route.
It's not crazy.
I think the point is the VAST majority of the best prep players go to college vs going straight to the pros. How many straight to pros from high school (or earlier in very rare cases) have even happened, and then, if they do happen, how successful were they? I am not sure I even have to take off my shoes to count them.
For last WC cycle I am not sure more than one or two USWNT skipped college. A few more this cycle probably but still just a small handful.
Anonymous wrote:There are cases of people chasing a dream when they are young and able. There's always time to figure out the career route.
It's not crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may not be realistic, but I don't know any who'd say they'd turn down a professional opportunity.
I know of at least one NWYNT player (actually played for the team) that turned down a pro opportunity because college was important. It happens.