Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal.

Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences.

Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.

Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions.

We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.

The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad.

He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?

Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract.

He probably changed it because SHE wasn't following the original NDA. What she did was horrible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal.

Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences.

Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.

Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions.

We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.

The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad.

He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?

Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

DM reporting she got $80m.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal.

Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences.

Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.

Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions.

We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.

The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad.

He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?

Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract.

No it's not logical. If he was being logical then he wouldn't have told her the real reason he was leaving the deal. He and you can complain as much as he wants but he's the one who made it personal and jumbled the cases.

He didn’t leave the deal. He paused it. Jolie is the one who ultimately left the deal. Her lawyers sent a letter to Brad’s lawyers that they would no longer sell to him. They were negotiating with Stoli at that point.

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal.

Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences.

Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.

Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions.

We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.

The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad.

He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?

Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract.

No it's not logical. If he was being logical then he wouldn't have told her the real reason he was leaving the deal. He and you can complain as much as he wants but he's the one who made it personal and jumbled the cases.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal.

Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences.

Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.

Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions.

We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.

The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad.

He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?

Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lack of understanding around DV and the misogyny in this thread doesn’t surprise me, but it’s still depressing.

It’s misogyny to criticize another woman? I’m sick of this mindset. We don’t have to blindly support another woman. I don’t support someone based on their gender if I believe their actions are wrong. We don’t like Angelina based on her actions, and her domestic violence allegations were never proven. Multiple law enforcement agencies declined to prosecute Brad after hearing Angelina’s story.