Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok thanks to whoever recommended The Consult podcast . They are pretty convinced it was a sadistic intruder.

The 30 keys given out to various contractors and the fact that not all doors and windows were locked shows plenty of opportunity for an intruder.

Yet no evidence of an intruder in the house, and strong evidence of a coverup by the family.

No evidence? Multiple people were in and of that house over those days. There’s no way they did a clean sweep and identified every finger print, hair, clothing fiber, etc. There’s no evidence because they didn’t even look.

Of course they looked! And the evidence just wasn’t there. Everything points towards it being a family member. Everything. Except it can’t be proven which one, so, it will never be solved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok thanks to whoever recommended The Consult podcast . They are pretty convinced it was a sadistic intruder.

The 30 keys given out to various contractors and the fact that not all doors and windows were locked shows plenty of opportunity for an intruder.

Yet no evidence of an intruder in the house, and strong evidence of a coverup by the family.

No evidence? Multiple people were in and of that house over those days. There’s no way they did a clean sweep and identified every finger print, hair, clothing fiber, etc. There’s no evidence because they didn’t even look.

Anonymous wrote:Ok thanks to whoever recommended The Consult podcast . They are pretty convinced it was a sadistic intruder.

The 30 keys given out to various contractors and the fact that not all doors and windows were locked shows plenty of opportunity for an intruder.

Yet no evidence of an intruder in the house, and strong evidence of a coverup by the family.

Ok thanks to whoever recommended The Consult podcast . They are pretty convinced it was a sadistic intruder.

The 30 keys given out to various contractors and the fact that not all doors and windows were locked shows plenty of opportunity for an intruder.

There were several things going on.

CSIs noted pajama pants too big for jonbenet containing fecal matter on the floor of her bedroom. They were thought, by the CSIs and investigative team, to belong to Burke.

Pasty was asked about a pair of jonbenets pants found in jonbenets bathroom containing fecal matter, which she attributed to poor wiping skills.

CSIs also noted feces found smeared on a box of chocolates.

A current housekeeper reported previously finding a pile of feces in jonbenets bed and it was not clear who had deposited the material.

A former housekeeper reported that Burke had smeared feces on the walls three years prior when he was six years old and patsy was undergoing chemotherapy. She had been instructed by patsys mother, who was living with them, to clean it up.

So it’s possible that jonbenet had toilet training issues and Burke was showing related behavioral issues. Either way, it doesn’t really support an intruder theory - it shows preexisting disturbing behaviors. And that the parents hadn’t seen or cleaned up feces around the house.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

No, the feces were noted by investigators. There was a pair of pajama pants too large for jonbenet on the bedroom of her floor containing fecal matter, as well as feces smeared on a box of chocolates. It was noted by investigators in their sweep of the house but they did not understand its possible significance at the time. It’s not misinformation.

A housekeeper also reported feces in jonbenets bed in the past in addition to Burke smearing feces on the wall when he was younger during his mother’s cancer treatment.

Patsy said the pants in the bathroom were Jonbenet's. They were taken for testing. The feces in the bed were hers, as far as anyone knows.
The chocolate box was not taken for testing, so no-one knows if it was actually feces or melted chocolate.

From Holly Smith: "One poignant find that she does recall was a red satin box with what looked like JonBenet's secret stash of candy.

She found something else in the room, however, which raised an immediate red flag. Smith says most of the panties in JonBenet's dresser drawers had been soiled with fecal material."

As stated, there was one Burke feces-smearing incident four years earlier. Not exactly a smoking gun since JB clearly had issues, Patsy claimed with poor wiping, around the time of her death.

Sounds like JB was severely constipated.

Yeah, that would be my guess. Apparently she had a lot of pediatrician visits, for various things. That doesn't suggest a mother who doesn't love her child.

I can see a kid like this, at this age, realizing her underpants were soiled and stuffing them in the drawer to hide the evidence and getting a new pair. This seems like a normal situation for this problem. It doesn’t point to a brother doing this maliciously to a sister. A 6 yr old isn’t exactly going to do a load of laundry to hide the evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

No, the feces were noted by investigators. There was a pair of pajama pants too large for jonbenet on the bedroom of her floor containing fecal matter, as well as feces smeared on a box of chocolates. It was noted by investigators in their sweep of the house but they did not understand its possible significance at the time. It’s not misinformation.

A housekeeper also reported feces in jonbenets bed in the past in addition to Burke smearing feces on the wall when he was younger during his mother’s cancer treatment.

Patsy said the pants in the bathroom were Jonbenet's. They were taken for testing. The feces in the bed were hers, as far as anyone knows.
The chocolate box was not taken for testing, so no-one knows if it was actually feces or melted chocolate.

From Holly Smith: "One poignant find that she does recall was a red satin box with what looked like JonBenet's secret stash of candy.

She found something else in the room, however, which raised an immediate red flag. Smith says most of the panties in JonBenet's dresser drawers had been soiled with fecal material."

As stated, there was one Burke feces-smearing incident four years earlier. Not exactly a smoking gun since JB clearly had issues, Patsy claimed with poor wiping, around the time of her death.

Sounds like JB was severely constipated.

Yeah, that would be my guess. Apparently she had a lot of pediatrician visits, for various things. That doesn't suggest a mother who doesn't love her child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

No, the feces were noted by investigators. There was a pair of pajama pants too large for jonbenet on the bedroom of her floor containing fecal matter, as well as feces smeared on a box of chocolates. It was noted by investigators in their sweep of the house but they did not understand its possible significance at the time. It’s not misinformation.

A housekeeper also reported feces in jonbenets bed in the past in addition to Burke smearing feces on the wall when he was younger during his mother’s cancer treatment.

Patsy said the pants in the bathroom were Jonbenet's. They were taken for testing. The feces in the bed were hers, as far as anyone knows.
The chocolate box was not taken for testing, so no-one knows if it was actually feces or melted chocolate.

From Holly Smith: "One poignant find that she does recall was a red satin box with what looked like JonBenet's secret stash of candy.

She found something else in the room, however, which raised an immediate red flag. Smith says most of the panties in JonBenet's dresser drawers had been soiled with fecal material."

As stated, there was one Burke feces-smearing incident four years earlier. Not exactly a smoking gun since JB clearly had issues, Patsy claimed with poor wiping, around the time of her death.

Sounds like JB was severely constipated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

No, the feces were noted by investigators. There was a pair of pajama pants too large for jonbenet on the bedroom of her floor containing fecal matter, as well as feces smeared on a box of chocolates. It was noted by investigators in their sweep of the house but they did not understand its possible significance at the time. It’s not misinformation.

A housekeeper also reported feces in jonbenets bed in the past in addition to Burke smearing feces on the wall when he was younger during his mother’s cancer treatment.

Patsy said the pants in the bathroom were Jonbenet's. They were taken for testing. The feces in the bed were hers, as far as anyone knows.
The chocolate box was not taken for testing, so no-one knows if it was actually feces or melted chocolate.

From Holly Smith: "One poignant find that she does recall was a red satin box with what looked like JonBenet's secret stash of candy.

She found something else in the room, however, which raised an immediate red flag. Smith says most of the panties in JonBenet's dresser drawers had been soiled with fecal material."

As stated, there was one Burke feces-smearing incident four years earlier. Not exactly a smoking gun since JB clearly had issues, Patsy claimed with poor wiping, around the time of her death.

I guess no lie detectors were given

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

No, the feces were noted by investigators. There was a pair of pajama pants too large for jonbenet on the bedroom of her floor containing fecal matter, as well as feces smeared on a box of chocolates. It was noted by investigators in their sweep of the house but they did not understand its possible significance at the time. It’s not misinformation.

A housekeeper also reported feces in jonbenets bed in the past in addition to Burke smearing feces on the wall when he was younger during his mother’s cancer treatment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.

The wall-smearing incident happened four years earlier. No evidence at all that Burke had ongoing issues in this area. JB had issues with incontinence, bot urinary and fecal.

Anonymous wrote:Whenever killed her, the family definitely covered it up. The blanket from the dryer??

I agree the ransom note, blanket, and staging after the fact (ineffective hand ties) suggest family coverup. But we'll never know exactly what happened and who was responsible for the actual killing. Some accident or other involving Burke, maybe, but not enough concrete evidence to be sure.

Whenever killed her, the family definitely covered it up. The blanket from the dryer??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Former BFFs of the Ramseys wrote a long letter attributing the "failure of justice" to the corruption of the Boulder PD and the AG's office, but most of all to the Ramseys' failure to cooperate with authorities.

https://extras.denverpost.com/news/whiteltr.htm


They called for the Ramsey indictment to be unsealed, clearly think their former friends did it.

Eye opening letter. It's dry and hard to follow, but accuses the well-connected Ramsey legal team of using their influence and connections to throw up road blocks in the murder investigation. The authors even use the term "malfeasance" when outlining how the political establishment up to the Governor of Colorado and the prosecutors worked together to muddy the waters. The authors are careful to state how law enforcement worked hard to solve the case, but political machinations hampered their efforts.

You'd think the parents would have been in agony, believing their child's murderer was still out there. But never seemed to be. They obstructed the investigation at every turn.

They were distraught upon finding out Burke did it. The 911 call pointed to this. They had to go into survival mode to protect their remaining family.

Exactly. One person was not distraught: Burke. When they arranged for him to go to their friends house the day JB was missing, he grabbed his game boy and asked no questions. When a police officer went over to informally interview him, Burke said he was hungry and asked for a sandwich. Every family members picture was taken that day - Jon and patsy looked exhausted and anguished. Burke smiled.

There isn’t enough evidence to convict the family, and Burke was under 10 when it happened, but family involvement is pretty clear.

Those of us with autistic kids don't find Burke's reaction at all unusual. These kids live in their own world and are pretty emotionally detached as a rule.

Okay and it’s not a huge leap to believe that the brother who had a history of harming jonbenet and behaviors (like his fecal matter that was found in two places in her bedroom) was responsible for harming her and remaining detached from it.

And while Burke may have been on what would today be defined as the spectrum, he was verbal and in a mainstream classroom - so, high functioning so to speak. It was a lot less common for similarly afflicted kids to be diagnosed and treated with psychiatric medications in the 90s.

Misinformation--this is not true. The feces in the bed, well before the crime, were thought to be JB's who had a history of toileting problems (including having wet the bed the night of the crime). The candy box wasn't tested, might well have been melted chocolate. This is how untrue rumors spread. We don't even know if Burke hit JB with a golf club on purpose or by accident. I was hit in the face with a field hockey stick as a child. It was an accident.

According to the housekeeper, Burke smeared feces on the wall once when younger. Not a consistent thing by any means and as pointed out on this thread, associated with autism and sensory differences.
https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-fecal-smearing/

Maybe Burke did it, maybe he didn't. But please don't spread unsubstantiated rumors to back up your theories.