Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not up to date on all of this online lexicon. Can an incel be married with kids? Because I really doubt JD and his wife have a thriving sex life. A happy married guy who is getting laid all the time is not walking around this creepy and angry at women.

Can we not speculate on his sex life.
Please.
I beg you.

We’ve done that already:

Sofas 🛋️ , dolphins, 🐬 , I think the list will only get longer

Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though she's not a white person, she did incubate his children and raise them well. That really ticks a box for this dude. Fertility will overcome all sorts of problems as a human being, including her heritage.

Good god.

I keep seeing on social media that they had their kids with IVF. Is that something she's mentioned in the record? If yes, isolated, that's not terribly abnormal for a pair of yuppies in their 30s, but with everything else about him, it certainly raises an(other) eyebrow about his sexuality.

Vance is a millennial who grew up with Facebook and camera phones and seems to have been a boozer in the military and at OSU, yet there's literally zero record of him with co-eds before he married his wife, who he didn't meet until he was a 25 or 26 year old law student.

Womanizer like Trump = unacceptable, probable rapist
Married father with scandal-free past = weirdo, probably gay
Who exactly would you consider to have a normal past? Do you think your favorite Republican Mitt Romney left a trail of heartbroken coeds at college? And throwing the weird label around is a joke considering the Star Wars cantina coalition you're trying to unite.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though she's not a white person, she did incubate his children and raise them well. That really ticks a box for this dude. Fertility will overcome all sorts of problems as a human being, including her heritage.

Good god.

I keep seeing on social media that they had their kids with IVF. Is that something she's mentioned in the record? If yes, isolated, that's not terribly abnormal for a pair of yuppies in their 30s, but with everything else about him, it certainly raises an(other) eyebrow about his sexuality.

Vance is a millennial who grew up with Facebook and camera phones and seems to have been a boozer in the military and at OSU, yet there's literally zero record of him with co-eds before he married his wife, who he didn't meet until he was a 25 or 26 year old law student.

Womanizer like Trump = unacceptable, probable rapist
Married father with scandal-free past = weirdo, probably gay
Who exactly would you consider to have a normal past? Do you think your favorite Republican Mitt Romney left a trail of heartbroken coeds at college? And throwing the weird label around is a joke considering the Star Wars cantina coalition you're trying to unite.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though she's not a white person, she did incubate his children and raise them well. That really ticks a box for this dude. Fertility will overcome all sorts of problems as a human being, including her heritage.

Good god.

I keep seeing on social media that they had their kids with IVF. Is that something she's mentioned in the record? If yes, isolated, that's not terribly abnormal for a pair of yuppies in their 30s, but with everything else about him, it certainly raises an(other) eyebrow about his sexuality.

Vance is a millennial who grew up with Facebook and camera phones and seems to have been a boozer in the military and at OSU, yet there's literally zero record of him with co-eds before he married his wife, who he didn't meet until he was a 25 or 26 year old law student.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not up to date on all of this online lexicon. Can an incel be married with kids? Because I really doubt JD and his wife have a thriving sex life. A happy married guy who is getting laid all the time is not walking around this creepy and angry at women.

Can we not speculate on his sex life.
Please.
I beg you.

Anonymous wrote:I'm not up to date on all of this online lexicon. Can an incel be married with kids? Because I really doubt JD and his wife have a thriving sex life. A happy married guy who is getting laid all the time is not walking around this creepy and angry at women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a super liberal millennial, and I’m not loving this “weird” thing (which incidentally I have only heard about here on DCUM). I think of the word weird as being a quirky, interesting person (a la “Keep Portland Weird”) and love “weird” people. Calling someone weird in a bad way feels like what we’re trying to get away from - bullying, othering, shaming for being different.

Now that said, bullying, othering, shaming for being different is exactly what the Republicans do - call it what it is. Not “weird.”

Most normal Americans don't want weird politicians. We want boring, capable, and ethical politicians who do not have their nose buried in their bizarro Twitter feed for 8+ hours per day (literally a lot of Congress critters are reading Twitter that much per day and are OBSESSED with their engagement metrics).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, does the DNC really think something like this is going to resonate with normal people?

[twitter] https://x.com/joshraby/status/1815889888207892619?s=46&t=pauDPTlVqSRnQcIdMZswBw[/twitter]

Maybe democrats just need to talk about Kamala's record.

Ohhh... wait...

Right. They don’t want to elevate the debate to politics and the issues because they know they’ll lose. Americans aren’t going to fall for a candidate being “weird” from the candidate marketing herself as the “ brat”. It makes Kamala sound like she is in 7th grade and that’s what her maturity seems like so it fits.

They want to keep enjoying the fake news that they’re weird and bang couches. Meanwhile, their party allows you to be gender free or have no sexuality or have all of them all at once. That’s not weird though. Being non binary , vegan, pro Palestine, trans, BLM/defund the cops all at once is so not weird.

From what I can gather, it appears Jd Vance was a progressive /Democrat and like many millennials became conservative after the progressives went too far left regarding gender and kids. Lots of progressives left the Democrat party in the past 10 years and lots of millennials and white males too but the Dems haven’t realized they’re bleeding out members yet which is why their Vp shortlists are a struggle to get anyone young. Or maybe they have realized it and that’s why they want automatic citizenship for illegal aliens.

My DD is asexual. I’m Gen X and I will admit don’t completely understand it and have been talking to her and learning. I do believe being asexual isn’t new. It’s just the women who were ACE in my generation often married, had a “low sex drive”, we’re “frigid” or just put up with sex as part of the marriage and kids deal. And I think knowing sexual relationships aren’t for you and making life choices accordingly isnt widely understood, but isn’t wierd, ick. And it’s better than “putting up with” sex. She is meh on kids, but 20, so that’s to be expected. But is open to starting a family with artificial insemination or something like that down the line. Is possibly interested in a non sexual marriage or coparenting relationship.

Now, I realize wierdo JD Vance would want to force her into marriage and kids and not have her be a childless cat lady/ in a sexless relationship (because JD Vance cares if my DD is sexually active? Because you do? That’s weird). The only difference between her and my generation is that she’d be up front about the no sex part and not “put up with it for a few years to have kids,” then have a marriage go off the tracks because different parties want different things/ sexual incompatibility . She’d be her authentic self, which I fully support.

Interesting and sadly, she does not consider herself to be part of the LGBTQ community. She says within a community where everyone primarily identifies by their sexuality, having no sexuality is marginalized. That makes her angry— that the “big tent” of people who don’t identify as heterosexual and have been marginalized for it will now marginalize a group because it identifies as no sexuality. So she doesn’t own a pride flag or rainbow anything. She has found her way to a group of other asexual kids on campus. And that helps.

But it doesn’t make her weird/Ick. She attends a top VA college (UVA/ WM/VT STEM), works hard, hangs out with friends, plays her instrument in the orchestra, is studying abroad, is very clean cut, favors a neat pony tail for long hair, jeans or Lulumon pants, a T-shirt and a hoodie, uses she/her, avoids the issue of Gaza on campus because, “I don’t like to both sides thing. But, her both sides are behaving terribly on campus”. She has moderately liberal political opinions and votes, but avoid campus politics.

And here’s the thing. Outside some friends on campus and her sibling and DH and I, she isn’t out about being asexual, even to grandparents, because “no one understands it”. If you met her, you’d think— normal UMC white girl. And have no idea.

So why is she weird/ Ick? And do you think it’s better for her to force herself to have sexual relationships she doesn’t want to form a family where she and the father will end up deeply unhappy and possibly divorced?

Since you are dunking on asexuals, I really want an answer here from PP or other a Republican weirdos who care whether people have sex, with whom, when, and in what positions. I think she’s doing her, not advertising or announcing her sexuality, or making it an issue, because she views her sexuality as private. But she is making life decision based on her authentic self. And I’m glad she is.

What’s your issue with it.

I have no issue with asexuals but I find it strange Dems use incel as a slur when they claim to be the sexually enlightened and accepting ones. I find it strange Dems don’t understand the social contract requires having children (at least 1) so the Dems are already at a disadvantage for the political future and you see the herds thinning already when the only millenial prospects are AOC and a small handful of others who also ironically don’t want kids. The Republicans are playing the long game by making sure they reproduce. The white and black communities in America are growing in childless rates with Gen Z and millennials and it’s not the Young Republican movement struggling with having kids. It’s all Democrats’ kids. The God, country, family thing wasn’t engrained into them which is fine but I think it puts progressives at a severe disadvantage for the future.
I suspect this is why Dems want illegal immigration and to make them citizens

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, does the DNC really think something like this is going to resonate with normal people?

[twitter] https://x.com/joshraby/status/1815889888207892619?s=46&t=pauDPTlVqSRnQcIdMZswBw[/twitter]

Absolutely! You can't look at JD especially, and think 'There goes a totally normal guy!'. And we ALLLLLL know that Trump is weird. It's a really simple message that people will mostly agree with.

So that kind of weird doesn’t sit well with you, but you’re okay with a man, that has a penis, competing in women’s sports? Hypocrite.

You know what kind of weird doesn't sit well with me?

People who can't stop thinking about genitals when they watch or talk about sports.

People like you need therapy. A LOT of therapy. Someone must have done a number on you when you were a kid to be this obsessed with sex organs at a sporting event.

That is such a flat, stupid argument. Tell that to the girls that have to tolerate a grown man in their locker room. What a lame response to gaslight me so you don’t have to focus on the actual facts. Hypocrite.

Tell it to the girls who had Trump in their locker room? https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/

Wow, I thought I knew all the Trump stories, but that's a new one for me. And probably the creepiest one yet. Eck, I don't know how anybody can live with themselves voting for this guy.

Here's another link without a subscription wall:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-former-miss-arizona-tasha-dixon-naked-undressed-backstage-howard-stern-a7357866.html

Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant also said the Republican used to walk in. Some of the girls were as young as 15.

Former Miss Vermont Teen USA, Mariah Billado, told Buzzfeed: "I remember putting on my dress really quick because I was like, 'Oh my god, there's a man in here."

Three other girls chose to remain anonymous, but told the publication it was "creepy" and "shocking".

Mr Trump said on the Howard Stern radio show in 2005 that he was “allowed”, as the owner of the pageant, to go backstage while the contestants were getting dressed.

And all the Rs who are whipping up hysteria about trans kids are just fine with Trump being a total perv.

Isn't it funny how they're always the ones doing the things they accuse others of doing? With the GOP every accusation is a confession.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, does the DNC really think something like this is going to resonate with normal people?

[twitter] https://x.com/joshraby/status/1815889888207892619?s=46&t=pauDPTlVqSRnQcIdMZswBw[/twitter]

Absolutely! You can't look at JD especially, and think 'There goes a totally normal guy!'. And we ALLLLLL know that Trump is weird. It's a really simple message that people will mostly agree with.

So that kind of weird doesn’t sit well with you, but you’re okay with a man, that has a penis, competing in women’s sports? Hypocrite.

You know what kind of weird doesn't sit well with me?

People who can't stop thinking about genitals when they watch or talk about sports.

People like you need therapy. A LOT of therapy. Someone must have done a number on you when you were a kid to be this obsessed with sex organs at a sporting event.

That is such a flat, stupid argument. Tell that to the girls that have to tolerate a grown man in their locker room. What a lame response to gaslight me so you don’t have to focus on the actual facts. Hypocrite.

Tell it to the girls who had Trump in their locker room? https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/

Wow, I thought I knew all the Trump stories, but that's a new one for me. And probably the creepiest one yet. Eck, I don't know how anybody can live with themselves voting for this guy.

Here's another link without a subscription wall:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-former-miss-arizona-tasha-dixon-naked-undressed-backstage-howard-stern-a7357866.html

Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant also said the Republican used to walk in. Some of the girls were as young as 15.

Former Miss Vermont Teen USA, Mariah Billado, told Buzzfeed: "I remember putting on my dress really quick because I was like, 'Oh my god, there's a man in here."

Three other girls chose to remain anonymous, but told the publication it was "creepy" and "shocking".

Mr Trump said on the Howard Stern radio show in 2005 that he was “allowed”, as the owner of the pageant, to go backstage while the contestants were getting dressed.

And all the Rs who are whipping up hysteria about trans kids are just fine with Trump being a total perv.