Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Stop hiding his medical problems on an on-going basis. They could have advised him to pull out before the primaries, allowing voters to select his replacement. They didn't need to humiliate him (and the US) in a national debate post-primaries and pre-convention.

Intellectual dishonesty, Biden wasn’t going to stop hiding his medical problems or drop out. He would have fired them all immediately if they suggested those things.

He wants to be president again, and presidential candidates have to debate. He wasn’t asking for advice on how to bow out gracefully and you know it.

If they were concerned over the implications to the US of Biden's physical incapacity, they could have resigned on principle pre-primaries. Instead, they went along with the ruse through the primaries which shut out other contenders, including Harris, and only when primaries concluded, they publicly humiliated Biden to open the door to the preferred nominee.

And Biden’s new advisors would have to have resigned as they could not have advised him to reveal his medical condition and terminate his candidacy as they would have been fired immediately. He could have had team after team of advisors, and none of them could have said Joe tell everyone you are sick and resign.

No advisors could have told him the truth and kept their job. He still won’t tell Americans what his medical diagnosis is and what medication he’s taking and what his prognosis is, Joe is still hiding everything.

Anonymous wrote:

The Biden family is trashy

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Stop hiding his medical problems on an on-going basis. They could have advised him to pull out before the primaries, allowing voters to select his replacement. They didn't need to humiliate him (and the US) in a national debate post-primaries and pre-convention.

Intellectual dishonesty, Biden wasn’t going to stop hiding his medical problems or drop out. He would have fired them all immediately if they suggested those things.

He wants to be president again, and presidential candidates have to debate. He wasn’t asking for advice on how to bow out gracefully and you know it.

If they were concerned over the implications to the US of Biden's physical incapacity, they could have resigned on principle pre-primaries. Instead, they went along with the ruse through the primaries which shut out other contenders, including Harris, and only when primaries concluded, they publicly humiliated Biden to open the door to the preferred nominee.

Which in some states means he will still be on the ballot anyway.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Stop hiding his medical problems on an on-going basis. They could have advised him to pull out before the primaries, allowing voters to select his replacement. They didn't need to humiliate him (and the US) in a national debate post-primaries and pre-convention.

Intellectual dishonesty, Biden wasn’t going to stop hiding his medical problems or drop out. He would have fired them all immediately if they suggested those things.

He wants to be president again, and presidential candidates have to debate. He wasn’t asking for advice on how to bow out gracefully and you know it.

If they were concerned over the implications to the US of Biden's physical incapacity, they could have resigned on principle pre-primaries. Instead, they went along with the ruse through the primaries which shut out other contenders, including Harris, and only when primaries concluded, they publicly humiliated Biden to open the door to the preferred nominee.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

I can’t believe the idiotic short sighted actions of supposed party leaders enabled this and now trump will win because of it! How could they possibly think this would work? I hope they all get fired. I don’t buy the deep state or ‘msm’ nonsense so how on earth did they think they could pull this off?

"I hope they all get fired". The American public has to fire them and that firing needs to start with the dissolution of the RNC and DNC. Absolutely disgusting what they've done for America in exchange for trillions of "donated" dollars.

I don’t like the DNC or RNC, but at least the RNC allows republicans to vote for their presidential candidate. The RNC never wanted Trump, but republican voters did.

Are democrats happy that their national committee is hiding all this stuff from them, and what else have they been lying about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

I can’t believe the idiotic short sighted actions of supposed party leaders enabled this and now trump will win because of it! How could they possibly think this would work? I hope they all get fired. I don’t buy the deep state or ‘msm’ nonsense so how on earth did they think they could pull this off?

"I hope they all get fired". The American public has to fire them and that firing needs to start with the dissolution of the RNC and DNC. Absolutely disgusting what they've done for America in exchange for trillions of "donated" dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

I can’t believe the idiotic short sighted actions of supposed party leaders enabled this and now trump will win because of it! How could they possibly think this would work? I hope they all get fired. I don’t buy the deep state or ‘msm’ nonsense so how on earth did they think they could pull this off?

They won’t get fired; they are running the democrat party. They are trying to figure out ways to cover their butts and maintain their power as we type.

These high ranking democrat power brokers are stupid af. You are correct; how did they ever think this would work? Only a very dumb person or group of people would think this was a viable plan. They also have to be supremely arrogant for even considering a ridiculous plan like this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Stop hiding his medical problems on an on-going basis. They could have advised him to pull out before the primaries, allowing voters to select his replacement. They didn't need to humiliate him (and the US) in a national debate post-primaries and pre-convention.

Intellectual dishonesty, Biden wasn’t going to stop hiding his medical problems or drop out. He would have fired them all immediately if they suggested those things.

He wants to be president again, and presidential candidates have to debate. He wasn’t asking for advice on how to bow out gracefully and you know it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

I can’t believe the idiotic short sighted actions of supposed party leaders enabled this and now trump will win because of it! How could they possibly think this would work? I hope they all get fired. I don’t buy the deep state or ‘msm’ nonsense so how on earth did they think they could pull this off?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Stop hiding his medical problems on an on-going basis. They could have advised him to pull out before the primaries, allowing voters to select his replacement. They didn't need to humiliate him (and the US) in a national debate post-primaries and pre-convention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

And the point would be that he would be able to hide his medical problems until after he was nominated officially? That helps him maintain the lie but doesn’t help our country and the American people. Is the point to maintain power or to be an effective and capable leader?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Debate post-convention, as usually occurs.

Anonymous wrote:

does that guy know who is running America right now? Their names? No. America is destroyed. What a farce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.

He had to debate, what would you have advised him to do?

Anonymous wrote:Just disgraceful that they're blaming his advisors for HIS OWN poor performance?? Good grief. They're ALL to blame - including his family - for allowing him to run.

His advisors had him enter one of the earliest presidential debates ever, pre-convention, even though they knew his physical limitations. He was set up to fail.