Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll missing the forest. The purpose of ECNL is for college recruiting. It helps colleges find players and players find colleges. That’s why there are 44 teams in a “playoff”. Think of it like a job fair. If a player comes back from Seattle with several coach emails and invites (job leads and interviews), it’s a success. If the team wins but no coach interest it’s a failure. To the extent that winning is a goal it is only because it might enhance the true goal and give more chances for college interest. Those of you arguing over playing styles and tactics and national championships are so naive.
Some of us care about quality futbol. The pencil-neck poindexters view soccer as nothing more than a vehicle for their upper class white girl DD to get even more privilege (ie better college admission), which is the actual reason the quality around here sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
44 teams qualify for ecnl champions league. Many many more teams qualify for ecnl playoffs. How dumb are you?
Dumb enough to realize it's a sham
64 or 44 teams in national playoff finals
There's obviously a lack of quality to make up numbers for $$ sake
What club does your DC play for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
44 teams qualify for ecnl champions league. Many many more teams qualify for ecnl playoffs. How dumb are you?
Dumb enough to realize it's a sham
64 or 44 teams in national playoff finals
There's obviously a lack of quality to make up numbers for $$ sake
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
44 teams qualify for ecnl champions league. Many many more teams qualify for ecnl playoffs. How dumb are you?
Anonymous wrote:I'll tell you what, give me a 100 players to pick from to form my team, then you get 50 players to pick from to form your team.
When the two teams play each other and my team wins, see if you can come up with a playing style or development method that's going to help your player pool with half the size beat my team that I picked out of 100 players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll missing the forest. The purpose of ECNL is for college recruiting. It helps colleges find players and players find colleges. That’s why there are 44 teams in a “playoff”. Think of it like a job fair. If a player comes back from Seattle with several coach emails and invites (job leads and interviews), it’s a success. If the team wins but no coach interest it’s a failure. To the extent that winning is a goal it is only because it might enhance the true goal and give more chances for college interest. Those of you arguing over playing styles and tactics and national championships are so naive.
Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll missing the forest. The purpose of ECNL is for college recruiting. It helps colleges find players and players find colleges. That’s why there are 44 teams in a “playoff”. Think of it like a job fair. If a player comes back from Seattle with several coach emails and invites (job leads and interviews), it’s a success. If the team wins but no coach interest it’s a failure. To the extent that winning is a goal it is only because it might enhance the true goal and give more chances for college interest. Those of you arguing over playing styles and tactics and national championships are so naive.
Anonymous wrote:I'll tell you what, give me a 100 players to pick from to form my team, then you get 50 players to pick from to form your team.
When the two teams play each other and my team wins, see if you can come up with a playing style or development method that's going to help your player pool with half the size beat my team that I picked out of 100 players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
Please tell us about a league that isn’t pay to play with the same level of competition in the US. Otherwise, STFU.
What level of competition are you talking about?
Multiple teams going 0:3 or 0:2:1 after flying across country at high costs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 44 teams at 'Nationals' and many are getting blown out and not winning a single game
This means the overall quality is low.
Why are there 44 teams?
There are 44 teams at champions league.
I'll assume you're not dumb enough to be drawing comparison between watered down pay-to-play ecnl with parents spending thousands to attend pseudo 'nationals' with the UEFA Champions League
Please tell us about a league that isn’t pay to play with the same level of competition in the US. Otherwise, STFU.