Anonymous wrote:LIL republicans are only going to allow head to toe coverage for women

Get ready because this thread is nothing compared to where we are headed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a fashion trend for 20-somethings I'm not aware of? Is this taking athleisure to the very extreme? Do these women have jobs? I'm trying to imagine where you'd be coming to and from dressed like that, then just decide to pop into Whole Foods. I have seen it both in the city and in a boring suburban Whole Foods - a long ways from LA or Miami! They are dressed like a Kardashian doing a raunchy photo shoot - but they're out in public at a freakin' grocery store walking around with boobs barely covered!

From another thread:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the same at Whole Foods. Why are some shoppers in a bra and hot pants? It’s not a gym. People don’t wear clothes anymore.

I saw this yesterday at WF and wondered w-t-f was wrong with the 20-something gal. Boobs were popping out. So tacky.

Maybe it's partly due to celebrities wearing see through clothes to events.

Who are you to judge what to wear?

If my body looked good and if I were in my 20s I would dress skimpy or body revealing. See thru, no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a fashion trend for 20-somethings I'm not aware of? Is this taking athleisure to the very extreme? Do these women have jobs? I'm trying to imagine where you'd be coming to and from dressed like that, then just decide to pop into Whole Foods. I have seen it both in the city and in a boring suburban Whole Foods - a long ways from LA or Miami! They are dressed like a Kardashian doing a raunchy photo shoot - but they're out in public at a freakin' grocery store walking around with boobs barely covered!

From another thread:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the same at Whole Foods. Why are some shoppers in a bra and hot pants? It’s not a gym. People don’t wear clothes anymore.

I saw this yesterday at WF and wondered w-t-f was wrong with the 20-something gal. Boobs were popping out. So tacky.

Maybe it's partly due to celebrities wearing see through clothes to events.

Who are you to judge what to wear?

Anonymous wrote:Wore my sports bra, a midi skirt, and an open buttonup to Whole Foods today after my gym session. No one cared.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't mind yoga pants and sports bra, but, those scrunch butt leggings have got to go.

I call them butthole pants.

I didn't know these existed until this thread!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not at all uncommon in the 80s and even 90s - grocery shopping, out and about, etc

Nope. Not out and about. In exercise studios, gyms, at home, but not what you'd wear running errands. Then you'd wear a cover to go to and from the place you were working out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don't understand is why people keep fooling themselves that these are the best clothes to exercise in. It's weird AF.

I wear a sports bra and leggings to exercise in (and sometimes go to Whole Foods on my way home). What exactly do you propose we wear?

So you go the grocery store in your bra? How bizarre.

Yeah, I do. I also walk around to other places, like CVS and TJMaxx and the post office in my sports bra! It’s great! You should try it sometime.

It doesn’t surprise me you shop at CVS and TJMaxx.

Anonymous wrote:This was not at all uncommon in the 80s and even 90s - grocery shopping, out and about, etc

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't mind yoga pants and sports bra, but, those scrunch butt leggings have got to go.

I call them butthole pants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let women wear what they want. I agree that it’s a slippery slope when we start policing women’s bodies.

BUT. What smart women know is that what they wear and how they carry themselves is a signal of their class, and people pick up on this either consciously or subconsciously.

I was always told to dress for the life and job I want. I know that going out in public in ruched butt leggings will turn a lot of heads. But not the right kind of heads. I knew I wanted an upper class life style, husband, career, and on the whole, this requires a certain look. It’s not about how much money you spend on clothing. I could go to Walmart and put together a classy outfit. Women need to be more perceptive about this. You can’t dress like a tramp and then wonder to all your followers on social media why you can’t find a man to respect you these days. Look the part, act the part, win the prize.

And BTW, I’m a Democrat and atheist, FWIW.

Exactly. It's a trashy look to wear underwear in public. However, no one is saying we should be policing women's bodies -- we have a right to judge each other. That's part of being human.

What is it that makes "classy" women think it's okay to label other women as trashy or tramps? You may have such amazing liberal creds, but you're still just a misogynist.

Give me a break. Unless you are blind, you make judgements based on what people look like -- just like the rest of us do.

Give me a break. There's a big difference in judging something inappropriate and labeling it "trashy" or worse..."trampy." We can dislike a look without using sexist terms. And also, see the fat shaming nasty above...she points out to her daughter the was in other people's bodies?!

No wonder so many of you are so needlessly hateful.

Look, if you insist on going out in public in your underwear, you should know what people around you are thinking.

Maybe you should put down the cheetos, get off the internet, and go join a gymnor somwthing. Then you too can join the hot girls wearing workout clothes to Whole Foods Club.

Anonymous wrote:I don't mind yoga pants and sports bra, but, those scrunch butt leggings have got to go.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let women wear what they want. I agree that it’s a slippery slope when we start policing women’s bodies.

BUT. What smart women know is that what they wear and how they carry themselves is a signal of their class, and people pick up on this either consciously or subconsciously.

I was always told to dress for the life and job I want. I know that going out in public in ruched butt leggings will turn a lot of heads. But not the right kind of heads. I knew I wanted an upper class life style, husband, career, and on the whole, this requires a certain look. It’s not about how much money you spend on clothing. I could go to Walmart and put together a classy outfit. Women need to be more perceptive about this. You can’t dress like a tramp and then wonder to all your followers on social media why you can’t find a man to respect you these days. Look the part, act the part, win the prize.

And BTW, I’m a Democrat and atheist, FWIW.

Exactly. It's a trashy look to wear underwear in public. However, no one is saying we should be policing women's bodies -- we have a right to judge each other. That's part of being human.

What is it that makes "classy" women think it's okay to label other women as trashy or tramps? You may have such amazing liberal creds, but you're still just a misogynist.

Give me a break. Unless you are blind, you make judgements based on what people look like -- just like the rest of us do.

Give me a break. There's a big difference in judging something inappropriate and labeling it "trashy" or worse..."trampy." We can dislike a look without using sexist terms. And also, see the fat shaming nasty above...she points out to her daughter the was in other people's bodies?!

No wonder so many of you are so needlessly hateful.