Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our youngest is at Princeton. It feels like there are far more rules and the administration is far less understanding and flexible compared to our oldest child's experience at another Ivy. For instance, Princeton students are forbidden from getting outside tutoring if they are having difficulty in a class (it is considered an honor code violation). The students are supposed to use the student tutors provided by the school, but there aren't nearly enough to go around. So a student having difficulties in a class who is unable to secure one of the few tutors is left to completely flounder or risk getting an honor code violation by seeking outside help. That doesn't make sense to me.
This is our experience. It is not a loose and easy place. It's very regimented.
There are extensive resources available through the university to provide academic support, so they don’t permit students to pay outside tutors to do their work for them. It’s a perfectly sensible policy, and those who chafe at it should be taking other courses or enrolled elsewhere.
The policy makes no sense. Tutors can help but they are not taking midterm or final exams for the kids. Some kids need extra support
Anonymous wrote:Pressure cooker schools aren’t the issue.
Anxiety fueled by parents (whether intentionally or unwittingly) shapes your kid’s health, behavior, everything.
Anonymous wrote:Isolation is a key factor . Princeton seems cold, clinical, and drab in terms of campus life or having a college town feel. UPenn, Columbia, Yale, Cornell seem to have more energy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our youngest is at Princeton. It feels like there are far more rules and the administration is far less understanding and flexible compared to our oldest child's experience at another Ivy. For instance, Princeton students are forbidden from getting outside tutoring if they are having difficulty in a class (it is considered an honor code violation). The students are supposed to use the student tutors provided by the school, but there aren't nearly enough to go around. So a student having difficulties in a class who is unable to secure one of the few tutors is left to completely flounder or risk getting an honor code violation by seeking outside help. That doesn't make sense to me.
This is our experience. It is not a loose and easy place. It's very regimented.
There are extensive resources available through the university to provide academic support, so they don’t permit students to pay outside tutors to do their work for them. It’s a perfectly sensible policy, and those who chafe at it should be taking other courses or enrolled elsewhere.
. It’s a perfectly sensible policy, and those who chafe at it should be taking other courses or enrolled elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our youngest is at Princeton. It feels like there are far more rules and the administration is far less understanding and flexible compared to our oldest child's experience at another Ivy. For instance, Princeton students are forbidden from getting outside tutoring if they are having difficulty in a class (it is considered an honor code violation). The students are supposed to use the student tutors provided by the school, but there aren't nearly enough to go around. So a student having difficulties in a class who is unable to secure one of the few tutors is left to completely flounder or risk getting an honor code violation by seeking outside help. That doesn't make sense to me.
This is our experience. It is not a loose and easy place. It's very regimented.
Anonymous wrote:Our youngest is at Princeton. It feels like there are far more rules and the administration is far less understanding and flexible compared to our oldest child's experience at another Ivy. For instance, Princeton students are forbidden from getting outside tutoring if they are having difficulty in a class (it is considered an honor code violation). The students are supposed to use the student tutors provided by the school, but there aren't nearly enough to go around. So a student having difficulties in a class who is unable to secure one of the few tutors is left to completely flounder or risk getting an honor code violation by seeking outside help. That doesn't make sense to me.
Anonymous wrote:Allegedly the final batch of decision are coming out today at 5pm. This school is a high reach for my child so we are not expecting an acceptance. So I just want to be armed with a few reasons that Carnegie Mellon is not a good school (we will be on an incredibly long road trip when the decision comes out). The only things that I can think of is that it is extremely expensive, located in Pittsburg and is known for being highly cutthroat (rather than collaborative). Other than that, I have nothing.
Anonymous wrote:I know something about Princeton's insane pressure-cooker attitude.
Princeton cares most about one thing: its #1 position at the top of the rankings. Anything a student does to possibly damage that reputation is dealt with severely by the administration.
Also the "we're #1 in the world" (not just the US, BTW) attitude is pervasive. It breeds incredible workaholic behavior that's very single-minded, the total opposite of what a broad liberal arts education is supposed to produce.
My heart goes out to the families of these students. No amount of "prestige" is worth losing your life over.