Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One interesting thing about GDS is that they limit students to 10 applications, only 3 of which may be “reaches.” And they define any school with an acceptance rate of 20% (or 25%?) or less to be a reach. That means GDS students are effectively unable to shotgun all the top 10 schools, or all Ivy League, or whatever.
(They are allowing students this year to apply to 2 more schools beyond the usual 10, but the additional ones must be “foundational” — or safety — schools. This is a response to the uncertainty created by the Supreme Court.)
I don’t know if other private schools have similar policies. But I do think that in the absence of these policies, you would probably find more “shotgunning” and thus more admissions to highly selective schools. They are quite serious about the policy — my kid got into a couple safeties in early action, but the school would not permit him to add another reach school for regular admission. He could only add “foundational” schools even with admissions in hand.
How can they restrict the number of schools a kid applies to?? That seems ridiculous
Restricted and semi controlled who applies where = greater chance of success. If the top 5 candidates apply to every T10 and get in then less room for other candidates. Your first competition is within your school, so by restricting applicants it helps all candidates and also makes the school have better yield.
This answers the question WHY they do it, but not HOW. how on earth do they control this? I would be livid if the school my kid attends tried to control or prevent their applying anywhere they wanted. They can’t withhold transcripts, can they? Do they refuse LOR once you’ve hit a certain number? I’m realty confused how it works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Unlike TJ, these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive, so it's not all that surprising or shameful.
Is TJ admissions still based on merit? I thought they changed that a few years back.
At least it hasn’t been completely shuttered yet like the Chicago mayor is planning for his best performing public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One interesting thing about GDS is that they limit students to 10 applications, only 3 of which may be “reaches.” And they define any school with an acceptance rate of 20% (or 25%?) or less to be a reach. That means GDS students are effectively unable to shotgun all the top 10 schools, or all Ivy League, or whatever.
(They are allowing students this year to apply to 2 more schools beyond the usual 10, but the additional ones must be “foundational” — or safety — schools. This is a response to the uncertainty created by the Supreme Court.)
I don’t know if other private schools have similar policies. But I do think that in the absence of these policies, you would probably find more “shotgunning” and thus more admissions to highly selective schools. They are quite serious about the policy — my kid got into a couple safeties in early action, but the school would not permit him to add another reach school for regular admission. He could only add “foundational” schools even with admissions in hand.
How can they restrict the number of schools a kid applies to?? That seems ridiculous
Restricted and semi controlled who applies where = greater chance of success. If the top 5 candidates apply to every T10 and get in then less room for other candidates. Your first competition is within your school, so by restricting applicants it helps all candidates and also makes the school have better yield.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Unlike TJ, these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive, so it's not all that surprising or shameful.
Is TJ admissions still based on merit? I thought they changed that a few years back.
At least it hasn’t been completely shuttered yet like the Chicago mayor is planning for his best performing public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you think that Q is on the preK/K application?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9th grade has a lot of siblings and faculty kids - some of whom are also awesome students.
I knew they limited to 12 but really only 3 with less than 25% admission rates? What’s the point of that?
Would love to see a list of how many GDS students are accepted to college because of legacy. (If the parent went to a top 10 college does GDS look upon that favorably in the child’s application process?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive
What is 9th grade admissions based on at these schools, if not merit?
For most kids, 9th grade admissions is based on having attended the same school for 8th.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/gdsseniors2024?igshid=OGQ5ZDc2ODk2ZA==
Anonymous wrote:9th grade has a lot of siblings and faculty kids - some of whom are also awesome students.
I knew they limited to 12 but really only 3 with less than 25% admission rates? What’s the point of that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.
Unlike TJ, these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive, so it's not all that surprising or shameful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive
What is 9th grade admissions based on at these schools, if not merit?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One interesting thing about GDS is that they limit students to 10 applications, only 3 of which may be “reaches.” And they define any school with an acceptance rate of 20% (or 25%?) or less to be a reach. That means GDS students are effectively unable to shotgun all the top 10 schools, or all Ivy League, or whatever.
(They are allowing students this year to apply to 2 more schools beyond the usual 10, but the additional ones must be “foundational” — or safety — schools. This is a response to the uncertainty created by the Supreme Court.)
I don’t know if other private schools have similar policies. But I do think that in the absence of these policies, you would probably find more “shotgunning” and thus more admissions to highly selective schools. They are quite serious about the policy — my kid got into a couple safeties in early action, but the school would not permit him to add another reach school for regular admission. He could only add “foundational” schools even with admissions in hand.
How can they restrict the number of schools a kid applies to?? That seems ridiculous
Restricted and semi controlled who applies where = greater chance of success. If the top 5 candidates apply to every T10 and get in then less room for other candidates. Your first competition is within your school, so by restricting applicants it helps all candidates and also makes the school have better yield.
Anonymous wrote:these schools mostly cater to the wealthy, and entry isn't based on merit or drive
Anonymous wrote:Worse outcome than a public high school in fairfax county. Shameful.