Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many millennial men are willing & able to (a) be the sole provider so their wives can SAHM, or (b) take on 50% of house and kid responsibilities so their wives can also have a career? I guess option (c) is the men can SAHD but very few women are actually interested in that setup. There is your answer.
I’m not sure if they are 50/50 but they do much more.
I’d say few are interested in (a) or (c)
Many are interested in (a) they're just afraid to say it out loud and be deemed unfeminist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our system isn't set up for disabled, childless, family less adults. It'll be interesting to see how that all plays out.
and our current system is also not set up to support pregnant women, postpartum women, and children under the age of 5. Societally and culturally, children are treated horribly in the US and have effectively, no rights.
Our society isn't really set up to help anyone at all, is it? SS and Medicare aren't "help", we pay for them. Disability income in this society is a joke.
We are a survival of the fittest society. We don't really care about individual suffering. Individual suffering is part of America's soul.
Anonymous wrote:I know one (c) family. The wife is a partner at a law firm and the husband does some part-time photography but is basically a SAHD. However, they only have one kid, in middle school, and they both worked FT when he was younger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a doc who sees people at end of life. If you don’t have kids then it’s really important to focus on building a community of people younger or investing in nieces / nephews. The us is not set up for the elderly without support systems. It’s hard not to have an advocate when you are sick and elderly.
I’d say have daughters too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our system isn't set up for disabled, childless, family less adults. It'll be interesting to see how that all plays out.
and our current system is also not set up to support pregnant women, postpartum women, and children under the age of 5. Societally and culturally, children are treated horribly in the US and have effectively, no rights.
Anonymous wrote:How many millennial men are willing & able to (a) be the sole provider so their wives can SAHM, or (b) take on 50% of house and kid responsibilities so their wives can also have a career? I guess option (c) is the men can SAHD but very few women are actually interested in that setup. There is your answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many millennial men are willing & able to (a) be the sole provider so their wives can SAHM, or (b) take on 50% of house and kid responsibilities so their wives can also have a career? I guess option (c) is the men can SAHD but very few women are actually interested in that setup. There is your answer.
I’m not sure if they are 50/50 but they do much more.
I’d say few are interested in (a) or (c)
Many are interested in (a) they're just afraid to say it out loud and be deemed unfeminist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many millennial men are willing & able to (a) be the sole provider so their wives can SAHM, or (b) take on 50% of house and kid responsibilities so their wives can also have a career? I guess option (c) is the men can SAHD but very few women are actually interested in that setup. There is your answer.
I’m not sure if they are 50/50 but they do much more.
I’d say few are interested in (a) or (c)
Anonymous wrote:I’m a doc who sees people at end of life. If you don’t have kids then it’s really important to focus on building a community of people younger or investing in nieces / nephews. The us is not set up for the elderly without support systems. It’s hard not to have an advocate when you are sick and elderly.
Anonymous wrote:How many millennial men are willing & able to (a) be the sole provider so their wives can SAHM, or (b) take on 50% of house and kid responsibilities so their wives can also have a career? I guess option (c) is the men can SAHD but very few women are actually interested in that setup. There is your answer.
Anonymous wrote:The world and US could use less people. The (big) problem is the educated people with means are the ones deciding not to have kids or have fewer. While the poor and uneducated are multiplying by a lot