Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I can’t believe that someone who explicitly told guests “you may only arrive after you’ve eaten lunch and you must bring snacks as we will not be sharing any food with you beyond what we cook for dinner” has a strong grasp on normal human behavior.
Where did I say that explicitly told them to come after lunch? I didn’t say that, you made that up, along with other idiotic things.
I told them to bring everything for a day at the beach including snacks to carry kids over until dinner. They arrived after lunch. I assume people feed their kids lunch, but apparently I was wrong. They didn’t bring any snacks. The kids ate ALL the snacks both families brought for that weekend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
You don't think kids (who are calorie furnaces by virtue of growing in the first place) would benefit from a snack after 2 hours of physical activity? wtf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I can’t believe that someone who explicitly told guests “you may only arrive after you’ve eaten lunch and you must bring snacks as we will not be sharing any food with you beyond what we cook for dinner” has a strong grasp on normal human behavior.
Where did I say that explicitly told them to come after lunch? I didn’t say that, you made that up, along with other idiotic things.
I told them to bring everything for a day at the beach including snacks to carry kids over until dinner. They arrived after lunch. I assume people feed their kids lunch, but apparently I was wrong. They didn’t bring any snacks. The kids ate ALL the snacks both families brought for that weekend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
This is probably the “issues with food” rearing its head that people suggested you probably had.
They’re probably fat if they think sharing snacks because that means they eat every 2 hours is a logical progression that only a pathological person with an unhealthy relationship with food would follow.
Anonymous wrote:
I can’t believe that someone who explicitly told guests “you may only arrive after you’ve eaten lunch and you must bring snacks as we will not be sharing any food with you beyond what we cook for dinner” has a strong grasp on normal human behavior.
Anonymous wrote:But crying and screaming because a CHILD laid down in your rental bed because she was tired is just immature. Grow. Up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
You don't think kids (who are calorie furnaces by virtue of growing in the first place) would benefit from a snack after 2 hours of physical activity? wtf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
As a new parent the emphasis on snacks for everything shocked me. When my kids started soccer at age 3 I could not understand why we had to provide juice and snacks after matches - not practice, but matches which seemed to be shorter. It was such an important thing to parents, they would get pissed if the snacks weren't "good" enough. The fields were filled with trash from the kids snacks. If you walk around the fields at any public school you'll see it. The whole match start to finish was less than 2 hours. No kid was dying or so depleted to need this. It is insane.
I felt the same about gd goody bags filled with plastic crap for every event in school. Why do parents not question this idiocy and refuse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weve entered the phase of this thread where the OP is sock puppeting like crazy to make it appear she has allies
I’ve posted in support of OP and I’m not her. Ask Jeff (or, you know, get a life).
The slavering pack of hyenas piling on to defend the ill-mannered, spoiled kid “guests” and their parents are very telling, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get why you invited a family over for dinner, specifically told them to come after lunch so you don't have to feed them, specifically told them to bring snacks so you don't have to feed them snacks....that's a weird flex.
They were rude to not ask, yes, but you are not a gracious host. At all. If guests are coming after lunch you could easily have put out a spread of snacks and drinks.
THIS
Exactly. It’s this fundamental part of the story that makes me doubt the veracity of OPs claims regarding the other family’s behavior. I can’t believe that someone who explicitly told guests “you may only arrive after you’ve eaten lunch and you must bring snacks as we will not be sharing any food with you beyond what we cook for dinner” has a strong grasp on normal human behavior.
Also, I am suspicious that, while OP was clearly dedicated to the no food sharing policy, the other family renting may not have been as rigid. If all hosts were, why did no one speak up? Were all the other hosts and their kids firmly on board with the no snack sharing? It’s just hard for me to me imagine a house full of adults and kids vehemently against sharing any food with the guests they invited over. And if they all were why did no one say anything?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, we all know DCUM is in full support of the weird (mostly) Gen Y/Z obsession with their kids needing to cram something in their mouths every 60-90 minutes between meals, lest they wither and die on the vine.![]()
Their kids probably weigh 200 lb from all the sandwiches and muffins these women shove in them every two hours.