Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
If we do the same work - shouldn't we get the same pay? Not sure I understand this argument.
Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
You get paid for your value add relative to other available workers, not your poor life choices.
Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
Anonymous wrote:I am hiring for a very flexible hybrid job. 2-3 days a week at home, casual dress, flex hours, meaning at work or at home pretty much start at 6am if you want, at 12 noon if you want. Work 4 hours one day and catch up later.
But do to scammers first 90 days are in office 5 days a week. Just had women drop out today of interview process as she lied and actually lives in North Carolina using Moms DC address.
Remote and WFH attracts scammers
Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.
Anonymous wrote:I work in an elementary school. We we were teaching online (Sept. through March 2020-2021) I went into my building every day because I knew I had to get out of the house and see other people. I much prefer doing this job in person and have no jealousy or anger towards those who prefer to WFH. I am concerned for those with support jobs or those who work jobs that rely on the foot traffic from office workers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve had a few conversations with people about the RTO push and who this benefits.
If you’ll notice, most people agitating for RTO are white guys in upper management. Why? In the office, they’re The Man. Without a staff to kiss their ass, who are they?
Furthermore, I think because presumably WFH evens the playing field for POC, as people truly are being evaluated by their output rather than intangibles like “fit,” the white guys are freaking out that the end to their long, nearly exclusive claim to power in corporate America may be fading.
Finally I think a lot of these guys want to cheat, and without “the office” as a place they go to everyday, it makes that a lot harder.
Ok, I am 100% pro WFA but this ^^^ is insane.
I think it's spot-on. Many, many women reported a sense or relief during covid because the workplace harassment stopped.
And a lot of POCs reported a feeling of relief because they were being judged on the quality of their work and not a bunch of other intangibles such as "fit" and whatnot.
Please share links to the surveys that were conducted on these issues. Not that you can, since we know you’re making it up.
Anonymous wrote:I don't care at all, but I think one should take a paycut. Generally, I think anyone who has a job that requires one to work in person, should be paid considerably more. From the grocery restocker to yard work people to teachers to construction crew to janitors to nurses.
Anonymous wrote:WFH should take a pay cut. If I have to pay gas, for a car, insurance, car maintenance, can't run errand while I "WFH" or take a nap then yes, WFH people should take a pay cut.