Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would need affordable housing and better schools in DC to live near enough to my job to bike.
For metro: I suppose I could drive and park at the metro and then metro to work - but that would take longer than driving and cost more than gas (I get free parking at work).
This is a major factor in people's choices. When there is free parking, people are more likely to choose to drive by themselves than when they have to pay for parking.
That people take cost into consideration of their choices is not revolutionary insight. Time is also a cost that people take into consideration, which is something that you don’t seem to understand.
OP's question is: What would it ACTUALLY take for you to consider biking or taking the bus, in lieu of motoring?
So one answer is: if people who currently don't have to pay for parking would have to pay for parking.
However, life is offing hard enough as it is, and we shouldn't use sticks when we can use carrots to shape behavior, especially when what we'd consider as carrots is the bare GD minimum public service in Capitals around the world.
Let's continue to make it easier to use transportation modes that aren't cars. Take the burden of transporting thousands of independent kids to school away from parents in their personally-owned vehicles. Continue to grow public transit and protected bike lanes so that as they become safer and more convenient, they become the obvious choices.
The only "stick" we really need to step us is enforcement of traffic rules in the city, including ensuring MD and VA scofflaw drivers with tens of thousand of dollars in unpaid tickets for their dangerous driving and parking habits pay those tickets and fix their behavior.
We can use sticks as well as carrots. In setting policy, we usually do use sticks as well as carrots. If you even think it's a stick to stop subsidizing "free" parking, vs. simply removal of a carrot to reward driving.
Okay but wouldn't you agree that it doesn't make sense to expend tons of policy energy forcing employees to use transit systems that still suck before doing enough to make them suck less? Having to wait 14 minutes for a busy bus at rush hour Downtown sucks especially when you have to take another one before you get home. It just doesn't make humane sense to use the stick before you're done doling out a very low bar basic level of the carrots, which means we must offer viable alternatives.
We can't improve the buses until more people ride them, and more people won't ride the buses until we improve them, and we can't improve the buses until more people ride them, and...
I don't think it would require the expenditure of tons of policy energy to stop some of the very, very many ways we subsidize driving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, the obesity rate in this country is almost 42%:https://www.tfah.org/report-details/state-of-obesity-2022/#:~:text=Nationally%2C%2041.9%20percent%20of%20adults,obesity%20rate%20of%2041.4%20percent.
Walking and biking require a degree of fitness that most folks simply don't possess. Good luck.
It's sad and true. Less than 5% of people in the US get the recommended $150 minutes of exercise a week! Pretty terrible.
Anonymous wrote:OP, the obesity rate in this country is almost 42%:https://www.tfah.org/report-details/state-of-obesity-2022/#:~:text=Nationally%2C%2041.9%20percent%20of%20adults,obesity%20rate%20of%2041.4%20percent.
Walking and biking require a degree of fitness that most folks simply don't possess. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I drive an electric car. You should take a break because this is an unhealthy obsession.
Electric cars solve one of the problems with cars, namely: tailpipe emissions. But that's the only one.
E-bikes and Electric cars have the same environmental impacts.
No, this isn’t true at all. Yes, both of them have environmental costs from battery mining, but e-bike batteries are so much smaller than car batteries that comparing them is silly. E-bikes are clearly the far superior environmental choice to electric cars (and I say that as someone who has an electric car, and also a non-electric bike).
Are you capable of not trying to claim your opinion as fact? The PP that said you are perseverating was correct.
Here are some facts. Once you have opened a mine, the marginal impact of the additional materials is less significant. You still need one mine for one E-bike and one mine for one electric car. It is the same for the whole supply chain. The rest of the materials are also the same: steel, rubber tires, etc. The only major material that cars have that e-bikes don’t is glass, but that is the most easily and best recycled material in the world.
So do you have any facts or just more opinions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With buses and public transportation generally, you are going to get a lot of people explaining that they don't want to be in close proximity to poor people. I mean, they'll say "safety" or something, but this is what they mean.
Also, some people just don't want to be in proximity to people generally, I've found. I am a longtime bus rider and have had many coworkers and neighbors tell me they couldn't do it because it means being near too many people. They don't want to make eye contact with other people, be close enough to smell them (even if they smell objectively good I guess, though as a longtime bus rider I can assure you most people do not smell objectively good, especially in the summer), and -- god forbid -- speak with them.
This is a major cultural obstacle to widespread adoption of public transportation in the US, I think. People have become very accustomed to personal space, being on their own personal timeline, not having to perform the basic niceties of being in public. Covid has made it worse. I don't know how to change it. I have always kind of liked being around other people, but I've learned I"m an outlier here.
What a ridiculous comment. I have no problem being near poor people (how would I even know they're poor)? It's the mentally ill and criminals that I'd prefer to not be around because I'd like to return home to my family at the end of the workday.