Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
1) he was about to go to jail. Why would she ruffle up his feathers and threaten to leave for DC with the kids when she could freely do this after he goes to jail?
2) how did she qualify for that executive job in DC? She was previously working the as office manager of a small local realtor's office. Before that, she had several hotel jobs working the front desk and cleaning rooms
3) with the art crime history, how did she get through security reviews for an executive position at at a global corporation?
4) if husband was smart enough to route her remains to a dumpster heading to an incinerator, how could he be so stupid to leave knife, biological remains, in such obvious places?
5) why buy hundreds of dollars of cleaning supplies only to leave many remnants of your supposed crime?
6) why google such obvious questions? It seems these googled questions were meant to be found.
7) why was the husband's father so quick to disown him? Did he at some point realize it was not his bio son?
8) how does one commute across multi-states, parent 3 young kids, give birth to one child, have a heavy social life, curate such a meticulous high end wardrobe, maintain high beauty regimen, juggle intense family legal troubles, renovate/market/sell two high end homes in different states, and more --- all in a matter of TWO YEARS?????
9) why is she not implicated for art fraud?
I totally agree with several of these, especially 2, 4, and 6. I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but I’m curious why there aren’t more out there about this case. It just seems so staged.
Anonymous wrote:there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
1) he was about to go to jail. Why would she ruffle up his feathers and threaten to leave for DC with the kids when she could freely do this after he goes to jail?
2) how did she qualify for that executive job in DC? She was previously working the as office manager of a small local realtor's office. Before that, she had several hotel jobs working the front desk and cleaning rooms
3) with the art crime history, how did she get through security reviews for an executive position at at a global corporation?
4) if husband was smart enough to route her remains to a dumpster heading to an incinerator, how could he be so stupid to leave knife, biological remains, in such obvious places?
5) why buy hundreds of dollars of cleaning supplies only to leave many remnants of your supposed crime?
6) why google such obvious questions? It seems these googled questions were meant to be found.
7) why was the husband's father so quick to disown him? Did he at some point realize it was not his bio son?
8) how does one commute across multi-states, parent 3 young kids, give birth to one child, have a heavy social life, curate such a meticulous high end wardrobe, maintain high beauty regimen, juggle intense family legal troubles, renovate/market/sell two high end homes in different states, and more --- all in a matter of TWO YEARS?????
9) why is she not implicated for art fraud?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
1) he was about to go to jail. Why would she ruffle up his feathers and threaten to leave for DC with the kids when she could freely do this after he goes to jail?
2) how did she qualify for that executive job in DC? She was previously working the as office manager of a small local realtor's office. Before that, she had several hotel jobs working the front desk and cleaning rooms
3) with the art crime history, hodid she get through security reviews for an executive position at at a global corporation?
4) if husband was smart enough to route her remains to a dumpster heading to an incinerator, how could he be so stupid to leave knife, biological remains, in such obvious places?
5) why buy hundreds of dollars of cleaning supplies only to leave many remnants of your supposed crime?
6) why google such obvious questions? It seems these googled questions were meant to be found.
7) why was the husband's father so quick to disown him? Did he at some point realize it was not his bio son?
8) how does one commute across multi-states, parent 3 young kids, give birth to one child, have a heavy social life, curate such a meticulous high end wardrobe, maintain high beauty regimen, juggle intense family legal troubles, renovate/m
arket/sell two high end homes in different states, and more --- all in a matter of TWO YEARS?????
9) why is she not implicated for art fraud?
I don't know the answer to all of your questions but I have read on many reputable sites that the property/ies were deliberately put in her name, since he owes retribution to the buyer of the fake art, as a condition.
I don't believe that her DC job was much more than a realtor?
I am given the distinct impression that the father had been bilked of much money, by his son, over the years, and also knew his son was/is a shyster. The father's lawyer must have suspected, as he accompanied him into the father's Hull house. The lawyer had taken a photo of the will (stating BW was disinherited), before BW destroyed the will.
She may not have known about the art fraud at the beginning, the time line crossover of their marriage is about the same time, and I highly doubt her told her that he bilked someone of all that money for fake art. She was called by the buyer at her work, and was supposedly cooperative - so at some point, not far into the matter, she knew what was happening.
He deliberately left his phone at home, and took a route through Boston to get to (2) different dumps, so chances are - that was 100% deliberate. He may not have known of the immediacy of the incineration, but he knew the process existed at those particular sites, seemingly. He knew he was buying time with the police.
He seemed to believe that leaving his phone at home would be enough to cover his tracks for the few days that he wasted the PD's time and was disposing of the body. Unfortunately, his ankle monitor (for the fraud) did not include GPS.
I totally agree with your first question.
For #7: his father loaned him a large chunk of money to fund flipping a house he'd bought, with the understanding that he'd repay the loan when the house sold. But instead he kept the full proceeds from the sale, left town, and stopped taking his father's calls. I gather it's unclear how he managed to worm his way back into his father's life, but I don't think it was a full reconciliation by any means.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
1) he was about to go to jail. Why would she ruffle up his feathers and threaten to leave for DC with the kids when she could freely do this after he goes to jail?
2) how did she qualify for that executive job in DC? She was previously working the as office manager of a small local realtor's office. Before that, she had several hotel jobs working the front desk and cleaning rooms
3) with the art crime history, hodid she get through security reviews for an executive position at at a global corporation?
4) if husband was smart enough to route her remains to a dumpster heading to an incinerator, how could he be so stupid to leave knife, biological remains, in such obvious places?
5) why buy hundreds of dollars of cleaning supplies only to leave many remnants of your supposed crime?
6) why google such obvious questions? It seems these googled questions were meant to be found.
7) why was the husband's father so quick to disown him? Did he at some point realize it was not his bio son?
8) how does one commute across multi-states, parent 3 young kids, give birth to one child, have a heavy social life, curate such a meticulous high end wardrobe, maintain high beauty regimen, juggle intense family legal troubles, renovate/m
arket/sell two high end homes in different states, and more --- all in a matter of TWO YEARS?????
9) why is she not implicated for art fraud?
I don't know the answer to all of your questions but I have read on many reputable sites that the property/ies were deliberately put in her name, since he owes retribution to the buyer of the fake art, as a condition.
I don't believe that her DC job was much more than a realtor?
I am given the distinct impression that the father had been bilked of much money, by his son, over the years, and also knew his son was/is a shyster. The father's lawyer must have suspected, as he accompanied him into the father's Hull house. The lawyer had taken a photo of the will (stating BW was disinherited), before BW destroyed the will.
She may not have known about the art fraud at the beginning, the time line crossover of their marriage is about the same time, and I highly doubt her told her that he bilked someone of all that money for fake art. She was called by the buyer at her work, and was supposedly cooperative - so at some point, not far into the matter, she knew what was happening.
He deliberately left his phone at home, and took a route through Boston to get to (2) different dumps, so chances are - that was 100% deliberate. He may not have known of the immediacy of the incineration, but he knew the process existed at those particular sites, seemingly. He knew he was buying time with the police.
He seemed to believe that leaving his phone at home would be enough to cover his tracks for the few days that he wasted the PD's time and was disposing of the body. Unfortunately, his ankle monitor (for the fraud) did not include GPS.
I totally agree with your first question.
Anonymous wrote:I’m reallly confused about how her background. She was apparently a housekeeper and had some small jobs and then became an executive at a real estate firm? How does she own so many properties? Their house in Chevy Chase is pretty big
Anonymous wrote:I’m reallly confused about how her background. She was apparently a housekeeper and had some small jobs and then became an executive at a real estate firm? How does she own so many properties? Their house in Chevy Chase is pretty big
Anonymous wrote:there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
1) he was about to go to jail. Why would she ruffle up his feathers and threaten to leave for DC with the kids when she could freely do this after he goes to jail?
2) how did she qualify for that executive job in DC? She was previously working the as office manager of a small local realtor's office. Before that, she had several hotel jobs working the front desk and cleaning rooms
3) with the art crime history, hodid she get through security reviews for an executive position at at a global corporation?
4) if husband was smart enough to route her remains to a dumpster heading to an incinerator, how could he be so stupid to leave knife, biological remains, in such obvious places?
5) why buy hundreds of dollars of cleaning supplies only to leave many remnants of your supposed crime?
6) why google such obvious questions? It seems these googled questions were meant to be found.
7) why was the husband's father so quick to disown him? Did he at some point realize it was not his bio son?
8) how does one commute across multi-states, parent 3 young kids, give birth to one child, have a heavy social life, curate such a meticulous high end wardrobe, maintain high beauty regimen, juggle intense family legal troubles, renovate/m
arket/sell two high end homes in different states, and more --- all in a matter of TWO YEARS?????
9) why is she not implicated for art fraud?
there is a lot about this case that does not make sense:Anonymous wrote:Really bizarre are fascinating at the same time and now her husband has been arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna64802
Anonymous wrote:Brian Walshe was jealous of his wife, and killed her.
Anonymous wrote:I literally have no words. This is beyond horrific. I really hope that their evidence is strong enough to convict him and send him away for life. I cannot imagine the trauma that these young boys will need to endure someday once they learn how their mother died at the hands of their father. This man is a monster. Who does this? Especially to the mother of his children. It also makes me sad that the boys will never have a grave where the can visit their mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I literally have no words. This is beyond horrific. I really hope that their evidence is strong enough to convict him and send him away for life. I cannot imagine the trauma that these young boys will need to endure someday once they learn how their mother died at the hands of their father. This man is a monster. Who does this? Especially to the mother of his children. It also makes me sad that the boys will never have a grave where the can visit their mother.
A man did this in CA and his parents, who have the kids, have convinced them their father in innocent, and their mother’s family is evil for wanting him punished, and the kids claim they don’t want to see their maternal family.
link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I literally have no words. This is beyond horrific. I really hope that their evidence is strong enough to convict him and send him away for life. I cannot imagine the trauma that these young boys will need to endure someday once they learn how their mother died at the hands of their father. This man is a monster. Who does this? Especially to the mother of his children. It also makes me sad that the boys will never have a grave where the can visit their mother.
A man did this in CA and his parents, who have the kids, have convinced them their father in innocent, and their mother’s family is evil for wanting him punished, and the kids claim they don’t want to see their maternal family.