Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Kate's dress and hat were more appropriate for the occasion. She (or her team?) has impeccable taste.
Kate looks perfect, as usual. I don't care for MM's hat. It looks like like a sun hat for the beach. But hats are hard to pull off or most, especially Americans that aren't used to buying and wearing them formally. Her dress is fine, but did she not keep the cape on? Someone mentioned bare arms..
The cape is part of the dress — she didn’t take it off. The “bare arms” squeals came from the forearms peeking from under the cape. More ridiculous headlines used against MM and no one else (similar to the OMG! They’re holding hands!! cry).
I made the bare arms comment. I didn’t see it criticized in the press. I just prefer arms covered at funerals and other solemn events. I don’t think she looks trashy, I was just making a comment about her fashion choice. I’m also one of those people who thinks women should only wear closed-toe shoes to the office. It’s just an opinion.
Sophie had bare arms and hands, but she wasn't called trashy. Not one person criticize her lack of gloves and her elbow length dress.
Exactly. People look at Meghan and think "what can I criticize about this." They look at other members of the royal family and look for things to praise. It's really transparent.
Bc she didn’t have bare arms. Nice try.
Actually she did. There's a picture with all the women and Sophie had elbow length dress without gloves. I personally did not see a problem with her dress. It was quite lovely, but then again, I also thought all the women, including MM looked quite lovely.
+1 You can see exactly the same amount of Sophie’s arms and Meghan’s arms,
You’re joking right? So in that one angle they are showing the same amount of arm? You are honestly comparing a coat dress to a cape dress.
Ditch the hat, change the shoes and Meghan was basically wearing a cocktail dress.
She’s wearing a black calf length dress with a high neck that does not fit very close to her body. Cocktail dress? Because you can see her forearms? You’re on crack.
I honestly think part of the issue here is that unlike most of the royals except Kate, MM is a young(ish), attractive, stylish woman. She shows them up looks wise just by showing up. She had to learn to dress as a young working actress with minimal access to stylists (she would not have been able to afford them until the last few years if her career). She us naturally very beautiful and knows how to wear clothes to make herself look good. Most of the royals don’t. She looks amazing and they look okay so she gets criticized for “breaking protocol” but the rules are very selectively enforced against her out of spite.
You say this but she has had VERY unfortunate outfits in the last couple of years. The loose drapey pink pantsuit in NYC, the red ballgown with weird bustline that looked like she stuck two soapdishes to her chest, the white trousers with weird pleats...Meghan is on record as saying she styles herself as this was "one of the last things she had control over", but the downside of that is you have no one to tell you when something you picked doesn't work, and you begin to rely on wishful thinking rather than on cold hard looks in the mirror.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Kate’s jewelry.
I like MM’s dress but the hat looks like a beach hat. She also should’ve spray tanned or worn makeup on her arms because they don’t match her face.
Charlotte is super cute.
Yees, her face was darker and she had a lot of eye makeup on. KM's makeup was really well done imo.
Anonymous wrote:Let's talk Lady Sarah Chatto, Princess Margaret's daughter and mother of 2 hot sons
![]()
Everything's great - especially love the brooch which was a gift from mom that she wore as a tiara on her wedding day. But the hat....not digging the hat.
Anonymous wrote:They’re all dressed by professionals and have been likely fitted for funerals clothes for years.
They don’t have much say in their clothing choices I think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most ridiculous thing was Jill’s black headband.
Thank you for this! I had to call my sister to take a look at Jill’s headband. It was terrible. Maybe because of her blond hair?
I actually really liked the headband. She isn't British so why wear the hat? She is very appropriately bridging the gap. It's absolutely perfect.
I agree. Nothing will ever match the outrageous hats/facinators at William and Kate’s wedding. Dr. Jill is not British, she looked appropriate. I think everyone did. I loved the Queen, but she wasn’t exactly fashionable herself, but she looked great in what she wore.
Jill is not a Dr., and she looked like Minnie.
And who are you calling "the Queen"? Can someone be more ignorant and disrespectful?
PP is right. Jill did look like Minnie Mouse.
ph.D biiiiitch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's talk Lady Sarah Chatto, Princess Margaret's daughter and mother of 2 hot sons
![]()
Everything's great - especially love the brooch which was a gift from mom that she wore as a tiara on her wedding day. But the hat....not digging the hat.
I love it all!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most ridiculous thing was Jill’s black headband.
Thank you for this! I had to call my sister to take a look at Jill’s headband. It was terrible. Maybe because of her blond hair?
I actually really liked the headband. She isn't British so why wear the hat? She is very appropriately bridging the gap. It's absolutely perfect.
I agree. Nothing will ever match the outrageous hats/facinators at William and Kate’s wedding. Dr. Jill is not British, she looked appropriate. I think everyone did. I loved the Queen, but she wasn’t exactly fashionable herself, but she looked great in what she wore.
Jill is not a Dr., and she looked like Minnie.
And who are you calling "the Queen"? Can someone be more ignorant and disrespectful?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Kate's dress and hat were more appropriate for the occasion. She (or her team?) has impeccable taste.
Kate looks perfect, as usual. I don't care for MM's hat. It looks like like a sun hat for the beach. But hats are hard to pull off or most, especially Americans that aren't used to buying and wearing them formally. Her dress is fine, but did she not keep the cape on? Someone mentioned bare arms..
The cape is part of the dress — she didn’t take it off. The “bare arms” squeals came from the forearms peeking from under the cape. More ridiculous headlines used against MM and no one else (similar to the OMG! They’re holding hands!! cry).
I made the bare arms comment. I didn’t see it criticized in the press. I just prefer arms covered at funerals and other solemn events. I don’t think she looks trashy, I was just making a comment about her fashion choice. I’m also one of those people who thinks women should only wear closed-toe shoes to the office. It’s just an opinion.
Sophie had bare arms and hands, but she wasn't called trashy. Not one person criticize her lack of gloves and her elbow length dress.
Exactly. People look at Meghan and think "what can I criticize about this." They look at other members of the royal family and look for things to praise. It's really transparent.
Bc she didn’t have bare arms. Nice try.
Actually she did. There's a picture with all the women and Sophie had elbow length dress without gloves. I personally did not see a problem with her dress. It was quite lovely, but then again, I also thought all the women, including MM looked quite lovely.
+1 You can see exactly the same amount of Sophie’s arms and Meghan’s arms,
You’re joking right? So in that one angle they are showing the same amount of arm? You are honestly comparing a coat dress to a cape dress.
Ditch the hat, change the shoes and Meghan was basically wearing a cocktail dress.
She’s wearing a black calf length dress with a high neck that does not fit very close to her body. Cocktail dress? Because you can see her forearms? You’re on crack.
I honestly think part of the issue here is that unlike most of the royals except Kate, MM is a young(ish), attractive, stylish woman. She shows them up looks wise just by showing up. She had to learn to dress as a young working actress with minimal access to stylists (she would not have been able to afford them until the last few years if her career). She us naturally very beautiful and knows how to wear clothes to make herself look good. Most of the royals don’t. She looks amazing and they look okay so she gets criticized for “breaking protocol” but the rules are very selectively enforced against her out of spite.
You say this but she has had VERY unfortunate outfits in the last couple of years. The loose drapey pink pantsuit in NYC, the red ballgown with weird bustline that looked like she stuck two soapdishes to her chest, the white trousers with weird pleats...Meghan is on record as saying she styles herself as this was "one of the last things she had control over", but the downside of that is you have no one to tell you when something you picked doesn't work, and you begin to rely on wishful thinking rather than on cold hard looks in the mirror.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Kate's dress and hat were more appropriate for the occasion. She (or her team?) has impeccable taste.
Kate looks perfect, as usual. I don't care for MM's hat. It looks like like a sun hat for the beach. But hats are hard to pull off or most, especially Americans that aren't used to buying and wearing them formally. Her dress is fine, but did she not keep the cape on? Someone mentioned bare arms..
The cape is part of the dress — she didn’t take it off. The “bare arms” squeals came from the forearms peeking from under the cape. More ridiculous headlines used against MM and no one else (similar to the OMG! They’re holding hands!! cry).
I made the bare arms comment. I didn’t see it criticized in the press. I just prefer arms covered at funerals and other solemn events. I don’t think she looks trashy, I was just making a comment about her fashion choice. I’m also one of those people who thinks women should only wear closed-toe shoes to the office. It’s just an opinion.
Sophie had bare arms and hands, but she wasn't called trashy. Not one person criticize her lack of gloves and her elbow length dress.
Exactly. People look at Meghan and think "what can I criticize about this." They look at other members of the royal family and look for things to praise. It's really transparent.
Bc she didn’t have bare arms. Nice try.
Actually she did. There's a picture with all the women and Sophie had elbow length dress without gloves. I personally did not see a problem with her dress. It was quite lovely, but then again, I also thought all the women, including MM looked quite lovely.
+1 You can see exactly the same amount of Sophie’s arms and Meghan’s arms,
You’re joking right? So in that one angle they are showing the same amount of arm? You are honestly comparing a coat dress to a cape dress.
Ditch the hat, change the shoes and Meghan was basically wearing a cocktail dress.
She’s wearing a black calf length dress with a high neck that does not fit very close to her body. Cocktail dress? Because you can see her forearms? You’re on crack.
I honestly think part of the issue here is that unlike most of the royals except Kate, MM is a young(ish), attractive, stylish woman. She shows them up looks wise just by showing up. She had to learn to dress as a young working actress with minimal access to stylists (she would not have been able to afford them until the last few years if her career). She us naturally very beautiful and knows how to wear clothes to make herself look good. Most of the royals don’t. She looks amazing and they look okay so she gets criticized for “breaking protocol” but the rules are very selectively enforced against her out of spite.
Anonymous wrote:Beatrice and Eugenie dress in the quirky manner of British aristocracy. To our American eye it looks tacky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jill’s headband looked absurd. You don’t wear fancy party fascinators to funerals
The headband was RIDICULOUS, especially for the wife of the leader of the free world. Zara Tindall’s hat was of the fascinator genre and wasn’t the best look, either. I haven’t seen that mentioned here.