Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats agreed to work through the weekend to pass a very important climate support bill and GOP cannot stop whining because they cannot block governing this time.

Ha Ha,


You are even calling it a “Climate” bill.

So much for it being the “Inflation Reduction Act”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When companies lose their tax breaks, consumer goods will go up and layoffs will happen. Y’all are aware of that, right?

We are considering layoffs at our firm. We were “considering”… our management team will need to look over this bill carefully but will likely lead to definite layoffs if our tax load increases. Our profit margins are very small due to the already high cost of employee compensation and is overpaying to get people o the door. There is a point when yo I look at an employee and say , yeah, they are not with the $$$$ for what they are doing…

Yeah, simple. You raise taxes and companies make less money. That always leads to job cuts as they need to maintain profitability. They can’t print money like the federal reserve.

This is moronic to raise taxes on companies as the economy is sliding into a recession.

Looks like they were not all that great of a company then.

Every company cuts jobs in a recession. Must stay profitable to stay in business. You are speaking like someone who has never owned a business… probably a govt worker.

You sound like the typical greedy business owner. Suck it.

If you mean greedy as trying to keep the company afloat and help as many people keep their jobs and pay them as well as I can so they can provide for their families, sure.

Anonymous wrote:Democrats agreed to work through the weekend to pass a very important climate support bill and GOP cannot stop whining because they cannot block governing this time.

Republican lawmakers on Sunday successfully stripped a $35 price cap on the cost of insulin for many patients from the ambitious legislative package Democrats are moving through Congress this weekend, invoking arcane Senate rules to jettison the measure.

As expected, key insulin provisions were struck out of the bill after Republicans raised a point of order, resulting in a vote to strip them out.

The final vote was 57-43. A 60-vote threshold was needed to keep the provision in place.

The provisions initially included in the bill would have limited insulin prices to $35 per month in both the private insurance market as well as through Medicare. But the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the cap on insulin in the private insurance market was not compliant with the reconciliation rules Democrats are utilizing to push their legislation through the chamber.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When companies lose their tax breaks, consumer goods will go up and layoffs will happen. Y’all are aware of that, right?

We are considering layoffs at our firm. We were “considering”… our management team will need to look over this bill carefully but will likely lead to definite layoffs if our tax load increases. Our profit margins are very small due to the already high cost of employee compensation and is overpaying to get people o the door. There is a point when yo I look at an employee and say , yeah, they are not with the $$$$ for what they are doing…

Yeah, simple. You raise taxes and companies make less money. That always leads to job cuts as they need to maintain profitability. They can’t print money like the federal reserve.

This is moronic to raise taxes on companies as the economy is sliding into a recession.

Looks like they were not all that great of a company then.

Every company cuts jobs in a recession. Must stay profitable to stay in business. You are speaking like someone who has never owned a business… probably a govt worker.

So you are either a govt employee where you don’t have to worry about your job or you are a stay at home parent who does not work.

If you mean greedy as trying to keep the company afloat and help as many people keep their jobs and pay them as well as I can so they can provide for their families, sure.
You sound like the typical greedy business owner. Suck it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When companies lose their tax breaks, consumer goods will go up and layoffs will happen. Y’all are aware of that, right?

We are considering layoffs at our firm. We were “considering”… our management team will need to look over this bill carefully but will likely lead to definite layoffs if our tax load increases. Our profit margins are very small due to the already high cost of employee compensation and is overpaying to get people o the door. There is a point when yo I look at an employee and say , yeah, they are not with the $$$$ for what they are doing…

Yeah, simple. You raise taxes and companies make less money. That always leads to job cuts as they need to maintain profitability. They can’t print money like the federal reserve.

This is moronic to raise taxes on companies as the economy is sliding into a recession.

Looks like they were not all that great of a company then.

Every company cuts jobs in a recession. Must stay profitable to stay in business. You are speaking like someone who has never owned a business… probably a govt worker.

You sound like the typical greedy business owner. Suck it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When companies lose their tax breaks, consumer goods will go up and layoffs will happen. Y’all are aware of that, right?

We are considering layoffs at our firm. We were “considering”… our management team will need to look over this bill carefully but will likely lead to definite layoffs if our tax load increases. Our profit margins are very small due to the already high cost of employee compensation and is overpaying to get people o the door. There is a point when yo I look at an employee and say , yeah, they are not with the $$$$ for what they are doing…

Yeah, simple. You raise taxes and companies make less money. That always leads to job cuts as they need to maintain profitability. They can’t print money like the federal reserve.

This is moronic to raise taxes on companies as the economy is sliding into a recession.

Looks like they were not all that great of a company then.

Every company cuts jobs in a recession. Must stay profitable to stay in business. You are speaking like someone who has never owned a business… probably a govt worker.

So you are either a govt employee where you don’t have to worry about your job or you are a stay at home parent who does not work.

If you mean greedy as trying to keep the company afloat and help as many people keep their jobs and pay them as well as I can so they can provide for their families, sure.
You sound like the typical greedy business owner. Suck it.

Anonymous wrote:In 2023 during the election, when economy is in a recession, unemployment is at 9%, we can thank this bill for helping us get there. Just watch. Just like the reckless spending for us into this soaring inflation problem that they said (Yellin in particular and admin) was nothing to worry about and transitory…