Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.

Does every broke child have loving stable parents? Some do, just like some rich kids do. Britney seems loving and is rich. As for stability, she can buy that with good household help. On balance I think Britney’s kid is better off then 80 pct of the babies born in America because she can buy the baby whatever support it needs.

You can’t buy stability. A serious ill parent is not an issue for a child that can be solved by money. A child raised by the “help” because their mother and/or father are incapable of creating and being a stable parent, will have a profoundly negative impact on their life.

Oh please. Even if her child is raised by the "help", her child will be better off than 90% of the kids in America dropped in low-quality daycares or at home with parents living paycheck to paycheck.

Only poor people think money solves everything.

Not quite. I’ve been immigrant without many outside resources and am now well off and I can safely say that while money doesn’t solve everything, it certainly reduces a lot of stress to be able to hire all the childcare and household support you need.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.

Does every broke child have loving stable parents? Some do, just like some rich kids do. Britney seems loving and is rich. As for stability, she can buy that with good household help. On balance I think Britney’s kid is better off then 80 pct of the babies born in America because she can buy the baby whatever support it needs.

You can’t buy stability. A serious ill parent is not an issue for a child that can be solved by money. A child raised by the “help” because their mother and/or father are incapable of creating and being a stable parent, will have a profoundly negative impact on their life.

Oh please. Even if her child is raised by the "help", her child will be better off than 90% of the kids in America dropped in low-quality daycares or at home with parents living paycheck to paycheck.

Only poor people think money solves everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.

Does every broke child have loving stable parents? Some do, just like some rich kids do. Britney seems loving and is rich. As for stability, she can buy that with good household help. On balance I think Britney’s kid is better off then 80 pct of the babies born in America because she can buy the baby whatever support it needs.

You can’t buy stability. A serious ill parent is not an issue for a child that can be solved by money. A child raised by the “help” because their mother and/or father are incapable of creating and being a stable parent, will have a profoundly negative impact on their life.

Oh please. Even if her child is raised by the "help", her child will be better off than 90% of the kids in America dropped in low-quality daycares or at home with parents living paycheck to paycheck.

Anonymous wrote:Her sons were not present.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.

Does every broke child have loving stable parents? Some do, just like some rich kids do. Britney seems loving and is rich. As for stability, she can buy that with good household help. On balance I think Britney’s kid is better off then 80 pct of the babies born in America because she can buy the baby whatever support it needs.

You can’t buy stability. A serious ill parent is not an issue for a child that can be solved by money. A child raised by the “help” because their mother and/or father are incapable of creating and being a stable parent, will have a profoundly negative impact on their life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.

Does every broke child have loving stable parents? Some do, just like some rich kids do. Britney seems loving and is rich. As for stability, she can buy that with good household help. On balance I think Britney’s kid is better off then 80 pct of the babies born in America because she can buy the baby whatever support it needs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some really mean people on here.

Plus 1.

+1. Babies are a blessing. Don’t be nasty when there’s a loss.

I think a child not being born to a unstable parent is a blessing. Every child is a blessing but not every child is treated like a blessing. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is no.

Oh please. No parent is perfect. Britney is at least rich enough to buy stable care for her kids and seems to love them.

Isn't is better to be broke with loving, stable parents, than rich with dismissive, unstable parents? I would rather be poor and have a good, mentally sound mother.