Anonymous
04/18/2022 18:09
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
Here’s his “vision” operating at Tesla. Doesn’t seem very free speechy.
Of course
Wow, I didn't realize that calling people the N word is so normal in the Bay Area. Is that really common in California, or just in San Francisco?
California was the largest source of votes for Trump in 2020 of any single state. Trump got more votes in California than TX or FL.
Anonymous
04/18/2022 18:02
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wants to ban people who criticize him. He wants to spread misinformation and manipulate stock values. That’s all he does on social media.
You just hate seeing an African get ahead.
+1
Why does the left harbor such hate?
Why are you such a snowflake?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 15:17
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
Here’s his “vision” operating at Tesla. Doesn’t seem very free speechy.
Of course
Wow, I didn't realize that calling people the N word is so normal in the Bay Area. Is that really common in California, or just in San Francisco?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 15:12
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
Here’s his “vision” operating at Tesla. Doesn’t seem very free speechy.
Of course
Anonymous
04/18/2022 15:10
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wants to ban people who criticize him. He wants to spread misinformation and manipulate stock values. That’s all he does on social media.
You just hate seeing an African get ahead.
+1
Why does the left harbor such hate?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 08:51
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:He wants to ban people who criticize him. He wants to spread misinformation and manipulate stock values. That’s all he does on social media.
You just hate seeing an African get ahead.
Anonymous
04/18/2022 08:34
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Link?
Twitter shareholders: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/twitter-shareholder-elon-musk/amp
SolarCity shareholders: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/07/12/elon-musk-testifies-in-tesla-shareholder-lawsuit-over-solarcity-acquisition.html
Tesla shareholders: https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20200416/NEWS06/912334076/Tesla,-Elon-Musk-face-shareholder-lawsuit-over-going-private-tweet-In-re-Tesla-I
Shall I go on?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 06:07
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
He wants to ban people who criticize him. He wants to spread misinformation and manipulate stock values. That’s all he does on social media.
Anonymous
04/18/2022 01:15
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Link?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 01:13
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Elon is not wrong.
He should know, I think he’s being sued by shareholders for that right now.
Anonymous
Anonymous
04/18/2022 00:59
Subject: Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Haters and grifters. Once he owns the company he can do what he sees fit and I’m here for it.
Anonymous
04/18/2022 00:23
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
Here’s his “vision” operating at Tesla. Doesn’t seem very free speechy.
Anonymous
04/18/2022 00:21
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
This is his “vision” at Tesla. Supportive of “free speech” or no?
Anonymous
04/18/2022 00:16
Subject: Re:Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a dumb statement because viruses mutate and Delta and Omicron have breakthrough cases, but with mild symptoms. The vaccines worked the way vaccines work. Mild cases are not failures. Deaths and severe cases were what it was all about. Unvaccinated people died who would have had mild cases if vaccinated.
That is besides the point. The point was that any voices that didn’t affirm the narrative of vaccines preventing transmission were censored only 12 months ago. Reflect honestly if you are ok with that, and if there may be times in the future where you may be the one silenced. I find it astonishing that this conversation even needs to be had. I guess we can never take our freedoms for granted.
You making shit up. The misinformation that was removed were bat-shit crazy conspiracies and dangerous medical frauds. Things that were killing and endangering people. Not simple disagreements about the level of immunity from vaccines.
Not interested in your bad faith convo. Just remember, never in the past have the people promoting censorship been the good guys.
Allowing businesses to operate with their own rules is not censorship.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see Musk shape it according to his vision.
This is his “vision” at Tesla. Does this behavior support the concept of free speech?