Anonymous wrote:Sidwell and the other private schools should tell parents when they apply to high school "not to expect to get a leg up in college admissions by being here." Maybe it would turn away some families, but this is where it should start.
Anonymous wrote:Why are Sidwell parents not totally humiliated by this thread.
Are they not aware that they project the image of entitled crazy people?
Anonymous wrote:How does Sidwell justify the lack of open access to Naviance? That’s so incredibly paternalistic. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a parent revolt.
Anonymous wrote:
At a regularly scheduled 12th grade parent meeting--so not college placement or CCO related and the CCO people do not attend--someone asked the upper school head whether they would be collecting parent feedback about the college application process and the CCO. His reaction was priceless: it was as if the idea had never occurred to him and he was pretty clear that they were not interested in parent feedback. He did give lip service to say that "of course" parents could always provide feedback, but it was apparent that any such feedback would be unwanted.
Anonymous wrote:Did the tough grading policies apply to Mailia Obama. Just curious.Anonymous wrote:Sidwell Senior Parent. NP. On a related but slightly different note: I believe we are finally starting to see what the rather tough grading policies at Sidwell are starting to do to admissions outcomes. Rampant grade inflation elsewhere, the elimination of standardized tests and gradual disinclination towards "elite" private schools is making it harder each year for Sidwell students to stand out. With Covid, strong ECs have been hard to build for many students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the elephant in the room is that a good chunk of the very top students are “stranded”. They are doing less well than the bottom 85% of the class. Yield protected at likelies/matches and not into any SCEA or ED. Sidwell needs an explicit strategy for these kids. It’s not to late to advocate for this group imo. No entitlement here at all. I don’t think CCO gets the macro picture here. These kids had safeties but safeties are not acting like safeties for this high performing group.
I know the kids you're talking about, because my kid is their peer and in most of their classes.
What you didn't include in your otherwise instructive post is that most of these kids picked a very tough Ivy or Stanford as their SCEA or ED -- with absolutely foreseeable results. I think that's the most relevant detail, actually. Also, most didn't ED2, so the 'stranded' characterization is premature at best and, it must be pointed out, it's a risk to forego ED2 and they chose to take that risk. Finally, a number of these kids have at least one EA in hand at a top 25 school. No one is "stranded" when they can go to Chicago or Michigan next fall.
I seem to have an outlier view of the purpose and capabilities of a college counselor at Sidwell, Dalton, Westlake, New Trier, Andover, etc. I don't view them as agents who earn their money by securing prime bookings for their top talent. Nor are they talented litigators who get paid more when they successfully persuade skeptical juries to come around. Not saying you do, but not a few parents in this class talk this way. It upsets my own senior because they talk as if the CC office is the help and it's gross.
So, if Sidwell students get rejected, well, they were yield protected but if a magnet such as TJ's students get rejected, then it is the mocking time. Just look at the thread drudged up for 2016 class for TJ. TJ does way better than Sidwell even with having 70% Asians (which is a huge disadvantage) and having virtually no connections/legacies/athletes/URM. Do better Sidwell parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does Sidwell justify the lack of open access to Naviance? That’s so incredibly paternalistic. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a parent revolt.
What does a parent revolt at a school like Sidwell look like?
I suppose it would start with a group of concerned parents working to schedule a meeting with the counseling department or school head?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does Sidwell justify the lack of open access to Naviance? That’s so incredibly paternalistic. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a parent revolt.
What does a parent revolt at a school like Sidwell look like?
I suppose it would start with a group of concerned parents working to schedule a meeting with the counseling department or school head?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, this is just embarrassing for SFS. You guys need to stopped or at least move it to the private school section.
The forum is College and University Discussion, and doesn't specify only for public school. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does Sidwell justify the lack of open access to Naviance? That’s so incredibly paternalistic. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a parent revolt.
What does a parent revolt at a school like Sidwell look like?