Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:34
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will never forget the case that changed Ireland's views on abortion and it was less than 10 years ago. I just remember it was a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant. Something came up later in the pregnancy and the only way she was going to survive was to have an abortion. Being Ireland, she couldn't get it. She did die week later, and of course the fetus died too. How many times will the US go through things like that to decide "yeah, perhaps an abortion is needed more in the medical sense than we thought".
Yup and it just happened in Poland too. There were huge protests and the government basically said, whoops, we didn’t mean it to turn out that way. Oh well. We’ll pray about it. Sorry she’s dead.
And too many women just don’t care, because they’re worried about CRT or some other made up bull to protect the rights of poor women and girls. Maybe when NoVa white women finally find their healthcare impacted in our newly red state, they will wake the hell up.
I’ll say it again: women need to vote 100% pro choice, i.e., in recognition that we are people. There is no “pro-life” vote, there is only a forced-birth, anti-woman vote.
And yet we’ve got a lot of Aunt Lydia’s out there who don’t care, and see it’s to their benefit to subjugate the rest of us.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:26
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will never forget the case that changed Ireland's views on abortion and it was less than 10 years ago. I just remember it was a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant. Something came up later in the pregnancy and the only way she was going to survive was to have an abortion. Being Ireland, she couldn't get it. She did die week later, and of course the fetus died too. How many times will the US go through things like that to decide "yeah, perhaps an abortion is needed more in the medical sense than we thought".
Yup and it just happened in Poland too. There were huge protests and the government basically said, whoops, we didn’t mean it to turn out that way. Oh well. We’ll pray about it. Sorry she’s dead.
And too many women just don’t care, because they’re worried about CRT or some other made up bull to protect the rights of poor women and girls. Maybe when NoVa white women finally find their healthcare impacted in our newly red state, they will wake the hell up.
I’ll say it again: women need to vote 100% pro choice, i.e., in recognition that we are people. There is no “pro-life” vote, there is only a forced-birth, anti-woman vote.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:19
Subject: Re:SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yep, here we are. We got gaslighted by “liberal” men and Bernie supporters and here we are. Because “Hillary is the same as Trump only worse.” Screw all you third party voters. You didn’t get the message in 2000, you failed to get it in 2016 and you just barely got it in 2020. So here we sit with women poised to become second class citizens.
I think a lot of those "leftwing" Twitter accounts in 2016 were run by foreign governments and the GOP network to mess with voters and dissuade Democratic turnout. It works on the margins and tipped a very close election.
It worked, and the narrative was adopted and pushed by real life dumbasses on the the left.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:18
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will never forget the case that changed Ireland's views on abortion and it was less than 10 years ago. I just remember it was a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant. Something came up later in the pregnancy and the only way she was going to survive was to have an abortion. Being Ireland, she couldn't get it. She did die week later, and of course the fetus died too. How many times will the US go through things like that to decide "yeah, perhaps an abortion is needed more in the medical sense than we thought".
Yup and it just happened in Poland too. There were huge protests and the government basically said, whoops, we didn’t mean it to turn out that way. Oh well. We’ll pray about it. Sorry she’s dead.
And too many women just don’t care, because they’re worried about CRT or some other made up bull to protect the rights of poor women and girls. Maybe when NoVa white women finally find their healthcare impacted in our newly red state, they will wake the hell up.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:17
Subject: Re:SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:
Yep, here we are. We got gaslighted by “liberal” men and Bernie supporters and here we are. Because “Hillary is the same as Trump only worse.” Screw all you third party voters. You didn’t get the message in 2000, you failed to get it in 2016 and you just barely got it in 2020. So here we sit with women poised to become second class citizens.
I think a lot of those "leftwing" Twitter accounts in 2016 were run by foreign governments and the GOP network to mess with voters and dissuade Democratic turnout. It works on the margins and tipped a very close election.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:16
Subject: Re:SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Yep, here we are. We got gaslighted by “liberal” men and Bernie supporters and here we are. Because “Hillary is the same as Trump only worse.” Screw all you third party voters. You didn’t get the message in 2000, you failed to get it in 2016 and you just barely got it in 2020. So here we sit with women poised to become second class citizens.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:12
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Expand the court.
Yes! SCOTUS was expanded to implement laws that the majority do NOT want.
The Court is corrupt. Sad to see. Time to put it back in balance.
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/02/2021 12:05
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:I will never forget the case that changed Ireland's views on abortion and it was less than 10 years ago. I just remember it was a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant. Something came up later in the pregnancy and the only way she was going to survive was to have an abortion. Being Ireland, she couldn't get it. She did die week later, and of course the fetus died too. How many times will the US go through things like that to decide "yeah, perhaps an abortion is needed more in the medical sense than we thought".
Yup and it just happened in Poland too. There were huge protests and the government basically said, whoops, we didn’t mean it to turn out that way. Oh well. We’ll pray about it. Sorry she’s dead.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/02/2021 11:54
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:
So, you don't think MS doctors believe in the Hippocratic Oath and will watch a patient hemmorage to death? What an imagination you have.
https://safehealthcareforeverywoman.org/wp-content/uploads/AIM-Impact-Statements-June-2021.pdf
Reality: In Louisiana, hemorrhage was the leading cause of pregnancy-related death. between 2011 and 2016.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 11:51
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, I think these laws will affect lots of middle and upper middle class white women in Southern states.
Let's say you live in southern Georgia. Your conservative husband is a local attorney making very good money, you're a stay-at-home mom who is pregnant. Suddenly, you start hemorrhaging and you need an abortion ASAP.
Where the hell are you going to go? You're many hundreds of miles from the nearest state that can provide you with such a procedure (likely Virginia or Maryland). You can't be transported in your current state. No amount of money will save your life.
I think scenes like this will happen VERY quickly after GOP controlled states outlaw abortion. Many of these laws are not providing any provisions for the health of the mother, rape, or incest. These are zero tolerance laws.
MS ban allows them in medical emergencies. It wouldn't happen at a planned parenthood anyway. Hello. I'm hemmoraging, let me find nearest planned parenthood for an abortion??? No, you go to a hospital.
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/2019/pdf/history/SB/SB2116.xml
And if you think that’s going to save women’s lives, you’re nuts. If there’s any question at all, women will be left to die; CYA medicine will mean just that. What are the provider penalties for performing abortions? You think a doctor is going to risk their license? Like Mississippi wasn’t already backwater enough.
So, you don't think MS doctors believe in the Hippocratic Oath and will watch a patient hemmorage to death? What an imagination you have.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 11:51
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember when people said the left was being over the top and hysterical when Kavanaugh and Barrett were confirmed?
Ya, that was fun.
Ya, privileged DC far left elitists should dictate what health laws the people of Mississippi want for themselves because. . . that's democracy.
The Mississippi abortion law has absolutely nothing to do with what Mississippians want for themselves. It is entirely about controlling what OTHER people can and can’t do.
We don't care what they do in Mississippi, let them have what they want. But we want to keep all our rights in the blue free states, and don't what to have them taken away by a conservative religious theocracy.
Anonymous
12/02/2021 11:47
Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember when people said the left was being over the top and hysterical when Kavanaugh and Barrett were confirmed?
Ya, that was fun.
Ya, privileged DC far left elitists should dictate what health laws the people of Mississippi want for themselves because. . . that's democracy.
The Mississippi abortion law has absolutely nothing to do with what Mississippians want for themselves. It is entirely about controlling what OTHER people can and can’t do.