Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
By putting Duke at #5 and Brown #6 above Princeton at #9. This ranking is a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
By putting Duke at #5 and Brown #6 above Princeton at #9. This ranking is a joke.
Forbes is worse with UCB at 1. So I'll take this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
By putting Duke at #5 and Brown #6 above Princeton at #9. This ranking is a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
Brown is abysmal when it comes to pretty much any metric that academe cares about. It simply isn’t a heavyweight. And it’s undergrad is by far its most prestigious component, which is a little sad considering that even its undergrad is not all that, just famous for being loosey-goosey and liberal. The only reason it’s even relevant is because it rides on the coattails of the likes of HYP — more successful and significantly more relevant in every single aspect.
Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
Anonymous wrote:Haha I guess your kid didn’t get into Brown. It is a school that is taken very seriously in academia and that’s why the WSJ ranked it #6.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Brown is #6 and also a fun place to go to school are reasons why it is so popular with applicants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia College. Which one? Chicago, Missouri, South Carolina, Hollywood or New York? I must be missing a few….
I have affiliations with neither school. People know Columbia University. Unlike the University of Pennsylvania, which is often associated with a state school.
DS had friends who went there. A&S students have some massive inferiority complex to Wharton. Joke still goes that there are three kinds of students at Penn: "those who attend Wharton, those who want to transfer into Wharton, and those who want to marry a Wharton grad."
True. And Penn A&S simply is the weakest of its kind within the Ivy League.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia College. Which one? Chicago, Missouri, South Carolina, Hollywood or New York? I must be missing a few….
I have affiliations with neither school. People know Columbia University. Unlike the University of Pennsylvania, which is often associated with a state school.
DS had friends who went there. A&S students have some massive inferiority complex to Wharton. Joke still goes that there are three kinds of students at Penn: "those who attend Wharton, those who want to transfer into Wharton, and those who want to marry a Wharton grad."
True. And Penn A&S simply is the weakest of its kind within the Ivy League.
Untrue and ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia College. Which one? Chicago, Missouri, South Carolina, Hollywood or New York? I must be missing a few….
I have affiliations with neither school. People know Columbia University. Unlike the University of Pennsylvania, which is often associated with a state school.
DS had friends who went there. A&S students have some massive inferiority complex to Wharton. Joke still goes that there are three kinds of students at Penn: "those who attend Wharton, those who want to transfer into Wharton, and those who want to marry a Wharton grad."
True. And Penn A&S simply is the weakest of its kind within the Ivy League.