Anonymous wrote:Accusations are one thing, proof another.
Where is the proof to all of these accusations?
I’d love to see actual proof.
Oh, you effing Russian troll!!
I love this "proof" crap!!
What are you looking for, DNA evidence?
The statute of limitations has long past for a criminal conviction, Natalia.
But when at least 8 women who don't know one another come out in public to say that Roy Moore sexually assaulted them when they were teenagers, well, that's not proof in the legal sense, but that's pretty compelling evidence.
Also, there is a lot more evidence: Moore was banned from a local mall because he was prowling the mall looking for teens to date (this was when he was in his 30s). Others have come forward to complain about his teen-dating habits.
There's plenty of evidence Moore is a predator. He does not deserve a seat in the US Senate.