Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 23:34     Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m 1000000% convinced Ryan was writing her dramatic crazy emails and texts.



My takeaway from this is that the earlier PP was right: MAGA is Team Justin/ some of this is republicans trying to use this as an excuse to take down two prominent liberals.


A liberal who got married on a plantation.ok.


And set up dinner in the slave quarters.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 23:26     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Travis kelce last Instagram is getting pummeled. Loool
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 23:25     Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m 1000000% convinced Ryan was writing her dramatic crazy emails and texts.



My takeaway from this is that the earlier PP was right: MAGA is Team Justin/ some of this is republicans trying to use this as an excuse to take down two prominent liberals.


A liberal who got married on a plantation.ok.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 23:24     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.


No one is saying it was a plan with the other actresses. However it was what BL clearly wanted and she influenced those around her.


But Slate, Saks, and Hoover all seem to have arrived at their negative opinions on their own, before even talking to Lively. I don't see how you can argue she influenced them when there is text evidence they were frustrated or offended by Baldoni/Heath before some of these women had even met Blake.


The same hoover who knew Justin years prior and had no problem until it was time to join the cool kids (or she thought) club, right? Lol. I hope she has enough royalties to live until she dies. I see a mea culpa in the future.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 22:50     Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:I’m 1000000% convinced Ryan was writing her dramatic crazy emails and texts.



My takeaway from this is that the earlier PP was right: MAGA is Team Justin/ some of this is republicans trying to use this as an excuse to take down two prominent liberals.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 22:39     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.


No one is saying it was a plan with the other actresses. However it was what BL clearly wanted and she influenced those around her.


But Slate, Saks, and Hoover all seem to have arrived at their negative opinions on their own, before even talking to Lively. I don't see how you can argue she influenced them when there is text evidence they were frustrated or offended by Baldoni/Heath before some of these women had even met Blake.


There is text evidence showing she both influenced them and twisted frustration into SH to support her own claims. Jenny slate says in her deposition she felt her issues with Justin were resolved on set and this is not her lawsuit. Blake is using Jenny and twisting interactions that Jenny did not feel rose to the level of SH to fit Blake’s own narrative. Isabella testified in her deposition that when she texted Justin thanking him for creating a safe set that was reflective of how she felt at the time. So what changed? Isabella’s work with Justin was done. Oh, right she met Blake. And then there’s Colleen who if anything only had creative differences with Justin. Colleen has never once accused Justin of SH. And she testified in her deposition that Blake asked her to unfollow Justin. There is also a group chat between Justin’s agent, Blake’s agent, and the head of WME calling Blake the “ringleader” of the drama and asking for help “powering her down”. Whether or not these women liked Justin is not on trial here. Blake has brought serious career ending allegations of SH and the evidence does not support it. She’s trying to Frankenstein her way to a case by exaggerating every little problem that anyone ever had to fit her twisted narrative. If all of these women were SH’d, why hasn’t a single one joined Blake’s lawsuit?


+ 1.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 22:04     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.


No one is saying it was a plan with the other actresses. However it was what BL clearly wanted and she influenced those around her.


But Slate, Saks, and Hoover all seem to have arrived at their negative opinions on their own, before even talking to Lively. I don't see how you can argue she influenced them when there is text evidence they were frustrated or offended by Baldoni/Heath before some of these women had even met Blake.


There is text evidence showing she both influenced them and twisted frustration into SH to support her own claims. Jenny slate says in her deposition she felt her issues with Justin were resolved on set and this is not her lawsuit. Blake is using Jenny and twisting interactions that Jenny did not feel rose to the level of SH to fit Blake’s own narrative. Isabella testified in her deposition that when she texted Justin thanking him for creating a safe set that was reflective of how she felt at the time. So what changed? Isabella’s work with Justin was done. Oh, right she met Blake. And then there’s Colleen who if anything only had creative differences with Justin. Colleen has never once accused Justin of SH. And she testified in her deposition that Blake asked her to unfollow Justin. There is also a group chat between Justin’s agent, Blake’s agent, and the head of WME calling Blake the “ringleader” of the drama and asking for help “powering her down”. Whether or not these women liked Justin is not on trial here. Blake has brought serious career ending allegations of SH and the evidence does not support it. She’s trying to Frankenstein her way to a case by exaggerating every little problem that anyone ever had to fit her twisted narrative. If all of these women were SH’d, why hasn’t a single one joined Blake’s lawsuit?
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 19:56     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.


No one is saying it was a plan with the other actresses. However it was what BL clearly wanted and she influenced those around her.


But Slate, Saks, and Hoover all seem to have arrived at their negative opinions on their own, before even talking to Lively. I don't see how you can argue she influenced them when there is text evidence they were frustrated or offended by Baldoni/Heath before some of these women had even met Blake.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 19:47     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.


No one is saying it was a plan with the other actresses. However it was what BL clearly wanted and she influenced those around her.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 19:34     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no sexual harassment. Period.

There were creative differences which could have been handled better rather than what happened here: a diva launched a brutal and unnecessary campaign to pull rank, incite chaos, and ultimately destroy a colleague in a very public, highly orchestrated manner involving outsiders.

She chose these path and deserves to suffer the consequences.


It was all a cooked up scheme to destroy this guy and steal his movie. These people are demons.



And the other actresses were in on the "scheme"? Bullshit.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 19:20     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Lively had this exact same M.O. over 20 years ago on the set of Gossip Girl. She tried to destroy Penn Badgley’s life and reputation for totally fictitious reasons. And Swift has been doing the same to basically every man she’s ever been linked to. They’re both mentally unwell trash.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 18:31     Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:LOL



This will go great!

I’m sure her legal team will try their hardest to prep her and she’ll blow off all the sessions and have Ryan berate them all with fun nicknames like “textbook ineffectual elderly people.”
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 16:01     Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

LOL

Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 15:44     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is how Blake and Ryan’s teams let them self destruct this way. It’s obvious they are both fools but they are extremely wealthy a listers so they must have high powered teams.


They’re uneducated dumb as rocks egomaniacs. They never thought it would get this far because they figured he’d lay day and they’d get everything they wanted. Now they’re getting milked and burning millions of dollars on lawyers, PR, and consultants. They’re too stupid to know to cut their losses and realize their careers are over. It’s fantastic karma.


+1 you get paid more to clean up messes than keeping things tidy
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 15:39     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is how Blake and Ryan’s teams let them self destruct this way. It’s obvious they are both fools but they are extremely wealthy a listers so they must have high powered teams.


They’re uneducated dumb as rocks egomaniacs. They never thought it would get this far because they figured he’d lay day and they’d get everything they wanted. Now they’re getting milked and burning millions of dollars on lawyers, PR, and consultants. They’re too stupid to know to cut their losses and realize their careers are over. It’s fantastic karma.