Anonymous wrote:She posted on Facebook today telling Westfield people to leave comments on the boundary tool. OY VEY.
Anonymous wrote:SHe also said that many Westfield parents have contacted her in the last week. I guess they gave up on hearing back from anyone like Seema or Sandy who is actually a decision maker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
BS. Centreville currently is at the bottom or near bottom of capacities for FCPS high schools. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
NP-If they are leaving 800 seats open at WF adjacent to Centreville, there is no need for a much larger school in that part of the county. No clue if 2000 is average but there are many schols in FCPS around that size.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
“Sully” or whatever her name is now is talking out of both sides of her mouth. That’s the problem with wannabe political Facebook influencers.
On the one hand she backed the residents at Walney wanting to stay at CVHS. On the other hand she’s now posting about Westfield being under capacity and telling people to advocate to the school board to send more kids there out of cvhs.
She’s clueless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
BS. Centreville currently is at the bottom or near bottom of capacities for FCPS high schools. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
“Sully” or whatever her name is now is talking out of both sides of her mouth. That’s the problem with wannabe political Facebook influencers.
On the one hand she backed the residents at Walney wanting to stay at CVHS. On the other hand she’s now posting about Westfield being under capacity and telling people to advocate to the school board to send more kids there out of cvhs.
She’s clueless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
“Sully” or whatever her name is now is talking out of both sides of her mouth. That’s the problem with wannabe political Facebook influencers.
On the one hand she backed the residents at Walney wanting to stay at CVHS. On the other hand she’s now posting about Westfield being under capacity and telling people to advocate to the school board to send more kids there out of cvhs.
She’s clueless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Centreville holds 2000 students. That's a pretty average sized capacity for FCPS.
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts. You have your facts wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
A 2000 student building capacity is completely in the normal range for FCPS HS. There is nothing unusual about it whatsoever.
Here's Sully complaining that CVHS has "hundreds" more students than it was built for and that they are many years away from any new building. I guess she would support sending some of those kids over to the empty seats at Westfield.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2026/06/24/county-board-approves-sweeping-vision-for-mixed-use-walkable-spaces-in-centreville/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.
Centreville is below the 105% capacity that FCPS treated as a threshold for possible adjustments in the county-wide review. I say "possible adjustments" because they left at least one high school over 105% untouched.
Also, CVHS's renovation and expansion has been in the CIP for years. They can take another look at the scope, but CVHS deserves to have a building capacity in line with other schools. Not really a radical idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every neighborhood off Walney Road, and in the Walney area, should go to Westfield, not Chantilly. It is illogical not to send those kids to Westfield.
Ignoring their leaving Oakton too large, that is what would come closer to balancing enrollments at Centreville/Chantilly/Westfield.
Not really. Chantilly is moving 333 kids to Skyview and another 309 to Westfield. 639 kids. Time for Centreville to contribute something more than 77 kids, especially since the final scenario has it still at 104% capacity. Then, we can kill two birds with one stone and scale back this massive renovation/misuse of taxpayer dollars there while we are at it.
If you are so concerned about a misuse of taxpayer dollars, kill off Skyview. Otherwise shrinking a school that is already much smaller than its neighbors is about as dumb as it gets.
I think it makes sense for school enrollments to match the building size. Not really a radical idea.