Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin was the worst governor in Virginia's post-confederate history.

It's going to take Spanberger a few years to correct course. Thankfully she's off to a wonderful start.

Virginia is behind her!

Ha ha. Sure.

As taxes increase thus increasing the cost of living and crime increases across the commonwealth, we will see just how many are still behind her.

She will be used A LOT by Republicans cautioning others not to believe the Democrat candidates when they claim to be moderates.

I'm willing to pay more taxes. Why aren't you? Why are you such a selfish twat? Why do you hate the Commonwealth, America and everything they stand for?

100%

Republicans are greedy a-holes who are willing to burn it all down instead of helping others.

Just the opposite.

Epstein’s closest associates were primarily democrats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Virginia experiment (communism) will be painful to experience but just like what is happening in New York a necessary experiment to set the country back on the right track.

Right! What are need is more concentration of wealth and power at the top. It's working out so well...

The government doesn’t exist to redistribute money. And you are a fool to think the people who want more money and power in the hands of the government will share that wealth and power with you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Virginia experiment (communism) will be painful to experience but just like what is happening in New York a necessary experiment to set the country back on the right track.

Right! What are need is more concentration of wealth and power at the top. It's working out so well...

Taxing the wealthy is certain to keep them from moving to a less redistributive state. /s

Listen, the wealthy have more mobility than the poor. They aren't likely working at a 9-5 in-person job. Moving from New York and California to Texas and Florida is a thing. Even here, you can just move a few hours east to Delaware and avoid any new wealth taxes.

Anonymous wrote:The Virginia experiment (communism) will be painful to experience but just like what is happening in New York a necessary experiment to set the country back on the right track.

Right! What are need is more concentration of wealth and power at the top. It's working out so well...

The Virginia experiment (communism) will be painful to experience but just like what is happening in New York a necessary experiment to set the country back on the right track.

One look at how the school systems spend their funds, would discourage you from wanting to pay more taxes.

Looking at Fairfax--the leadership organization is huge and well paid. Student facing staff not so much.
The School Board gave themselves a raise and added additional and very well-paid assistants for themselves. Funny how most of their assistants are political activists. A quick google search will show you that.

Just a few short years ago. Board members shared assistants. Now they each have two assistants--and one of those two is extremely well paid.

This is just one example. There are many if you look.

So, do I want more taxes? No.

If the money was used wisely, I'd feel differently. They always scream that they need more money for the teachers, but then they spend it on different things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin was the worst governor in Virginia's post-confederate history.

It's going to take Spanberger a few years to correct course. Thankfully she's off to a wonderful start.

Virginia is behind her!

Ha ha. Sure.

As taxes increase thus increasing the cost of living and crime increases across the commonwealth, we will see just how many are still behind her.

She will be used A LOT by Republicans cautioning others not to believe the Democrat candidates when they claim to be moderates.

I'm willing to pay more taxes. Why aren't you? Why are you such a selfish twat? Why do you hate the Commonwealth, America and everything they stand for?

In some states, personal income tax can exceed 50%. That doesn't include the other taxes like property tax, sales tax etc. Income tax was only instituted around 100 years ago, and even then it was only a few percent. America did just fine the first couple hundred years without it. If you want to pay more taxes, you are always welcome to write a check to the US Treasury.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oof we got catfished. Thought she was moderate?

She very much is.

She NEVER said she was a moderate. Other people said that.

It’s your fault for believing them.

+1. No one should be surprised that taxes are going to go up, up, up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oof we got catfished. Thought she was moderate?

She very much is.

She NEVER said she was a moderate. Other people said that.

It’s your fault for believing them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin was the worst governor in Virginia's post-confederate history.

It's going to take Spanberger a few years to correct course. Thankfully she's off to a wonderful start.

Virginia is behind her!

Ha ha. Sure.

As taxes increase thus increasing the cost of living and crime increases across the commonwealth, we will see just how many are still behind her.

She will be used A LOT by Republicans cautioning others not to believe the Democrat candidates when they claim to be moderates.

I'm willing to pay more taxes. Why aren't you? Why are you such a selfish twat? Why do you hate the Commonwealth, America and everything they stand for?

She enters office with a budget surplus and the first thing the party wants to do is raise taxes. Why? Because that is all Dems know is to spend other people’s money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin was the worst governor in Virginia's post-confederate history.

It's going to take Spanberger a few years to correct course. Thankfully she's off to a wonderful start.

Virginia is behind her!

Ha ha. Sure.

As taxes increase thus increasing the cost of living and crime increases across the commonwealth, we will see just how many are still behind her.

She will be used A LOT by Republicans cautioning others not to believe the Democrat candidates when they claim to be moderates.

I'm willing to pay more taxes. Why aren't you? Why are you such a selfish twat? Why do you hate the Commonwealth, America and everything they stand for?

100%

Republicans are greedy a-holes who are willing to burn it all down instead of helping others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin was the worst governor in Virginia's post-confederate history.

It's going to take Spanberger a few years to correct course. Thankfully she's off to a wonderful start.

Virginia is behind her!

Ha ha. Sure.

As taxes increase thus increasing the cost of living and crime increases across the commonwealth, we will see just how many are still behind her.

She will be used A LOT by Republicans cautioning others not to believe the Democrat candidates when they claim to be moderates.

I'm willing to pay more taxes. Why aren't you? Why are you such a selfish twat? Why do you hate the Commonwealth, America and everything they stand for?

Found the astroturfer who didn’t know about Youngkin’s campaign dishonesty. This has been discussed here extensively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks Spanberger told the truth during her campaign and isn’t a progressive hasn’t done much research. Look at what’s being proposed in taxes. They even want the taxpayers to pay for housing for these state officials and have the gall to want a raise.

Seems like you're projecting.

Youngkin admitted that he LIES to get votes.

Really? Please cite the exact quote

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/562129-youngkin-says-in-video-he-cant-discuss-abortion-over-fears-of-losing/
In a clip posted online by the liberal news site the American Independent, Youngkin was asked if he would “take it to the abortionists,” to which he responded that he was “staunchly, unabashedly” anti-abortion but could not discuss the issue much ahead of the November election.

“I’m going to be really honest with you. The short answer is in this campaign, I can’t. When I’m governor and I have a majority in the House we can start going on offense. But as a campaign topic, sadly, that in fact won’t win my independent votes that I have to get,” he said.

He lied to a reporter by telling the truth? I am having difficulty following your logic.

Don’t be obtuse. He said he can’t be truthful with independents during the campaign because he needed their vote.

He said it wasn't a campaign platform. Are you suggesting that politicians are required to enumerate every single position they hold during their campaign?

He responded to the reporter with an honest answer. It's a shame the media only knows how to break into churches and stopped asking questions of our future leaders.

Republicans love shitting on that bill of rights when it serves them.

Anonymous wrote:Oof we got catfished. Thought she was moderate?

Nope! You got catfished!