Anonymous wrote:Brides paying for weddings was from the days when women did not work and the husband was responsible for all the financial load after the wedding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Explain to me why we're spending $$$$ on weddings in the first place. One of the most idiotic customs I've ever experienced.
Just because you don’t like something and you think it’s stupid doesn’t make it so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the grooms family was classy they would offer to split. Now at least you know what you're dealing with
Agreed. I think both should split it.
I plan on giving my DDs and DS the same amount of money and they can either buy a house or have a wedding with it. I took the money from my parents and bought a house at 22, got roommates who paid my entire mortgage.
If the parents' splitting, who's going to pay for the rehearsal dinner and honeymoon?
Anonymous wrote:...of the bride's parents paying for the wedding??? It's 2026.
I feel like we're going backwards.
Anonymous wrote:When my friends and I got married, the bride and groom paid for the wedding, with both sides of the family contributing. I thought only rich people did that.
Anonymous wrote:...of the bride's parents paying for the wedding??? It's 2026.
I feel like we're going backwards.
Anonymous wrote:Explain to me why we're spending $$$$ on weddings in the first place. One of the most idiotic customs I've ever experienced.