Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVSL D1-2, 200 swimmers, about 35 are club swimmers (zero 8Us are club swimmers)
Does this include minis? How many practices do you have?
Anonymous wrote:NVSL D1-2, 200 swimmers, about 35 are club swimmers (zero 8Us are club swimmers)
Anonymous wrote: Back in the day, KG was a rinky-dink starter pool, but demand has enabled that place to build itself up.
Anonymous wrote:T, O, CB Have been able to sustain success because they are large facilities with large memberships, and there is no concern of losing good swimmers. The dearth of pools in the surrounding area gives them an advantage that almost no other pool has- everyone else can pick up and travel another 5 minutes to the next closest pool for any reason. Not so in that pocket.
Their waitlists and the rabid swim culture has spread so far to make KG relevant. Back in the day, KG was a rinky-dink starter pool, but demand has enabled that place to build itself up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing a lot of posts where the size of a team matters. Where I’m from (large city, very large swim league, more teams than NVSL and MCSL), divisions are based on size of team and location. I’m not defending that approach, but it makes me wonder what size most of the teams are and whether this approach actually holds up in our leagues.
For kicks and giggles, can you share which league and division your team is in and how many swimmers you have on your team?
My team is NVSL Division 2 and we have about 200-215 that are eligible to swim in B meets (ie, not “pre-team” swimmers).
Nobody cares about the Atlanta league. If you like the NVSL, that league sucks.
I’m from Texas
Per SwimTopia this summer, the only league that has more teams than NVSL is the Atlanta league.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing a lot of posts where the size of a team matters. Where I’m from (large city, very large swim league, more teams than NVSL and MCSL), divisions are based on size of team and location. I’m not defending that approach, but it makes me wonder what size most of the teams are and whether this approach actually holds up in our leagues.
For kicks and giggles, can you share which league and division your team is in and how many swimmers you have on your team?
My team is NVSL Division 2 and we have about 200-215 that are eligible to swim in B meets (ie, not “pre-team” swimmers).
Nobody cares about the Atlanta league. If you like the NVSL, that league sucks.
I’m from Texas
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing a lot of posts where the size of a team matters. Where I’m from (large city, very large swim league, more teams than NVSL and MCSL), divisions are based on size of team and location. I’m not defending that approach, but it makes me wonder what size most of the teams are and whether this approach actually holds up in our leagues.
For kicks and giggles, can you share which league and division your team is in and how many swimmers you have on your team?
My team is NVSL Division 2 and we have about 200-215 that are eligible to swim in B meets (ie, not “pre-team” swimmers).
Nobody cares about the Atlanta league. If you like the NVSL, that league sucks.
I’m from Texas
lol NVSL people have a weird insecurity thing about the Atlanta summer league.