Anonymous wrote:It's competitive at our team. But we have had the same summer coach for a decade so they know almost all the kids coming up who apply. The coach makes the decisions. It's his employees and his team.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like you go to our pool! I don’t think kids should be laid to give feedback to their peers. At some point you could just have team captains like HS swim and not pay anyone under 21 that was ever part of the team!
At our pool, they are cheap and like the nepo coaches even if they are terrible. Like on their phone, filming and laughing at swimmers. Sitting on each other’s laps, throwing basketballs and tennis balls over the heads of swimmers, flirting with each other, walking AWAY from the pool as serious injuries occur, kicking swimmers, etc. Our team continues to PAY assistant and junior coaches to be this inappropriate and dangerous!
My oldest only has a couple of years left, but will prioritize their club team this year. My youngest asked to quit because it was so bad.
Anonymous wrote:The best hiring process I have heard of is at a pool where they make a hiring committee out of the following roles:
Team reps
Head referee
Pool board treasurer
Data Coordinator
The reason that I like this structure is that it doesn’t put all the power into just the team reps (which is especially problematic if they are married, which at some pools they are and many others they aren’t). It also doesn’t allow the team reps to hand select a “committee” who will vote however they want. It allows 5 individuals who all commit a lot of volunteer hours to work together to make decisions.
In my opinion these hiring decisions should apply for hiring and re-hiring the head and assistant coaches as well as the junior coaches.
The process should also be transparent.
That said, children of the people who volunteer the most should absolutely be allowed to be hired if they are qualified!
Also as an aside, while being able to swim fast shouldn’t be a criteria for hiring, I do think understanding how to technically improve people’s swimming should be. We aren’t actually hiring babysitters but swim coaches.
I’ve seen many junior coaches who have no clue how to coach swimming actually make swimming harder for the kids they are “coaching”.
Anonymous wrote:The truth is that the people who run the swim team's kids get those jobs. If there are additional positions available after the nepo hires, your kid has a decent shot if s/he volunteered for free the previous season.
Anonymous wrote:The best hiring process I have heard of is at a pool where they make a hiring committee out of the following roles:
Team reps
Head referee
Pool board treasurer
Data Coordinator
The reason that I like this structure is that it doesn’t put all the power into just the team reps (which is especially problematic if they are married, which at some pools they are and many others they aren’t). It also doesn’t allow the team reps to hand select a “committee” who will vote however they want. It allows 5 individuals who all commit a lot of volunteer hours to work together to make decisions.
In my opinion these hiring decisions should apply for hiring and re-hiring the head and assistant coaches as well as the junior coaches.
The process should also be transparent.
That said, children of the people who volunteer the most should absolutely be allowed to be hired if they are qualified!
Also as an aside, while being able to swim fast shouldn’t be a criteria for hiring, I do think understanding how to technically improve people’s swimming should be. We aren’t actually hiring babysitters but swim coaches.
I’ve seen many junior coaches who have no clue how to coach swimming actually make swimming harder for the kids they are “coaching”.