Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

I see that as an example of responsible reporting because Iranian state media is known for lying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I'm naive here, but I don't see CNN being wrecked by Bari Weiss as much as CBS has been. People would notice if they suddenly banned Daniel Dale from fact-checking Trump.

ZNN already has the two most zionist news personalities along with a whole lineup of zionist analysts, so it's not like they need to change very much. Some, including a random anchor, were openly smiling when they were discussing events on the first day of bombing Iran.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN was not reporting the news in the past. It was massaging the news to fit its agenda.

Anyone remember the kid visiting D.C. who was getting harassed by a drum-beating old man? The media portrayed the kid as a MAGA jerk who was mistreating the elderly man. The man belonged to a minority. The media screamed about the insufferable kid. They showed photos. Some of them even showed little cuts of video to back their giant headline news.

And then the full video came out. The truth was in direct contrast to what the media was telling the American public and the world. The old man was the one doing the harassing, and the kid was just a kid trying to deal with a nasty old man.

How soon we forget. Some of you don't care about the truth. You care when the media won't massage the news to fit your agenda. Some of you are just trolls trying to stir the pot.

The media went off the rails a long time ago. As I understand it, the current head of CNN is trying to bring back impartial news. We'll see.

This is your counter argument to the case of 150 children being killed in a missile strike?

Anonymous wrote:CNN was not reporting the news in the past. It was massaging the news to fit its agenda.

Anyone remember the kid visiting D.C. who was getting harassed by a drum-beating old man? The media portrayed the kid as a MAGA jerk who was mistreating the elderly man. The man belonged to a minority. The media screamed about the insufferable kid. They showed photos. Some of them even showed little cuts of video to back their giant headline news.

And then the full video came out. The truth was in direct contrast to what the media was telling the American public and the world. The old man was the one doing the harassing, and the kid was just a kid trying to deal with a nasty old man.

How soon we forget. Some of you don't care about the truth. You care when the media won't massage the news to fit your agenda. Some of you are just trolls trying to stir the pot.

The media went off the rails a long time ago. As I understand it, the current head of CNN is trying to bring back impartial news. We'll see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

Cherry-picking is stupid



"Thousands of mourners filled the streets of a town in southern Iran on Tuesday during the funeral for victims of an airstrike on a girls’ elementary school, according to footage and images verified by The New York Times. The strike ranks among the deadliest attacks of the American-Israeli campaign against Iran."

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

I see that as an example of responsible reporting because Iranian state media is known for lying.

And Israeli media is a paragon of truth? 🤣 Everything coming out of all 3 regimes involved should be viewed as possible lies and propaganda until it can be confirmed. The truth has to be pieced together from multiple sources, because NONE of them can be trusted.

US turns the guns inward. That’s how you know US is the problem

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

Western media has been doing this for decades. When Palestinians are killed they use word like “allegedly” and “per Hamas health ministry” to cast doubts on the facts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

I see that as an example of responsible reporting because Iranian state media is known for lying.

And Israeli media is a paragon of truth? 🤣 Everything coming out of all 3 regimes involved should be viewed as possible lies and propaganda until it can be confirmed. The truth has to be pieced together from multiple sources, because NONE of them can be trusted.

I don’t know why that’s funny. There’s more ways to verify information in countries where there isn’t a total internet blackout. Do you have information to the contrary on 9 people being killed in an Iranian strike on Israel? It’s been widely reported and very likely to have been independently verified.

BS. Our media frequently equivocates even when what happened is abundantly clear. This is bias, not a question of facts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

I see that as an example of responsible reporting because Iranian state media is known for lying.

Might want to check how many times Israel has been caught red handed lying in the past 3 years. Here's just a few of the lies I found:

"Beheaded babies" — IDF said "assume it happened" without confirmation. IDF itself could not confirm; subsequent investigations found no evidence.
Humanitarian aid video — Posted video claiming to show aid provided to Gaza. Video was actually footage from a Moldova refugee camp in 2022; deleted after exposure.
Hamas stealing aid — Repeatedly accused Hamas of stealing humanitarian aid. USAID confirmed July 2025 it found no evidence Hamas stole any aid.
Civilian-to-combatant ratio — Netanyahu claimed 1:1 ratio, "lowest in history of modern urban warfare." Leaked internal military report August 2025 showed 80%+ of those killed were civilians.
Fighter kill counts — Claimed 20,000 fighters killed (Nov 2023). Own figures changed to 7,860, then 17,000, then 14,000 within 12 months.
Al-Ahli Hospital explosion — Immediately blamed Hamas rocket misfire. Attribution made before any evidence gathered; widely disputed by independent investigators.
Food distribution site killings — Claimed "chaos" posed immediate threat to soldiers. 1,000+ civilians killed at sites per Euro-Med Monitor and retired US special forces officer.
Rafah massacre — lights off — Claimed ambulances had no headlights or emergency signals. Video from victim's own phone clearly showed lights on; IDF acknowledged claim was "mistaken."
Rafah massacre — hands tied — IDF rejected claims any medic's hands were tied. Red Crescent confirmed one body recovered with hands and feet bound; IDF never explained the discrepancy.
— burial coordination — Claimed bodies were buried to preserve them and UN was informed. IDF blocked Red Crescent, OCHA, and UN access for a full week; own investigation found report "lacked accuracy and completeness."
— no cover-up — Claimed no attempt to hide the incident. Golani Brigade deputy commander removed specifically for delivering an inaccurate report.

You’re welcome to not believe it, but to pretend like something can’t be independently verified in Israel is just dumb. Also, where does it say the IDF reported this? There are videos online of bombs falling from the sky, and some breaking through and exploding in Israel. Bibi and the IDF report a lot of what is obviously horseshit. This is just thing that happened, and retaliatory bombs during a war is logical. “Bombs fell, people died” is not a fantastical story line.

IDF were killing journalist left and right. The only journalist allowed were state approved journalist who were reporting favorably for Israel. All others were murdered.

Anonymous wrote:Many of those who are at the top of the media heiarchy are part of the Epstein class. We obviously know where their alliegences are.

Anonymous wrote:Republicans now control most of our media so it's all propaganda now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they are designed to promote the Zionists agenda

I see that as an example of responsible reporting because Iranian state media is known for lying.

And Israeli media is a paragon of truth? 🤣 Everything coming out of all 3 regimes involved should be viewed as possible lies and propaganda until it can be confirmed. The truth has to be pieced together from multiple sources, because NONE of them can be trusted.

I don’t know why that’s funny. There’s more ways to verify information in countries where there isn’t a total internet blackout. Do you have information to the contrary on 9 people being killed in an Iranian strike on Israel? It’s been widely reported and very likely to have been independently verified.