Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow trading with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
So tone deaf. $100 invested in VTC isn’t going to replace lost income and benefits of a job.
$100 invested by a high school student with a part-time job, every month for 50 years until eligibility for Social Security would grow to nearly $1.8M at the historic market long-term return of 10%. Invest a little more each month as earnings grow and the ending balance which be much larger, much sooner. Tone deaf, or merely aware of the basic mathematics of compounding?
Okay? They will be 70 then, what is your point? We are talking about ages when losing your job matters.
The point, very obviously, is that taking responsibility for your financial future, whatever it holds, is within anyone's grasp. it is not dependent upon very high earnings, consistent employment, inherited wealth, or winning the lottery. Those who spend everything they bring in are ill-prepared for life's ups and downs; time and discipline are all that is needed to be able to "do well" no matter what. Anyone claiming otherwise is short-sighted and undereducated about personal finance.
In the example provided, the amounts invested are laughably small, appropriate for a high schooler with a part-time job. Any adult should be able to do much better, resulting in much more saved in their 30s, 40s, and beyond. By mid-career they should have plenty in reserve to weather economic cycles even if faced with a period of unemployment, especially if they have worked hard and built a resume which makes them a desirable employee and not just someone killing time collecting a paycheck in return for minimum effort.
Losing a job is no joke, but it need not be a disaster for those who prepared for the possibility. It becomes a speed bump, not a complete derailment.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/block-laying-off-about-4000-employees-nearly-half-of-its-workforce.html
I have mixed feelings when the market is doing well while people are losing their jobs
I probably have shares of this company or ones like it that cut people to prop up their stock price.
On one hand we complain about companies laying off people, but we sure do like it when stock prices go up.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/block-laying-off-about-4000-employees-nearly-half-of-its-workforce.html
I have mixed feelings when the market is doing well while people are losing their jobs
I probably have shares of this company or ones like it that cut people to prop up their stock price.
On one hand we complain about companies laying off people, but we sure do like it when stock prices go up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow trading with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
So tone deaf. $100 invested in VTC isn’t going to replace lost income and benefits of a job.
$100 invested by a high school student with a part-time job, every month for 50 years until eligibility for Social Security would grow to nearly $1.8M at the historic market long-term return of 10%. Invest a little more each month as earnings grow and the ending balance which be much larger, much sooner. Tone deaf, or merely aware of the basic mathematics of compounding?
Okay? They will be 70 then, what is your point? We are talking about ages when losing your job matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow trading with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
So tone deaf. $100 invested in VTC isn’t going to replace lost income and benefits of a job.
$100 invested by a high school student with a part-time job, every month for 50 years until eligibility for Social Security would grow to nearly $1.8M at the historic market long-term return of 10%. Invest a little more each month as earnings grow and the ending balance which be much larger, much sooner. Tone deaf, or merely aware of the basic mathematics of compounding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow trading with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
So tone deaf. $100 invested in VTC isn’t going to replace lost income and benefits of a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow tradiing with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
For all your money, you are very, very sheltered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it's a terrible thing to say, but for the sake of new and younger investors we need a sustained correction in this market.
Don't blame corporations. Our greed is to blame. There used to be a time when a 7% return was amazing. Heck even a 5% is nothing to looked down upon.
Now forget it. People are making assumptions of yearly 10%+ return year after it's not sustainable.
Unfortunately this greed doesn't end in finance..we see it everywhere. We want bigger and faster athletes. We want more home runs. We want bigger homes.
We want more more more.
We will pay a steep price for this greed.
The greed is driven by fear.
No one wants to be the ones left behind in a game that increasingly results in winner-take-all, so they do their best to be the ones at the top of the K.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow tradiing with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow trading with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.
???
You seem absolutely awful.
Jealous of attitudes and actual actions which lead to financial success instead of envy? We all have opportunities, large and small, but only some take advantage of them.
DP. I also own stocks and have enjoyed nice gains over the past few years, but don’t you worry at all about the future of this country? We can’t all just make our living off of stocks; the economy would not work. And it takes all kinds; you would do well to take interest in the workers who make your stocks worth anything.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/block-laying-off-about-4000-employees-nearly-half-of-its-workforce.html
I have mixed feelings when the market is doing well while people are losing their jobs
I probably have shares of this company or ones like it that cut people to prop up their stock price.
On one hand we complain about companies laying off people, but we sure do like it when stock prices go up.
Anonymous wrote:I know it's a terrible thing to say, but for the sake of new and younger investors we need a sustained correction in this market.
Don't blame corporations. Our greed is to blame. There used to be a time when a 7% return was amazing. Heck even a 5% is nothing to looked down upon.
Now forget it. People are making assumptions of yearly 10%+ return year after it's not sustainable.
Unfortunately this greed doesn't end in finance..we see it everywhere. We want bigger and faster athletes. We want more home runs. We want bigger homes.
We want more more more.
We will pay a steep price for this greed.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing prevents anyone from owning stock and from participating in the fortunes of the companies whose shares they buy. No reason to sympathize with people who choose not to be investors. You can open a brokerage account at some firms with $0, and some require maintaining a balance of only $100 or more. Many brokers allow tradiing with very small amounts, regardless of the minimum opening balance.
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow. Sow nothing, reap nothing.