Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe there will be fewer murders and school shooting once they start invading people’s homes and want to do it safely and without getting shot at. If they kill the second amendment it might be the one decent thing that they do.
What the F is actually wrong with you? Do you want to live in an authoritarian country? We have freedoms enumerated by our constitution and those rights are what protect us from government overreach. Giving them the kind of power you're stupidly talking about ceding is exactly how that power gets turned against innocent but marginalized people. You are the German citizens that paved the way for the Nazis and their genocide.
I don’t think that you read the last line of what I wrote. It’s all terrible, but if they were to finally admit that the second amendment isn’t about tyranny, or government overreach, or whatever BS they’ve had us believing, whatever. We’ve been killing each other for decades in the name of some greater good that clearly does actually exist in real life.
If this isn’t the exact time that people should be thinking about second amendment rights then it’s stupid, anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe there will be fewer murders and school shooting once they start invading people’s homes and want to do it safely and without getting shot at. If they kill the second amendment it might be the one decent thing that they do.
What the F is actually wrong with you? Do you want to live in an authoritarian country? We have freedoms enumerated by our constitution and those rights are what protect us from government overreach. Giving them the kind of power you're stupidly talking about ceding is exactly how that power gets turned against innocent but marginalized people. You are the German citizens that paved the way for the Nazis and their genocide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
I’m actually curious how this would play out in a court. Let’s say a door gets kicked down these guys come rushing in, the homeowner has an A.R. 15 and defends himself or herself and kills the agents. The agents have no warrant, and the homeowner ends up being a person in the country legally.
Is the government going to try to then say the people no longer have the right to defend their homes?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe there will be fewer murders and school shooting once they start invading people’s homes and want to do it safely and without getting shot at. If they kill the second amendment it might be the one decent thing that they do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
Then what do you say about the people who presented themselves at the border and didn't cross illegally? What do you say about the green card holders who are here legally?
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe there will be fewer murders and school shooting once they start invading people’s homes and want to do it safely and without getting shot at. If they kill the second amendment it might be the one decent thing that they do.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
]Anonymous wrote:if Dems ever gain control of Congress, they better systematically impeach wide swaths of appointees, and criminally charge others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
I’m actually curious how this would play out in a court. Let’s say a door gets kicked down these guys come rushing in, the homeowner has an A.R. 15 and defends himself or herself and kills the agents. The agents have no warrant, and the homeowner ends up being a person in the country legally.
Is the government going to try to then say the people no longer have the right to defend their homes?
Assuming they don’t mow him down, I am certain they would call him a domestic terrorist and try to charge him with murder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
I’m actually curious how this would play out in a court. Let’s say a door gets kicked down these guys come rushing in, the homeowner has an A.R. 15 and defends himself or herself and kills the agents. The agents have no warrant, and the homeowner ends up being a person in the country legally.
Is the government going to try to then say the people no longer have the right to defend their homes?