Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good points, but I wouldn't necessarily rank good suburban schools quite that high - the mean SAT at Staples High School in Westport e.g. is 1260, which is like 40 points lower than LaGuardia's and 100 points lower than ElRo's. (most of their matriculation lists are pretty bleak too)

LaGuardia incidentally is an interesting option missing from that list - it's not a pressure cooker, but it's certainly academically equivalent to a good suburban school, and if your kid already has some aptitude in music or singing or acting or dance, pursuing that more seriously in middle school and working with an audition coach could easily get them to LaGuardia level. We know a bunch of kids who went that route and had a marvelous experience.

SHSATs I wouldn't say are all pressure cookers - Stuy certainly is, but Bronx Science less so and Brooklyn Latin/Tech less still. You're not wrong about Gen Ed, but if your kid is a strong writer they might be able to overcome a bad lottery number with a good essay - we know kids who've managed that.

You don't look at averages when looking at suburban publics. You look at volume. Really good suburban publics are getting a bunch of kids into top schools. By nature they have to handle whoever walks in the door so there will also be a cohort of much weaker kids. But usually they have good tracking so can accelerate top kids while also supporting less academic kids. Of course, there are some suburban publics which are pressure cookers - some schools I wouldn't send my kid to.

Bronx Sci is definitely more sane than Stuy but still huge, remote and a pressure cooker. Brooklyn Tech is gigantic so not for everyone. Brooklyn Latin was freaky and it has a very odd curriculum - works for some but not others - we were a hard pass (my kid far exceeded the threshold).

Not many essay schools I would consider. And the rubric for that is odd - I wouldn't rest my hopes on it. Though I do agree that it broadens the potential options as there are some that are OK.

We went through the process last year and this is spot on. For a non-spec ed kid the non-SHSAT options were not amazing unless you had fabulous luck with the lottery number (we did not), the kid was artsy (there are a number of performing arts schools besides LaGuardia), or you happened to randomly crack the code for Beacon, Bard, or NEST. As far as I could tell from who got into those essay schools, it wasn't much tied to a kid's writing abilities (plus the essays were written at home, so, yeah). My kid wound up at one of the "big 3" SHSATs and while very happy there, I can tell it's going to be a doozy for college admissions. Anyway, I certainly think private is worth the $ for high school, and maybe for middle school, just to avoid the 8th grade scramble. Elementary, not so much.

Agree with all of this. And even the essay schools have their pros and cons. We loved NEST but it is remote (not the end of the world). Bard is great for artsy humanities kids - a kid who would excel at a traditional private school probably wouldn't be happy there so it isn't a binary choice (though there are obviously less traditional private schools).

We've generally heard good things about Beacon - they had an awful interim principal for a year or so and I have heard the new one is much better, but it still has its limitations - as much as regents are a pain, the other method they have (blanking on the name) is not appropriate for some subjects and kids find it very frustrating - a friend's child was actually begging to just have to take tests rather than do another pointless project.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good points, but I wouldn't necessarily rank good suburban schools quite that high - the mean SAT at Staples High School in Westport e.g. is 1260, which is like 40 points lower than LaGuardia's and 100 points lower than ElRo's. (most of their matriculation lists are pretty bleak too)

LaGuardia incidentally is an interesting option missing from that list - it's not a pressure cooker, but it's certainly academically equivalent to a good suburban school, and if your kid already has some aptitude in music or singing or acting or dance, pursuing that more seriously in middle school and working with an audition coach could easily get them to LaGuardia level. We know a bunch of kids who went that route and had a marvelous experience.

SHSATs I wouldn't say are all pressure cookers - Stuy certainly is, but Bronx Science less so and Brooklyn Latin/Tech less still. You're not wrong about Gen Ed, but if your kid is a strong writer they might be able to overcome a bad lottery number with a good essay - we know kids who've managed that.

You don't look at averages when looking at suburban publics. You look at volume. Really good suburban publics are getting a bunch of kids into top schools. By nature they have to handle whoever walks in the door so there will also be a cohort of much weaker kids. But usually they have good tracking so can accelerate top kids while also supporting less academic kids. Of course, there are some suburban publics which are pressure cookers - some schools I wouldn't send my kid to.

Bronx Sci is definitely more sane than Stuy but still huge, remote and a pressure cooker. Brooklyn Tech is gigantic so not for everyone. Brooklyn Latin was freaky and it has a very odd curriculum - works for some but not others - we were a hard pass (my kid far exceeded the threshold).

Not many essay schools I would consider. And the rubric for that is odd - I wouldn't rest my hopes on it. Though I do agree that it broadens the potential options as there are some that are OK.

We went through the process last year and this is spot on. For a non-spec ed kid the non-SHSAT options were not amazing unless you had fabulous luck with the lottery number (we did not), the kid was artsy (there are a number of performing arts schools besides LaGuardia), or you happened to randomly crack the code for Beacon, Bard, or NEST. As far as I could tell from who got into those essay schools, it wasn't much tied to a kid's writing abilities (plus the essays were written at home, so, yeah). My kid wound up at one of the "big 3" SHSATs and while very happy there, I can tell it's going to be a doozy for college admissions. Anyway, I certainly think private is worth the $ for high school, and maybe for middle school, just to avoid the 8th grade scramble. Elementary, not so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good points, but I wouldn't necessarily rank good suburban schools quite that high - the mean SAT at Staples High School in Westport e.g. is 1260, which is like 40 points lower than LaGuardia's and 100 points lower than ElRo's. (most of their matriculation lists are pretty bleak too)

LaGuardia incidentally is an interesting option missing from that list - it's not a pressure cooker, but it's certainly academically equivalent to a good suburban school, and if your kid already has some aptitude in music or singing or acting or dance, pursuing that more seriously in middle school and working with an audition coach could easily get them to LaGuardia level. We know a bunch of kids who went that route and had a marvelous experience.

SHSATs I wouldn't say are all pressure cookers - Stuy certainly is, but Bronx Science less so and Brooklyn Latin/Tech less still. You're not wrong about Gen Ed, but if your kid is a strong writer they might be able to overcome a bad lottery number with a good essay - we know kids who've managed that.

You don't look at averages when looking at suburban publics. You look at volume. Really good suburban publics are getting a bunch of kids into top schools. By nature they have to handle whoever walks in the door so there will also be a cohort of much weaker kids. But usually they have good tracking so can accelerate top kids while also supporting less academic kids. Of course, there are some suburban publics which are pressure cookers - some schools I wouldn't send my kid to.

Bronx Sci is definitely more sane than Stuy but still huge, remote and a pressure cooker. Brooklyn Tech is gigantic so not for everyone. Brooklyn Latin was freaky and it has a very odd curriculum - works for some but not others - we were a hard pass (my kid far exceeded the threshold).

Not many essay schools I would consider. And the rubric for that is odd - I wouldn't rest my hopes on it. Though I do agree that it broadens the potential options as there are some that are OK.

We went through the process last year and this is spot on. For a non-spec ed kid the non-SHSAT options were not amazing unless you had fabulous luck with the lottery number (we did not), the kid was artsy (there are a number of performing arts schools besides LaGuardia), or you happened to randomly crack the code for Beacon, Bard, or NEST. As far as I could tell from who got into those essay schools, it wasn't much tied to a kid's writing abilities (plus the essays were written at home, so, yeah). My kid wound up at one of the "big 3" SHSATs and while very happy there, I can tell it's going to be a doozy for college admissions. Anyway, I certainly think private is worth the $ for high school, and maybe for middle school, just to avoid the 8th grade scramble. Elementary, not so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good points, but I wouldn't necessarily rank good suburban schools quite that high - the mean SAT at Staples High School in Westport e.g. is 1260, which is like 40 points lower than LaGuardia's and 100 points lower than ElRo's. (most of their matriculation lists are pretty bleak too)

LaGuardia incidentally is an interesting option missing from that list - it's not a pressure cooker, but it's certainly academically equivalent to a good suburban school, and if your kid already has some aptitude in music or singing or acting or dance, pursuing that more seriously in middle school and working with an audition coach could easily get them to LaGuardia level. We know a bunch of kids who went that route and had a marvelous experience.

SHSATs I wouldn't say are all pressure cookers - Stuy certainly is, but Bronx Science less so and Brooklyn Latin/Tech less still. You're not wrong about Gen Ed, but if your kid is a strong writer they might be able to overcome a bad lottery number with a good essay - we know kids who've managed that.

You don't look at averages when looking at suburban publics. You look at volume. Really good suburban publics are getting a bunch of kids into top schools. By nature they have to handle whoever walks in the door so there will also be a cohort of much weaker kids. But usually they have good tracking so can accelerate top kids while also supporting less academic kids. Of course, there are some suburban publics which are pressure cookers - some schools I wouldn't send my kid to.

Bronx Sci is definitely more sane than Stuy but still huge, remote and a pressure cooker. Brooklyn Tech is gigantic so not for everyone. Brooklyn Latin was freaky and it has a very odd curriculum - works for some but not others - we were a hard pass (my kid far exceeded the threshold).

Not many essay schools I would consider. And the rubric for that is odd - I wouldn't rest my hopes on it. Though I do agree that it broadens the potential options as there are some that are OK.

Anonymous wrote:I know there’s a lot of Manhattan students at Packer in the upper school. VCS is very underwhelming from things I’ve heard.

Anonymous wrote:I would LOVE to do 234 but my kid is a fall birthday and we wont be in public past fifth grade...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that there isn't the equivalent of a really good suburban public high school. Options for HS are:

1) SHSAT schools which are pressure cookers, big classes, lots of FGLI kids who study 24/7. Generally big schools (except HSMSE which is too small).
2) Top Gen Ed public schools. Not many of them. Big classes. Need a top lottery number to get something like ElRo. Most of them have at least one major gap. Worried about your life being at the whim of the unpredictable DOE.
3) TT schools. Pressure cookers. If you are not off the chart smart or connected you will just be some person struggling to pay tuition and they might not go to bat for you for TT colleges.
4) Next tier privates. Top kids get into top schools but often they are hooked. More meh kids mixed in so have to block out the noise. Still a huge expense.

For elementary and middle the public options can be better so often worth saving your money, though locking in the private earlier cuts down on stress in 8th grade. But if money is or could be an issue, saving all those years of private could be a game changer.

Not sure what the answer is.

Brooklyn Heights-er back. I think the option I was thinking of was pubic for k-5 (or k-8) and then move to private. I literally don't know a single person who wanted Packer who didn't get Packer. Not hooked, unless you consider full pay a hook. But let's say, I raised kids through some weird times - covid, etc. Spots opened up. Okay, but there's Grace or similar T2 schools. Not sure if this is the #4 choice on your list and it's certainly expensive but a lot less than private for k-12 which is what the OP is considering. You won't get a better education than 234, I really think that. My kids did k-5 at PS8 and I was never even a tiny bit envious of the work the kids at Packer were doing - and my kids had plenty of friends in all the local privates. But the convenience of the kids moving from school to the playgroundor to a friends house - or being able to text a friend to see if they/their nanny could help pick up a kid etc. It's just a blessing in those years.

Anonymous wrote:I know there’s a lot of Manhattan students at Packer in the upper school. VCS is very underwhelming from things I’ve heard.

Anonymous wrote:Packer has debt rated by Moody's so has to publicly disclose a lot of information, which is quite interesting. Data is school wide so it is hard to parse out what grades they are referring to, but overall they reject a lot more kids than they accept, then have a pretty strong yield on those who are accepted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Brooklyn Heights-er back. I think the option I was thinking of was pubic for k-5 (or k-8) and then move to private. I literally don't know a single person who wanted Packer who didn't get Packer. Not hooked, unless you consider full pay a hook. But let's say, I raised kids through some weird times - covid, etc. Spots opened up. Okay, but there's Grace or similar T2 schools. Not sure if this is the #4 choice on your list and it's certainly expensive but a lot less than private for k-12 which is what the OP is considering. You won't get a better education than 234, I really think that. My kids did k-5 at PS8 and I was never even a tiny bit envious of the work the kids at Packer were doing - and my kids had plenty of friends in all the local privates. But the convenience of the kids moving from school to the playgroundor to a friends house - or being able to text a friend to see if they/their nanny could help pick up a kid etc. It's just a blessing in those years.

I don't think you're correct about Packer admissions. I think they get many more applicants than they have seats. We went to a lot of open houses last fall and Packer's definitely was the most zoo like, and they closed RSVPs early. It's also not easy to get an interview slot at Packer. I think Packer has become much more popular over the past 10 or 15 years. We know many kids that have Packer on their lists this admission cycle and not all will get in. At least in the HS, Packer has man unique programs imo.

I still have kids in high school so quite familiar with admissions trends up through last 5 years, and I agree that it's tough for K admissions. I do know people who went get in for K. But I don't know anyone who didn't get in later. It helps if you tour and apply and even if you're not accepted just keep you file in play. Call over there in fall and then late in the year about off-cycle admissions. That helps. If not then, in high school. And once one kid is in, they all get in.