Anonymous wrote:Whatever you choose, try to choose a smaller, less rigorous school. It’s easier to shine and rise to the top there, and stand out as “one of the best” in the teacher rec forms. Do not seek out the most prestigious, rigorous high schools!!!
Anonymous wrote:Depends on major and narrative.
If non-Stem and humanities or social sciences with strong app narrative, private school gets you there much easier.
Anonymous wrote:Depends on major and narrative.
If non-Stem and humanities or social sciences with strong app narrative, private school gets you there much easier.
Anonymous wrote:Public or private doesn't matter.
You don't want a super high performing school with a high proportion of strivers.
You want a regular, decent school with a normal amount of opportunities/activities and fairly good teachers and lots of APs offered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For an unhooked UMC smart kid?
We are trying to decide if we should switch our bright child to private school.
Depending on the kid and the school.
Generally speaking, for a smart unhooked kid but not ultra competitive, it's easier to get into non-ivy T20 or T10 lacs from a feeder private school.
For an ultra competitive kid, it's much easier to get in ivies and T5 from a really good public school.
If you can afford private you are likely not FGLI or URM, so you will eclipsed at most private school for competitive colleges. They are only taking so many kids from any given school district, and in public that is who get the slots — they know your life will be fine at Wake or Vandy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For an unhooked UMC smart kid?
We are trying to decide if we should switch our bright child to private school.
Depending on the kid and the school.
Generally speaking, for a smart unhooked kid but not ultra competitive, it's easier to get into non-ivy T20 or T10 lacs from a feeder private school.
For an ultra competitive kid, it's much easier to get in ivies and T5 from a really good public school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For an unhooked UMC smart kid?
We are trying to decide if we should switch our bright child to private school.
Depending on the kid and the school.
Generally speaking, for a smart unhooked kid but not ultra competitive, it's easier to get into non-ivy T20 or T10 lacs from a feeder private school.
For an ultra competitive kid, it's much easier to get in ivies and T5 from a really good public school.
Actually, it's exactly the REVERSE.
If you are ultra competitive from Sidwell, STA, NCS (i.e. you're top 5 in the class) you can almost guarantee a top5 school. I hate to say 100% but it's pretty close to 100%
I don't think you can say the same about publics.
Op here. I have seen some smart kids NOT get into ivy despite being double legacies and attending one of these privates. I assume they weren’t top students at their private.
I know people will say don’t pick private for college outcomes. We will be pissed if we spend 500k for our kid to end up at a college that could have been admitted from a public high.
We have a seven figure income and can pay for private but we aren’t rich rich. We are working rich.