Anonymous wrote:ruly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.
Pretty much everyone I know would judge the cheater. You clearly hang out with people with low morals like yours.
jjAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.
Extremely ironic take given the news about Sherrone Moore right now. Major sports commentators all seem to agree that his football career is over due to his cheating (exacerbated further by his breakdown) and his reputation has most definitely been harmed.
I'm sure you are a cheater who wants to believe that people don't really care, but the truth is that many people actually do.
He wasn't in trouble for cheating, it was for having an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate.
Anonymous wrote:Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.
Extremely ironic take given the news about Sherrone Moore right now. Major sports commentators all seem to agree that his football career is over due to his cheating (exacerbated further by his breakdown) and his reputation has most definitely been harmed.
I'm sure you are a cheater who wants to believe that people don't really care, but the truth is that many people actually do.
Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.
ruly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.Anonymous wrote:I am hoping to settle out of court and he does have a reputation to lose..
That depends on who he cheated with. Remember the Coldplay couple? If your affair would be damaging to your company, people care.
Anonymous wrote:Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.Anonymous wrote:I am hoping to settle out of court and he does have a reputation to lose..
Truly NO ONE cares about infidelity anymore. It's not reputation-harming. It's 2025. Fifty years ago? Sure. Today? It's good gossip and that's it. No one wears a scarlet A anymore.Anonymous wrote:I am hoping to settle out of court and he does have a reputation to lose..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is not how it works. Cheating has no impact on division of marital assets.
This is asking about settlement, not what’s judge is likely to do (the law).
To answer the OP: it depends entirely on the psychology of the cheater. I am not far enough down this road to speak from personal experience yet but I know of a couple settlements where yes this happened because the cheater wanted to get out quick etc.
The issue many people run into however is that the cheater uses divorce or mediation as simply another form of abuse.
Thankfully, I guess, my cheater felt really guilty. He had cheated when the kids were little and I forgave him. I developed a chronic illness from having our kids. He had another affair (emotional, so he says) and knew he'd already blown his one get out of jail free card. He actually said that to me . . . how it was so sad that he was trapped and could never betray me again. But it was ok the one time? Um OK. I said, duh you are not trapped. I don't want to be with someone who doesn't want to be with me.
So he offered me a good settlement. Offered me lifetime alimony, and even agreed to forgo the usual cohabitation clause. Claims he gave me more than half of the assets but that's dependent on his valuing different rental properties and businesses. I just wanted my half and I'm confident it was at least close.
I understand that I am extremely fortunate in how this all turned out. But I also refuse to get too excited about him doing the right thing in this one area when he failed in all the others. Our friends and family are generally good people and are utterly horrified by his actions. He would have been a total pariah if he'd tried to screw me financially too.