Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Why are you, from England? We are not talking about grad school rankings.

Both Brown and Dartmouth are far superior for undergrad. You may disagree; but applicants don’t. 80% choose Brown over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
72% choose Dartmouth over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
Stop digging your hole.

not to add fuel to this fire but Williams does trounce JHU in terms of x admits also..

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Johns+Hopkins+University&with=Williams+College

Parchment is not a reliable source and is based on insufficient input to make any reasonably supportable statements.

Nevertheless, if one was admitted to both Williams College and to JHU, I do understand the appeal of attending the #1 ranked LAC over a school that just recently made it into the top 10 National University ranking. Also, these are very different school environments. Williams is in a safe community with only a modestly competitive student environment whereas the environment for pre-med majors at JHU is quite intense & competitive. But, they are still playing in different leagues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Williams would 1000% - and probably higher than JHU, which some would say is a one trick pony

Now you're just be silly & childish. Compare the research budget of JHU to any other school in the world. JHU's 2023 fiscal year research budget was over $3.8 billion ($3,800,000,000+). Over $3.8 billion for just one year. Williams College's R&D budget for the same fiscal year (2023) was a paltry $3.448 million (less than one-tenth of one percent of JHU's 2023 R&D budget!)

JHU's $3,800,000,000+ budget versus Williams College's $3,448,000 R&D budget. They are in two different leagues.

Endowment per student:
Johns Hopkins, 366k
https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/EndowmentPerStudent/State/MD/
Williams, 1.4 million
https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/EndowmentPerStudent/State/MD/

Any questions?

Anonymous wrote:Or way to view LACs is that they are advanced high school. LACs can be excellent and offer one a great education, but cannot compare with National Universities due to the dramatic difference in resources.

I know you intended this without irony, but let’s just say you should understand what “milking the cow” means at Williams. There is indeed a dramatic difference in resources spent on undergrads — in favor of the wealthiest SLACs. I can say with complete confidence that you have never seen anything like it.

I don't understand the question. This is an A student with a 1500+ score. And she doesn't want to go to a college that is "competitive?"

What does that even mean?

Like, she doesn't want to apply to schools that are generally rejective? Community college solves that. Plus most of the public satellite campuses. Just enroll. Or does she not want to go to a school where students take classes seriously and try their best? There are a bunch of rich kid liberal arts colleges that are way down the list that will be very happy to take your money and not expect much academically.

Is she intimidated by students who are motivated and challenge themselves? Does she just want to glide for four years? Does she expect education to happen through osmosis? It seems odd to reject everything from a tiny little rural SLAC to giant a state school like UCLA out of hand because students... study? Have ambition? Want to do well?

Usually when a bright teenager loses all motivation there's something else going on. Is she using a lot of weed? Is she depressed? Those are the usual two suspects.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or way to view LACs is that they are advanced high school. LACs can be excellent and offer one a great education, but cannot compare with National Universities due to the dramatic difference in resources.

yes and many national universities provide an excellent grad school experience- but are lacking in undergrad experience, where the WASP schools absolutely shine

Your statement regarding lack of an undergraduate experience at National Universities is incorrect and evidence that you have never been a student at a top ranked National University.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Williams would 1000% - and probably higher than JHU, which some would say is a one trick pony

Now you're just be silly & childish. Compare the research budget of JHU to any other school in the world. JHU's 2023 fiscal year research budget was over $3.8 billion ($3,800,000,000+). Over $3.8 billion for just one year. Williams College's R&D budget for the same fiscal year (2023) was a paltry $3.448 million (less than one-tenth of one percent of JHU's 2023 R&D budget!)

JHU's $3,800,000,000+ budget versus Williams College's $3,448,000 R&D budget. They are in two different leagues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Why are you, from England? We are not talking about grad school rankings.

Both Brown and Dartmouth are far superior for undergrad. You may disagree; but applicants don’t. 80% choose Brown over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
72% choose Dartmouth over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
Stop digging your hole.

not to add fuel to this fire but Williams does trounce JHU in terms of x admits also..

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Johns+Hopkins+University&with=Williams+College

Anonymous wrote:Or way to view LACs is that they are advanced high school. LACs can be excellent and offer one a great education, but cannot compare with National Universities due to the dramatic difference in resources.

yes and many national universities provide an excellent grad school experience- but are lacking in undergrad experience, where the WASP schools absolutely shine

Anonymous wrote:What a stupid stupid stupid asinine thread

Redundant, even.

What a stupid stupid stupid asinine thread

This ranking of LACs and their methodology is interesting:

https://wallethub.com/edu/e/best-colleges-in-the-us-ranking/40748

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Why are you, from England? We are not talking about grad school rankings.

Both Brown and Dartmouth are far superior for undergrad. You may disagree; but applicants don’t. 80% choose Brown over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
72% choose Dartmouth over Hopkins:
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Brown+University&with=Johns+Hopkins+University
Stop digging your hole.

Or way to view LACs is that they are advanced high school. LACs can be excellent and offer one a great education, but cannot compare with National Universities due to the dramatic difference in resources.

Anonymous wrote:Very odd that some LAC supporters criticize Johns Hopkins University. JHU has, by far, the largest research & development (R&D) budget of any US school and probably of any school in the world. There is no LAC that is even close to JHU or to any Top 15 university excluding Dartmouth College & Brown University--an other of which are over-rated.

If LACs were ranked with National Universities, none--according to the Wall Street Journal & The Times Higher Education published rankings, would fall among the top 20 schools.

Williams would 1000% - and probably higher than JHU, which some would say is a one trick pony

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For such a goal, it might make sense to avoid the most selective colleges. As a tool, this site provides Student Selectivity Ranks for colleges and universities together:

https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750

Swarthmore, for example, placed 19th nationally by selectivity.

This list is crap. It does not factor in ED; it is just admit rates. The more the class is filled ED, the lower the admit rate. Chicago is 4 on this list; its ED admit rate is estimated at 40%. Just ask us what the admit rates mean; we’ll tell you. Once again, Swat is a way tougher admit than Chicago…

Your comments are crap.

The WalletHub methodology used 30 factors, not just overall admit rates.

U Chicago is a better school than Swarthmore because of the greater number of brilliant students and the presence of graduate students & programs. However, Swarthmore & U Chicago are similar in that they both encourage intellectualism among their students. Swarthmore is tiny, and that is a weakness due to fewer perspectives and less varied input.

The “student selectivity rank” is solely admit rates. Look it up yourself, cite next time you post, and no need for an apology: I know you are trying your best.

Why don't you offer a citation ?