Anonymous wrote:These kids are extreme outliers. I have two kids at T10s and they're just normal kids (we get substantial financial aid as well) I've met several of their friends who also are just average kids. I am also a teacher at a local high school that sends 2-4 kids to a T10 every year Yes, they are smart and hardworking, but they aren't rich and doing anything crazy to get into these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Knowing this, it seems like a waste to even try to get into an Ivy
https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-ivy-league-prep-ultrawealthy-30k-schools-and-resumes-2025-9
On the other hand, why do billionaires even need this kind of college counseling service when they can just use their influence and connections?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The colleges and universities do see through this to an extent. Any programs that are pay-to-play are generally discounted. Competitive programs like the MIT summer research programs or Telluride are more highly valued.
Mountain school just has a semester away tuition. It’s for an entire semester and it’s a very rigorous admissions process. The others I’m not sure about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've had two kids at a very top all-boys private school in nyc and I see some of this. But parents were fixated on getting the kid into the right k-12 or k-8/9 and then the right HS. There were counselors for that. Once that was locked it, it was mostly about fostering the right peer group, not building a resume. They would get the guys out for a weekend at our place out east". My kids aren't the rich ones (we get FA), But these parents encourage their kids mixing with the kids they approve of. And that's a mix of wealth and/or bright in some way (math winners or debate champs or student government heads). Drinking is fine, drugs are not. The billionaire son whose spending too many weekends doing club drugs is greeted with a hug and may be invited to the box at the Yankees game, but won't be asked on the trip to the Bermuda house.
For college - if their double legacy, sure. They may work hard for that. But these families are also doing REA to Notre Dame or okay if the kid wants USC or perfectly happy with Middlebury.
TLDR, I'm fascinated more with the social engineering and protecting the downside in HS than the college stuff, which doesnt seem off the charts.
You have lost perspective. To most of the world, it’s off the charts.
Anonymous wrote:Meh. I didn't read the article, but too much is assumed about why certain kids get in.
We are plenty well-off, at potential-big-donor level. Kids didn't do any special ECs. Kids did not submit a resume. No research, no internship. Two attend T10s. Their essays were genuine and written by them (I am the only person who reviewed them), and they had great academic stats. Was wealth a factor? If it was, we didn't need to signal any of the above special stuff.
Admissions consultants are here to sell their services, which they do by convincing people that their services are necessary. Consider whether their services are truly necessary.
Personally, I suspect their services are most helpful for kids with unique needs, but that is a different topic.
Anonymous wrote:The colleges and universities do see through this to an extent. Any programs that are pay-to-play are generally discounted. Competitive programs like the MIT summer research programs or Telluride are more highly valued.
Anonymous wrote:I"m sure you're right that kids with tons of resources have tons of opportunities, but I think about my unhooked, public school kid who just graduated from HYP and may of her friends I met along the way, and many of the kids from our good (but not famous) public school and think - well there's still spots out there for some regular kids, they are hard to get but not impossible.
Anonymous wrote:Without giving up too many details ...
I have a friend whose kid went to a fancy NJ private. The kid has learning struggles and emotional struggles.
Yes, his whole college admissions packet was very curated. I wasn't surprised about that.
What I WAS surprised about was how the school had engineered a lot of their extracurriculars to be well over-the-top and more impressive-sounding than what most public schools offer. Like, a service organization was probably the same amount of hours, but it was much higher-profile and kind of exotic. It would make an impression.
He aimed really high and got into a couple of T20s. The reason I mentioned that he had had some struggles is that I think my struggling public school kid wouldn't get in anywhere near where he did!