Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much water do VA’s data centers take from the Potomac? What will get water priority when we have another drought? People or data centers?
Now your concern with data centers is that every 10 years or so you might be told to not water lawn?
This is a relatively water-rich region. This is a strange thing to focus on here. As you suggested, nearly all of the data centers pull water from the Potomac. But it is the municipalities that pull from wells that have run into water shortages, not the ones that pull from the Potomac.
Anonymous wrote:How much water do VA’s data centers take from the Potomac? What will get water priority when we have another drought? People or data centers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not put the data centers in places where they can be powered by electricity from renewable sources (e.g. Texas wind and solar, geothermal in Iceland, etc.)? Also, why don’t utilities charge the companies a high rate, rather than passing it on to regional consumers?
Proximity to existing data centers and fiber networks is one of the most significant factors that determines placement for new data centers. Information typically needs to bounce around through multiple different company data centers before it gets to the end user. Lower latency is very important.
That's wrong. We can centrally plan our way out of this mess with just a few decades of government studies on the optimal locations. We will need to select a committee first to choose the selection criteria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should areas where crops are grown carry a disproportionate load of the farming when everyone everywhere eats food?
Farms presumably generate some local economic activity, whereas data centers are run by companies based elsewhere and require very little manpower while using finite high-value resources. I think OP asks a valid question.
You're underestimating the overall value those data centers bring. Part of the reason that Reston has a large number of tech jobs is because companies have data centers in that area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not put the data centers in places where they can be powered by electricity from renewable sources (e.g. Texas wind and solar, geothermal in Iceland, etc.)? Also, why don’t utilities charge the companies a high rate, rather than passing it on to regional consumers?
Proximity to existing data centers and fiber networks is one of the most significant factors that determines placement for new data centers. Information typically needs to bounce around through multiple different company data centers before it gets to the end user. Lower latency is very important.
Anonymous wrote:Why not put the data centers in places where they can be powered by electricity from renewable sources (e.g. Texas wind and solar, geothermal in Iceland, etc.)? Also, why don’t utilities charge the companies a high rate, rather than passing it on to regional consumers?
Anonymous wrote:I think you are underestimating how many data centers there are elsewhere. I live in the land of cornfields and they are putting in 2 data centers near me (on former farmland). One owned by Microsoft and one by Google.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What benefits are they bringing? It isn’t a plethora of jobs and tax revenue.
Have you ever driven out to Reston? Why do think those tech companies have offices there?