Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Not parents saying how wonderful kid is. By middle school, they have a track record.
- 99% SSAT
- standardized tests scores off the charts in subject matters
- potential/likely D1 athletic recruit for college, with coaches known to private school coaches who vouch
- teacher recommendations that say best student ive seen in a decade, particularly from teachers known to private school
Im sure there are other things. This isn’t kindergarten entry.
Look, kids get admitted for sibling, donation abilities, friends of friends, etc. But by 9th, they typically are very good students as well at the top tier schools & you have unconnected kids who are off the charts (like above).
-
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting because I always assumed the opposite (that 80% were perfectly qualified and that the decisions were based on the non-academic differences). I’m not basing my opinion on anything factual, just a gut that may be wrong.
Between grade inflation and a certain “type” of family that seeks out private schools, I kind of assumed that nearly every applicant to the super competitive schools was an A/A- and occasional B+ student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Not parents saying how wonderful kid is. By middle school, they have a track record.
- 99% SSAT
- standardized tests scores off the charts in subject matters
- potential/likely D1 athletic recruit for college, with coaches known to private school coaches who vouch
- teacher recommendations that say best student ive seen in a decade, particularly from teachers known to private school
Im sure there are other things. This isn’t kindergarten entry.
Look, kids get admitted for sibling, donation abilities, friends of friends, etc. But by 9th, they typically are very good students as well at the top tier schools & you have unconnected kids who are off the charts (like above).
-
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Not parents saying how wonderful kid is. By middle school, they have a track record.
- 99% SSAT
- standardized tests scores off the charts in subject matters
- potential/likely D1 athletic recruit for college, with coaches known to private school coaches who vouch
- teacher recommendations that say best student ive seen in a decade, particularly from teachers known to private school
Im sure there are other things. This isn’t kindergarten entry.
Look, kids get admitted for sibling, donation abilities, friends of friends, etc. But by 9th, they typically are very good students as well at the top tier schools & you have unconnected kids who are off the charts (like above).
-
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
DEI matters as well.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Not parents saying how wonderful kid is. By middle school, they have a track record.
- 99% SSAT
- standardized tests scores off the charts in subject matters
- potential/likely D1 athletic recruit for college, with coaches known to private school coaches who vouch
- teacher recommendations that say best student ive seen in a decade, particularly from teachers known to private school
Im sure there are other things. This isn’t kindergarten entry.
Look, kids get admitted for sibling, donation abilities, friends of friends, etc. But by 9th, they typically are very good students as well at the top tier schools & you have unconnected kids who are off the charts (like above).
-
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
I’m curious this too. There’s so many bright and talented students in this area. What makes some qualified vs highly qualified
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's kind of relative too. Our AD told me once that while they got a lot of applications, the actual pool of candidates they deemed qualified was about 10% of the total. The admissions rate among that group was about 80% (and they hated to WL any of them, but there are only so many seats in the class). So, if you are considered highly qualified, your chances are great. If you aren't (90% of applicants), your chances are zero.
What would mark you as highly qualified as a rising freshman?
Anonymous wrote:What impact will the stats have anyway? Are you going to apply or not apply based on the stats? Data is just trivia unless it impacts your decisions.