Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

EU is already in shambles now.

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/2095944/eu-plan-read-all-your/amp

TLDR: EU is now planning to scan all private messages throughout EU countries.

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

Anonymous wrote:You can’t groom children online if you can’t identify them. This is what it is all about, has nothing to do with protecting children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

lol? Spotify now needs age verifications? What for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

EU is already in shambles now.

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/2095944/eu-plan-read-all-your/amp

TLDR: EU is now planning to scan all private messages throughout EU countries.

Anonymous wrote:You geniuses all thought that when a site asks you your age, it's because they don't actually need to know?

Let's see that energy when your 13 year old kids are buying weed and liquor at the shops. How dare they ask for id!

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

Anonymous wrote:Like someone else said, the AI pretty much determines your age based on how long ago you created your Google account, your entire YouTube search and watch history. I think if your watch history contains more videos of something being meant for kids, then the AI will start flagging those to assume that you are more likely to be a kid rather than an adult.

Honestly, YouTube is being a stupid company once again. I believe this entire ID verification thing feels like a dystopia where 1984 felt like a warning for us.

Even Spotify for UK? They literally implemented something like this for an ID verification if you are caught under 18 because of the UK online safety act and how they are trying to improve “child safety” (PS: it actually isn't making kids safe.)

I am so tired of all these act that keep saying that it is to improve children safety on the internet, yet instead this feels like actual surveillance that the government is trying to take your information.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in social media and am 100% on board with as much regulation as possible.

People don’t understand how many predators there are online. It’s hundreds upon hundreds of thousands, if not millions. I did some consulting with federal LEO on catching people on social media, and there are so many predators, you could put every law enforcement officer from the FBI director to your local mall cop on crimes against children, and they still would only be able to catch and prosecute a small fraction of them.

That’s not even taking into account the death threats women receive online. I’ve worked with multiple women influencers and they get death threats nonstop, along with stalkers.

Men have proven they cannot handle the anonymity of the internet. They absolutely should need an ID to participate.

Quite a lot of people know the dangers of predators, its just awful how so many big companies like YouTube keep predators and their channels active on their site still. Then again, they also have an awful AI moderation which someone got falsely flagged for “child safety” over them hitting their microphone on accident.

People need to understand you can’t have your cake and eat it, too.

If we’re going to monitor for predators, we need AI to help. The alternative is to pay humans to, and we’ve seen that causes people extreme trauma when they’re exposed to it 8 hours a day, 5 days a week.

AI isn’t going to be perfect right from the beginning. Remember how horrible AI images were 2-3 years ago? It’s improved massively since then. Same with AI moderation. It’s not going to be perfect, but if we want moderation to keep predators away, we need to start somewhere. YouTube certainly doesn’t want legit creators getting kicked off for no reason, that would be bad for their business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in social media and am 100% on board with as much regulation as possible.

People don’t understand how many predators there are online. It’s hundreds upon hundreds of thousands, if not millions. I did some consulting with federal LEO on catching people on social media, and there are so many predators, you could put every law enforcement officer from the FBI director to your local mall cop on crimes against children, and they still would only be able to catch and prosecute a small fraction of them.

That’s not even taking into account the death threats women receive online. I’ve worked with multiple women influencers and they get death threats nonstop, along with stalkers.

Men have proven they cannot handle the anonymity of the internet. They absolutely should need an ID to participate.

Quite a lot of people know the dangers of predators, its just awful how so many big companies like YouTube keep predators and their channels active on their site still. Then again, they also have an awful AI moderation which someone got falsely flagged for “child safety” over them hitting their microphone on accident.

Anonymous wrote:I work in social media and am 100% on board with as much regulation as possible.

People don’t understand how many predators there are online. It’s hundreds upon hundreds of thousands, if not millions. I did some consulting with federal LEO on catching people on social media, and there are so many predators, you could put every law enforcement officer from the FBI director to your local mall cop on crimes against children, and they still would only be able to catch and prosecute a small fraction of them.

That’s not even taking into account the death threats women receive online. I’ve worked with multiple women influencers and they get death threats nonstop, along with stalkers.

Men have proven they cannot handle the anonymity of the internet. They absolutely should need an ID to participate.

Anonymous wrote:I work in social media and am 100% on board with as much regulation as possible.

People don’t understand how many predators there are online. It’s hundreds upon hundreds of thousands, if not millions. I did some consulting with federal LEO on catching people on social media, and there are so many predators, you could put every law enforcement officer from the FBI director to your local mall cop on crimes against children, and they still would only be able to catch and prosecute a small fraction of them.

That’s not even taking into account the death threats women receive online. I’ve worked with multiple women influencers and they get death threats nonstop, along with stalkers.

Men have proven they cannot handle the anonymity of the internet. They absolutely should need an ID to participate.