Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
yep, which is why DH and I have always planned on retiring early. I'm still working at 55; DH was laid off at 59.
That was easier for you boomers and older GenX — you bought homes when they were CHEAP.
The rest of us had to burn money on rent and expensive mortgages.
Gen Xer here. Mortgage rates were 8% in 2000 when we bought our house. That was not easy. We refinanced over the years.
Yeah 8% for a 50k house gtfo
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
yep, which is why DH and I have always planned on retiring early. I'm still working at 55; DH was laid off at 59.
That was easier for you boomers and older GenX — you bought homes when they were CHEAP.
The rest of us had to burn money on rent and expensive mortgages.
Gen Xer here. Mortgage rates were 8% in 2000 when we bought our house. That was not easy. We refinanced over the years.
Yeah 8% for a 50k house gtfo
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
yep, which is why DH and I have always planned on retiring early. I'm still working at 55; DH was laid off at 59.
That was easier for you boomers and older GenX — you bought homes when they were CHEAP.
The rest of us had to burn money on rent and expensive mortgages.
Gen Xer here. Mortgage rates were 8% in 2000 when we bought our house. That was not easy. We refinanced over the years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
yep, which is why DH and I have always planned on retiring early. I'm still working at 55; DH was laid off at 59.
That was easier for you boomers and older GenX — you bought homes when they were CHEAP.
The rest of us had to burn money on rent and expensive mortgages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BLS and other data agencies were not spared, and a lot of people are worried about the quality of analysis going forward. Earlier this year BLS said it would stop collecting a few kinds of data and instead infer it, which has implications for accuracy.
So Statisticians and economists were fired as well?
FHFA RIFed almost all of their economists and statisticians. The whole division was decimated in March.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
yep, which is why DH and I have always planned on retiring early. I'm still working at 55; DH was laid off at 59.
Anonymous wrote:I retired actually a year before the DOGE mess. I was 58 I always wanted to work part- time. I’ve applied for some very part-time easy jobs - think libraries, schools.
Nothing. Age discrimination is very real. It’s upsetting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BLS and other data agencies were not spared, and a lot of people are worried about the quality of analysis going forward. Earlier this year BLS said it would stop collecting a few kinds of data and instead infer it, which has implications for accuracy.
So Statisticians and economists were fired as well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re: BLS, the stat agencies all lost a lot of people, but no RIFs or firing of probationaries so far to my knowledge.
A lot of people took DRP or VERA though, for a few reasons. A large cohort of people were close to retirement age. Loss of telework was also big, as many people had been mostly WFH before COVID, and Census in particular had been fully remote for nearly 5 years while their building was renovated. For BLS, a lot of people didn't want to change their commute to Suitland (Former HQ was next to Union Station).
Also, a bunch of senior leadership who deal with the Decennial Census left, presumably because they didn't want to go through a repeat of how the admin tried to politicize the 2020 Census.
The job market for statisticians and economists is OK, there are private sector employers that pay more money, and it's historically been easy for good people to pivot. The thing is, most people at the stat agencies don't really want those private sector jobs, they want to contribute to public statistics and knowledge. The other ways to do that (like academia or think tanks) are all hurting right now, and they depend heavily on stat agency data that might just go away if too many people leave. So people either left right away, or they are hunkered down and planning to ride it out.
What private sector employers hire labor economists? I thought they mostly focused on macro/financial economists?