Anonymous wrote:If I'm paying for training, I want the instructors focused on my kid, not making content.
Anonymous wrote:False8 is all about FOMO. All of the training groups are but false8 really works that angle. Their social media is relentless.
Anonymous wrote:how is it they brand their sessions ecnl/MLSN/GA in their reels but all the kids are Ulittles and all at pre age?
Anonymous wrote:how is it they brand their sessions ecnl/MLSN/GA in their reels but all the kids are Ulittles and all at pre age?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I still want to know where the name comes from. Usually you don't lead with "False" in your branding. What does the name mean/how was it picked?
It's a soccer position, just like a false 9. It's an 8 that acts like a 10.
Anonymous wrote:I still want to know where the name comes from. Usually you don't lead with "False" in your branding. What does the name mean/how was it picked?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is absolutely a pay to play issue, as a former trainer I can easily run a session and get 10 kids to pay 35-50 and pocket the money and make them tired with the intensity, or tout 1000 touches in an hour. Kids will be marginally better at the end of multiple sessions if they started at a low level. OR I can charge $100 and really work with 1 or 2 skilled kids and actually correct bad habits, teach practical game skills etc and the kid will get better quickly. Which one would you pick if your trying to make money?
This is why its so hard to find a good trainer, its more about volume of kids they train.
Not trying to be a smart ass, but quantify good, then ask yourself “how much am I willing to pay?”
The poster above is spot on. Group training is essentially another team practice, but with kids from different teams.
The best investment is individual (1-2 kids) training to correct bad habits, introduce new, good ones, and to push kids to use football intelligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is absolutely a pay to play issue, as a former trainer I can easily run a session and get 10 kids to pay 35-50 and pocket the money and make them tired with the intensity, or tout 1000 touches in an hour. Kids will be marginally better at the end of multiple sessions if they started at a low level. OR I can charge $100 and really work with 1 or 2 skilled kids and actually correct bad habits, teach practical game skills etc and the kid will get better quickly. Which one would you pick if your trying to make money?
This is why its so hard to find a good trainer, its more about volume of kids they train.
Not trying to be a smart ass, but quantify good, then ask yourself “how much am I willing to pay?”
The poster above is spot on. Group training is essentially another team practice, but with kids from different teams.
The best investment is individual (1-2 kids) training to correct bad habits, introduce new, good ones, and to push kids to use football intelligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is absolutely a pay to play issue, as a former trainer I can easily run a session and get 10 kids to pay 35-50 and pocket the money and make them tired with the intensity, or tout 1000 touches in an hour. Kids will be marginally better at the end of multiple sessions if they started at a low level. OR I can charge $100 and really work with 1 or 2 skilled kids and actually correct bad habits, teach practical game skills etc and the kid will get better quickly. Which one would you pick if your trying to make money?
This is why its so hard to find a good trainer, its more about volume of kids they train.